 jjoshuaPremium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ
kudos:1
1 edit | Finally Something reasonable. And legal. |
|
|
|
RadioDoc58ef2c0Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11 | No kidding. And way late. Amazon, eMusic and 7digital (among others) had been doing this for quite awhile now.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
beaups
join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH | reply to jjoshua
the 256kbs bitrate is exciting too. I could never imagine paying $1 for a DRM'd 128kbps song. I would think if you want people to pay for something when the competition is "free" then you better at least make sure the product is just as good. This is good. |
|
quatrixPremium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
kudos:2 | reply to jjoshua
It was already legal, but I'm sure you knew that. |
|
| I think the point is, before the options were reasonable OR legal, now we have something that is both reasonable AND legal.
--
OASAASLLS |
|
 N3OGHYo Soy Col. "Bat" GuanoPremium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1
1 edit | reply to jjoshua
Considering most of the music I like is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
All I've got to say is if teenage girls start listening to Steely Dan and Oingo Boingo, I may have to get Medieval on someone quick....
Edit to add "I like"
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power… |
|
| reply to jjoshua
said by jjoshua:Something reasonable. And legal. Agreed |
|
 81399672Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:2 | reply to jjoshua
Hahahaha....like that will make a difference. |
|
 OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL | reply to jjoshua
I may start using itunes again. |
|
 Grail KnightQui audet adipisciturPremium
join:2003-05-31
Valhalla
kudos:6
 ·Time Warner Cable
1 edit | reply to N3OGH
quote:
Considering most of the music is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
What you consider unpopular more then likely is someone else's favorite music.
I listen to Classical & Symphonic music and have always paid dirt cheap prices only because others deem it unpopular.
IMO the price across the board should be a fixed rate of say .50¢ per song.
Edit*
--
"The little things are infinitely the most important." |
|
OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL | I am only into 80's and 90's music. |
|
Grail KnightQui audet adipisciturPremium
join:2003-05-31
Valhalla
kudos:6 | To each their own.  |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK | reply to jjoshua
Question is now will they begin inching up the pricing. To me even $1.29 seems pretty high for an .mp3 |
|
| reply to jjoshua
said by jjoshua:Something reasonable. And legal. $1.29 for a lossy format audio file is unreasonable. |
|
 Count ZeroMD2BePremium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA | reply to RadioDoc
said by RadioDoc:No kidding. And way late. Amazon, eMusic and 7digital (among others) had been doing this for quite awhile now. And the DRM-free part wasn't Apple's fault. Besides Apple's iTunes Store is still the single largest music sales force in the market PERIOD. |
|
Count ZeroMD2BePremium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA | reply to KrK
Now that Apple has agreed to this pricing scheme expect it to become the norm in all of the online music stores in the near future. |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to Grail Knight
said by Grail Knight: quote:
Considering most of the music is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
What you consider unpopular more then likely is someone else's favorite music. I listen to Classical & Symphonic music and have always paid dirt cheap prices only because others deem it unpopular. IMO the price across the board should be a fixed rate of say .50¢ per song. Edit* Really 69 cents is not that much. Hell 30 years ago I was paying $1 for a 45 single. That's about $2.50 in today money. |
|
Grail KnightQui audet adipisciturPremium
join:2003-05-31
Valhalla
kudos:6 Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
1 edit | As I said across the board as in one set price.
Not .39 here and a buck and change there.
I really do not care if it is a dime or a buck something per song just level the playing field IMO.
Edit*
--
"The little things are infinitely the most important." |
|
 SlyPremium
join:2004-02-20
Johnson City, TN
 ·Callcentric
2 edits | reply to beaups
What they charge for a song is what I pay for an album... One song? 18¢... DRM free and high variable bitrate.
»www.mp3count.com
One song? 18¢... DRM free and high variable bitrate.
--
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."
- Plato - |
|
| reply to 45612019
Interesting theory. I wonder how people justified buying records and cassette tapes. |
|
