 NOYBSt. John 3.16Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1
1 edit | reply to KoolMoe
Re: Off-topic observationTell you what. Subscribe to a major news paper and start a database to track politician scandal articles and log their party affiliation and how prominently it is revealed in the article.
Within article headline.
Lead off sentence of first paragraph.
Within first paragraph.
etc.
Also log which page the article is run on and if it continues to another page and if the party affiliation is buried in a subsequent page.
Report back next year and let us know your findings.
--
Be a Good Netizen - Read, Know & Complain About Overly Restrictive Tyrannical ISP ToS & AUP »comcast.net/terms/ »verizon.net/policies/
Say Thanks with a Tool Points Donation |
|
|
|
 KoolMoeAw ManPremium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD | Yeap, that's what I thought. You really don't have any real proof of this, just your own biased impression.
You're the one making the claim; it's on your shoulders to back it up. If you're not willing to, that's fine...but it also speaks to the validity of your theory.
I don't believe this theory, as I stated, so plainly not my burden to prove yours.
KM |
|
NOYBSt. John 3.16Premium
join:2005-12-15
Forest Grove, OR
kudos:1 |
If you want data, go get your own. I have my data. It is not just a theory, it is a fact that I have witnessed many times in person.
|
|
KoolMoeAw ManPremium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD | Hard to prove a theory without presenting any data, right?
That's all I was asking. If this is true, present the evidence.
If not willing to, makes the theory pretty baseless.
Typical partisan process. Nice. How come you didn't put your party affiliation next to your comment? 
KM |
|
