site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Current Network Performance ·Network Status ·Customer Login
AuthorAll Replies

lorennerol
Premium
join:2003-10-29
Seattle, WA

reply to threecheese

Re: Full T1 vs Business Ethernet 3x3Mb (bonded)

Find out how many bonded Ethernet circuits they have running. When they first started bonding T1s they had all sorts of issues. You don't want to be their guinea pig.

I'm surprised that you can get a 9mbit Ethernet circuit for the same price as a T1. The T1 should be around $300- are you getting the bonded Ethernet circuit for that?

threecheese

join:2006-12-23
Babylon, NY

Good idea.

And, it doesn't say 9Mb anywhere in the literature, so do I assume that 3 x 3Mb == 9Mb? That makes sense in real life, but in marketing-speak...

I am worried about latency. Would I have to sacrifice the low latency of the T1 for the higher bandwidth of the Ethernet? It would be very helpful if someone could explain this to me.

Thanks!!



dslx_gm
Premium,VIP
join:2002-12-26
Winnetka, CA
kudos:15

I think they mean 3 by 3 and not 3 times 3. In other words 3 meg download and 3 meg upload not 9 meg.


speakeasy

join:2009-03-12

reply to threecheese
FYI -- Speakeasy has a sub-60 millisecond latency per their terms of service:

"Speakeasy guarantees a maximum average latency of 60 milliseconds from Customer's router to the nearest gateway on the IP network"

»speakeasy.net/tos/sla_bb.php



krosburg

@algx.net

Just want to make a comment about Speakeasy reselling ANYthing from XO -- this is not good at all. I am currently considering switching from XO to Speakeasy for the T1 (1.5) service and have had a really awful experience with XO over the years.


lorennerol
Premium
join:2003-10-29
Seattle, WA

said by krosburg :

Just want to make a comment about Speakeasy reselling ANYthing from XO -- this is not good at all. I am currently considering switching from XO to Speakeasy for the T1 (1.5) service and have had a really awful experience with XO over the years.
I have a 3.0/3.0 order in for a client right now. I'll report back after cutover to let everyone know how it's going.

cooldude9919

join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
kudos:5

said by lorennerol:

said by krosburg :

Just want to make a comment about Speakeasy reselling ANYthing from XO -- this is not good at all. I am currently considering switching from XO to Speakeasy for the T1 (1.5) service and have had a really awful experience with XO over the years.
I have a 3.0/3.0 order in for a client right now. I'll report back after cutover to let everyone know how it's going.
Let us know the lead time, actual throughput, and maybe a few trace routes. Are you going through xo or speakeasy?

lorennerol
Premium
join:2003-10-29
Seattle, WA

said by cooldude9919:

said by lorennerol:

said by krosburg :

Just want to make a comment about Speakeasy reselling ANYthing from XO -- this is not good at all. I am currently considering switching from XO to Speakeasy for the T1 (1.5) service and have had a really awful experience with XO over the years.
I have a 3.0/3.0 order in for a client right now. I'll report back after cutover to let everyone know how it's going.
Let us know the lead time, actual throughput, and maybe a few trace routes. Are you going through xo or speakeasy?
It's ordered through Speakeasy. I'll keep everyone posted.

eaadams

join:2002-10-25
Sonoma, CA

reply to speakeasy

said by speakeasy:

FYI -- Speakeasy has a sub-60 millisecond latency per their terms of service:

"Speakeasy guarantees a maximum average latency of 60 milliseconds from Customer's router to the nearest gateway on the IP network"

»speakeasy.net/tos/sla_bb.php
What is the significance of this? Good or Bad?

Monday, 13-Feb 12:06:54 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics