<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Weaker than Xohm in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21692532</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:46:00 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:46:00 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Weaker than Xohm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21699575</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : &raquo;<A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX" >en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX</A><br><br>It's a group of broadcasting technologies suitable for longer-range broadcasting than Wi-fi. It's usually cheaper to set up and run, although it can be used in close proximity for theoretically tremendous speeds. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21699575</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:47:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Weaker than Xohm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21694201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/594412"><b>TKJunkMail</b></A> : I thought Wimax was a 4G product. The upload speeds being offered are pretty anemic for 4G - they barely compete with the 3G wireless offerings from the telcos.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21694201</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:13:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Weaker than Xohm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21692532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1587675"><b>Smile__</b></A> : Marylander,<br><br> How's those 24MB/18MB speeds at the college? lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21692532</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:29:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Weaker than Xohm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21692220</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : If you compare the "Clear" plans to the current Xohm offerings "Clear" is a lot less competitive.<br><br>I don't understand why they'd eagerly "unveil" a weaker product in this kind of market.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21692220</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:33:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
