 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to Grail Knight
Re: Finally said by Grail Knight: quote:
Considering most of the music is old and unpopular, I expect to be paying less for more.
What you consider unpopular more then likely is someone else's favorite music. I listen to Classical & Symphonic music and have always paid dirt cheap prices only because others deem it unpopular. IMO the price across the board should be a fixed rate of say .50¢ per song. Edit* Really 69 cents is not that much. Hell 30 years ago I was paying $1 for a 45 single. That's about $2.50 in today money. |
|
|
|
 Grail KnightQui audet adipisciturPremium
join:2003-05-31
Valhalla
kudos:6
 ·Time Warner Cable
1 edit | As I said across the board as in one set price.
Not .39 here and a buck and change there.
I really do not care if it is a dime or a buck something per song just level the playing field IMO.
Edit*
--
"The little things are infinitely the most important." |
|
| I agree, 50 cents across the board for 256k mp3 is a fair price, considering it doesn't cost them anything since it is a "copy" and not a resource. Also this will attract more customers and spur demand. |
|
