<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21686213</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:42:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 03:42:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: just have them run TWO  RG11 cable drops from the tap</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21693178</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/838747"><b>Mordhem</b></A> : This would be a day in the Park for Comcast, Just install some QR320 or RG11. I used to work for Comcast in Baltimore but now I live in SC, and I now work for direct tv. I am praying charter goes under and Comcast eats them. I would not mind dawning the black and red again but I know for sure I will never work for charter lol.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21693178</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:13:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21690983</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Yeah.  The truth about cable is finally out.<br><br>lol indeed.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21690983</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:10:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21690193</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/628714"><b>maartena</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  pnh102 <A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>These kinds of situations would be ideal for cable companies offering contracts.  Presuming that this is a private home, a contract could be offered that stipulates that Charter be compensated should the owner sell the house before the term of the contract expires.</div>I think there is a legal loophole that prevents these kinds of contracts.... Although I am not sure, I believe that a contract can never have any penalties if the service cannot be offered.<br><br>It's the same with cell phone service, if you move to an address that is not serviced by a cell tower, you can legally and without penalty break the contract, even if it is 2 months old and you got the $300 phone for "free" with a 2 year signup.<br><br>Again, I am not entirely sure, but I think there is a law that prohibits companies from selling contracts for service that the enduser cannot get out of, IF the company cannot even supply the service.<br><br>In this case, if he would sell the house, move 50 miles into say TWC or Comcast territory, there is no legal way Charter can insist on a penalty. If he however would move into an area served by Charter, he could at least be kept to the contract - at least if there is a "so many years" contract.<br><br>Now I am sure there are many different types of contracts, but I am pretty positive the deciding factor is "can the service or product be offered". If yes, you can't get out. If no, you can cancel/get out without penalties.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21690193</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:51:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21688485</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1580358"><b>chance360</b></A> : What this man needs is a spool, some pipe, and a... DITCHWITCH!!!!!!!<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.ditchwitch.com/trenchers-plows/pedestrian" >www.ditchwitch.com/trenchers-plo&middot;&middot;&middot;destrian</A> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21688485</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:18:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686988</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  RadioDoc <A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> So much for that tired old argument against distance-limited DSL.<br> </div>What you mean the TRUTH? lol<br><br>Get real.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686988</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:40:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: just have them run TWO  RG11 cable drops from the tap</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : Yea.. we're missing part of the story.. I've run RG11 drops farther than 350' before and hooked up interactive services just fine.. <br><br>.. something stinks here. An honestly.. one drop could run that whole service.. amp it in the home and it's fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686403</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:45:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686213</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/629959"><b>marigolds</b></A> : A lot of regional franchises bar or limit cancellation fees and ETFs, and the fcc has made a lot of noise on limiting them. More importantly, FCC limits ETFs from being applied if the customer moves into a non-serviceable area. (That might create a very bizarre catch-22 in this case that could allow the customer to cancel at any time without the fee.)<br><br>Also, if the franchise is sold, customers get the option of terminating any existing contracts.<br><small>--<br>ISCABBS - the oldest and largest BBS on the Internet<br>telnet://bbs.iscabbs.com<br>Professional Geographer<br>Geographic Information Science researcher</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21686213</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:12:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21685875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/157889"><b>RadioDoc</b></A> : Hmmm....distance-limited cable Internet.  What a concept.  So much for that tired old argument against distance-limited DSL.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21685875</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:11:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>just have them run TWO  RG11 cable drops from the tap</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21683861</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : (RG6 -- 350 feet is too far) I used to work as a contractor installing cable modems for Charter.  I measured long drops with my handy measuring wheel many times.  Charter pressured us to get these customers up and running when their own techs couldn't do it.  <br><br>1 RG11 drop for the TV sets - Digital boxes<br>&<br>1 RG11 drop for the Cable Modem and VOIP]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21683861</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:45:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why Not Offer A Contract?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21683508</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/625141"><b>pnh102</b></A> : These kinds of situations would be ideal for cable companies offering contracts.  Presuming that this is a private home, a contract could be offered that stipulates that Charter be compensated should the owner sell the house before the term of the contract expires.<br><small>--<br>Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21683508</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 09:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
