site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DavePR

join:2008-06-04
Canyon Country, CA
Reviews:
·DSL EXTREME

reply to fAcEtIOUs

Re: Really......

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by Cheese:

It took them 10 years to figure this out this house wasn't serviceable?
NO. It was because the ongoing switch from analog channels to digital channels made that drop non-serviceable.

So digital is better how?


fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

said by DavePR:

said by fAcEtIOUs:

said by Cheese:

It took them 10 years to figure this out this house wasn't serviceable?
NO. It was because the ongoing switch from analog channels to digital channels made that drop non-serviceable.

So digital is better how?
IF YOU GET the signal, it is better & clearer on digital. Digital is pretty much you get it or you don't. But if it is a weak signal, then analog will still work, even though the picture may not be very good.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:12
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·Optimum Voice
·Gizmo5

reply to DavePR

Digital downside

said by DavePR:

So digital is better how?
Yup, digital is better for most people, but as this thread indicates, some users will be worse off.

This switch to digital is ALSO affecting over-the-air TV broadcast saturation. Some antenna users who were able to receive adequate analog signals will not be able to receive adequate digital signals after the change.

For example, see this:

FCC Identifies Hundreds Of Stations With DTV Coverage Gaps
»www.broadcastingcable.com/articl···975.html

Thursday, 31-May 12:27:05 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics