 jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA | reply to RARPSL
Re: Tainted "journalism" I just don't see how any ISP's silence can come across as anything positive. How do you spin it to make the ISP's look consumer-centric?
OJ won't admit that he murdered Nicole.
OJ refuses to deny his involvement in Nicole's murder.
OJ remains tight-lipped while Nicole remains headless.
I can't make it work so that OJ's silence does anything other than bring suspicion upon himself.
If OJ officially stated that he did not murder Nicole, while it may not prove his innocence, if reported factually, it could not be implied or interpreted that he was guilty. |
