republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » iTunes Dumps The DRM » Finally
Uniqs:
412
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
It's all about the Beatles »
« 1,000's Of Songs Posted On You Tube  

jjoshua
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Scotch Plains, NJ

1 edit

Finally

Something reasonable. And legal.
RadioDoc
58ef2c0
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11

Re: Finally

No kidding. And way late. Amazon, eMusic and 7digital (among others) had been doing this for quite awhile now.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

Count Zero
MD2Be
Premium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI

Re: Finally

said by RadioDoc See Profile :

No kidding. And way late. Amazon, eMusic and 7digital (among others) had been doing this for quite awhile now.
And the DRM-free part wasn't Apple's fault. Besides Apple's iTunes Store is still the single largest music sales force in the market PERIOD.
beaups

join:2003-08-11
Hilliard, OH

the 256kbs bitrate is exciting too. I could never imagine paying $1 for a DRM'd 128kbps song. I would think if you want people to pay for something when the competition is "free" then you better at least make sure the product is just as good. This is good.

Sly
Premium
join:2004-02-20
Johnson City, TN
clubs:
·Packet8
·Callcentric
·Comcast Formerly ..


2 edits

Re: Finally

What they charge for a song is what I pay for an album... One song? 18¢... DRM free and high variable bitrate.

»www.mp3count.com

One song? 18¢... DRM free and high variable bitrate.

--
"The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men."
- Plato -
quatrix
Premium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
It was already legal, but I'm sure you knew that.

canesfan2001

join:2003-02-04
Hialeah, FL

Re: Finally

I think the point is, before the options were reasonable OR legal, now we have something that is both reasonable AND legal.
--
OASAASLLS

N3OGH
Bear patrol must be working like a charm
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL


1 edit
Considering most of the music I like is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.

All I've got to say is if teenage girls start listening to Steely Dan and Oingo Boingo, I may have to get Medieval on someone quick....

Edit to add "I like"
--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power…

Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL


1 edit

Re: Finally

quote:
Considering most of the music is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
What you consider unpopular more then likely is someone else's favorite music.

I listen to Classical & Symphonic music and have always paid dirt cheap prices only because others deem it unpopular.

IMO the price across the board should be a fixed rate of say .50¢ per song.

Edit*
--
"The little things are infinitely the most important."

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL

Re: Finally

I am only into 80's and 90's music.

Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31

Re: Finally

To each their own.

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by Grail Knight See Profile :

quote:
Considering most of the music is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
What you consider unpopular more then likely is someone else's favorite music.

I listen to Classical & Symphonic music and have always paid dirt cheap prices only because others deem it unpopular.

IMO the price across the board should be a fixed rate of say .50¢ per song.

Edit*
Really 69 cents is not that much. Hell 30 years ago I was paying $1 for a 45 single. That's about $2.50 in today money.

Grail Knight
Who Dares Wins
Premium
join:2003-05-31
·Verizon Online DSL


1 edit

Re: Finally

As I said across the board as in one set price.
Not .39 here and a buck and change there.

I really do not care if it is a dime or a buck something per song just level the playing field IMO.

Edit*
--
"The little things are infinitely the most important."

ialsoagreeee

@ameritech.net

Re: Finally

I agree, 50 cents across the board for 256k mp3 is a fair price, considering it doesn't cost them anything since it is a "copy" and not a resource. Also this will attract more customers and spur demand.
Surfinusa
Premium
join:2001-02-08
said by jjoshua See Profile :

Something reasonable. And legal.
Agreed

81399672
Premium
join:2006-05-17
Los Angeles, CA
Hahahaha....like that will make a difference.

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL
I may start using itunes again.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Question is now will they begin inching up the pricing. To me even $1.29 seems pretty high for an .mp3

Count Zero
MD2Be
Premium
join:2007-01-18
Warner Robins, GA

Re: Finally

Now that Apple has agreed to this pricing scheme expect it to become the norm in all of the online music stores in the near future.

Xizer

join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

said by jjoshua See Profile :

Something reasonable. And legal.
$1.29 for a lossy format audio file is unreasonable.

insomniac84

join:2002-01-03
Schererville, IN

Re: Finally

Interesting theory. I wonder how people justified buying records and cassette tapes.

Xizer

join:2004-02-05
New York, NY

Re: Finally

said by insomniac84 See Profile :

Interesting theory. I wonder how people justified buying records and cassette tapes.
Are you proprosing that we actually regress when it comes to audio technology? That's absurd.

The technology for lossless audio is readily available and has been for many years. It is unacceptable for it to not be used.

Ebolla

join:2005-09-28
Dracut, MA

Re: Finally

Think the point was that at the time when cassettes were king that people said "hmmm $x.xx is reasonable for this format" when they could also borrow tape and dub from a friend. I don't think his point was lets go back to a format that doesn't make sense due to technology advances.

DrModem
Premium
join:2006-10-19
USA
·EarthLink
·1and1
·PeoplePC

said by Xizer See Profile :

said by jjoshua See Profile :

Something reasonable. And legal.
$1.29 for a lossy format audio file is unreasonable.
I have 256k MP3 files and can't hear the difference between them and an uncompressed WAV. 128k is another story altogether though.
Forums » iTunes Dumps The DRMIt's all about the Beatles »
« 1,000's Of Songs Posted On You Tube  


Thursday, 10-Dec 05:19:46 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [117] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [66] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [66] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [45] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· [ Classes] 3.2.2 Rogue [World of Warcraft]
· Security Software Updates - 10 Dec 2009 [Security]
· [Billing] $15.40 for HD Converter? [Comcast Cable TV]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]