site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
16776
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Cox HSI Forum FAQ ·Cox HSI forum Links ·WEB Mail ·Cable and Sat TV forum
page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8
AuthorAll Replies


DrThodt_

@cox.net

reply to Evil Mookie

Re: [OK] Netflix Streaming Issue via xbox 360

It technically isn't either of their issues. It's a peering issue, they both talk to different clicks at school.

Netflix I would assume is being delivered via a level 2 isp, and cox is essentially their own level 1 peered with other level 1 isps. Cox can't simply *fix* a peering issue. There are complex bandwidth sharing and aggregation issues, along with deploy physical runs to the peer sites.

It's no magic wand issue.

You *could* figure out how to spoof packets and tell netflix's level 1 where to direct their bgp traffic for optimal delivery. However that is... heh heh heh.


Evil Mookie

@twtelecom.net

reply to bbeesley
Regardless if it is ICMP not replying to the echo or not that is the only visual piece of evidence besides the pathping that's different from Time Warner's traceroute and Cox's. You would have to agree that if the request times out on one hop (say 7 I will post Cox traceroute shortly) then that would cause some delay. When the netflix server checks the bandwith on the Cox route back to me or anyone else on this thread that one hop timing out now translate to latency. If the next hop didn't time out the packet got rerouted somehow. Surely you can see that right?



Evil Mookie

@cox.net

reply to DrThodt_
Doc,

Thanks for the clarification. At this point I'm just frustrated because neither of the two parties are willing to admit there is ever a problem at hand. On the phone with Netflix now. Like I stated before this service worked perfectly a few weeks ago. If I am spending money for services then they should work as close as possible to what it is stated it can do. If Netflix says I should be able to stream video at high quality will a min of 4mb download speed then it should work. I am not the only one having this problem. And even more importantly what changed to bring us to this point.



DrThodt_

@cox.net

Yea 4Mbps should be more than enough, there could be a few issues. If you know the exact server it's attempting to contact you could attempt to do a tracert, there could be some hiccups in the way. For instance last week some people were having issues witht he dallas peer, it had to have temporary runs. The internet is always changing, which is what makes it hard to say hey this is how it's going to be forever.



Evil Mookie

@twtelecom.net

reply to jweber93
Survey says... Cox is the only isp having this problem and I'm willing to bet the farm that anyone on this thread that having this problem now did not have this problem back at the end of Nov 08 or early Dec 08. I think that it is odd that it has taken so long for this issue to come to light.



bbeesley
VIP
join:2003-08-07
Richardson, TX
kudos:4

reply to Evil Mookie

said by Evil Mookie :

You would have to agree that if the request times out on one hop (say 7 I will post Cox traceroute shortly) then that would cause some delay.
Not necessarily - it only means that the hop did not respond to ICMP. See my more detailed explanation here »Re: [OK] Major packet loss--- can't watch video online?

said by Evil Mookie :

If the next hop didn't time out the packet got rerouted somehow. Surely you can see that right?
Actually, that isn't what happens...if the hop was really timing out, packets could not get past that point and you would see your trace die with no other hops showing.


Evil_Mookie

@twtelecom.net

It has been brought to my attention that this is considered a peering issue. Which in my case and anyone else who is suffering from the same problem really sucks. I pay money for an ISP (Cox) and money for a service (Netflix) but because one is unable to resolve an issue (probably related to the almighty "$" at the end of the day then I can't enjoy the other. Again being on the brink of cutting edge technology puts the consumer at a disadvantage. I guess we should all chalk this one up to a lose and be happy it did work initially as it was suppose to. I be kind enough to let friends and family know not to waste their time or money with the streaming service until I can be assured it works properly. Thanks.



CoxTOC1

join:2007-05-15
Newport News, VA
kudos:9

reply to Renaldok
FYI Guys (and Gals):

»www.maximumpc.com/article/news/p···ustrated

»blog.chetweb.com/?p=112

»blog.netflix.com/2008/12/streami···nce.html

We are not the only ISP people are reporting problems on and NetFlix has admitted that they have a problem.



DrThodt_

@cox.net

And there you have it, 3 CoxTOC1. The only one who humbled himself to Google.



Evil Mookie

@twtelecom.net

reply to CoxTOC1
While I will agree that it is obvious others are having this issue all (3) of these articles where posted around the beginning of December (about when I started noticing issues). However when I called Netflix support again the rep stated that this issue had all been acknowledged and resolved. So who exactly do you believe? As a consumer I just want answers and a resolution. I may attempt to contact Netflix to see if a credit is in order for the disruption of service and advise anyone reading this to do the same. If they loss enough cash then they seek to resolve it quicker.



DrThodt_

@cox.net

You know you have to get Microsoft involved.

Whose fault is it?

Cox's connection
Microsoft's product
Netflix's service



Evil_Mookie

@twtelecom.net

True. But you know I think they honest did not play a hand in this one. Besides whating (4) years to change the OS of the Xbox. You have to appreciate the timing of the whole situation.



MarkRH
Premium
join:2005-02-08
Oklahoma City, OK

I don't use Netflix but if you are able to watch the videos on your PC and it's just as bad, can try using the netstat -b command to find out the hostname/ip address of the server that the video is actually streaming from and do a trace route to it.



digiblur
Got Sipura?
Premium
join:2002-06-03
Louisiana

reply to Renaldok
I logged into my PC remotely again today and noticed on the webpage I get the 1 out 3 bars on the webpage for PC viewing. In the evening get 1 bar.

Tonight I'm going to go talk to my neighbor with AT&T. I should be able to see his wireless signal and mine from the back porch. I'll flip back and forth and see what kind of differences I get in video quality bars and tracerts. I'll post them as soon as I get them.
--
Make your Sipura/PAP2 speak. »www.voipurize.com
SouthWest Louisiana PC Users Group »www.swlapcug.com



Evil Mookie

@twtelecom.net

Just got a call back from the Cox rep supervisor. They are going to notify Qwest of the issue. I asked if they could manually change the route on the switch I'm connected to he said it would severely impact my connection. My speed "she's a fast but the route no good".



CoxTOC1

join:2007-05-15
Newport News, VA
kudos:9

Evil Mookie,

I don't know what supervisor would have told you that but that's not how it works. They do not have the authority to contact any of our peering partners.

As far as changing your route, we are using the route that has been announced by Qwest as the most efficient (fastest) route to get you their.



Evil_Mookie

@twtelecom.net

So I got the lame excuse but nicely on the returned callback. There's no way a cox employee can professionally advise a peering parnter of an issue on their network. That sucks. I can't call Qwest and complain because I'm not a patron of their service. This in never gonna get fixed. I might as well cancel my Netflix subscription. Thanks for the heads up.



DrThodt_

@cox.net

reply to Renaldok
I demand net nuetrality!



CoxTOC1

join:2007-05-15
Newport News, VA
kudos:9

reply to Evil_Mookie

said by Evil_Mookie :

There's no way a cox employee can professionally advise a peering parnter of an issue on their network.
That's not what I said, Their is only one group of people who can contact our peering partners about this type of issue. They are already aware of this issue. All we can do is go "hey guys looks like their may be a problem over here." to our peering partner (In this case Level3). What or if they (Level3) do anything is beyond our control.

As far as calling Qwest, you are more than welcome to try and call them. Back "In the day (tm)" (Before I worked for Cox and worked at another ISP) I used to call other peering providers to complain about latency on their networks all the time. What if anything they did with my complaints I'll never know.


Evil_Mookie

@cox.net

So you're like PR control for Cox. Besides myself and a few others you have the most post on this thread. You know if I wasn't an honest individual (say I was really shady) this could easily leak to the media as a bad spin for you guys. Say hypothecically that this issue persists then one could easily believe or assume the peering issue wasn't resolved on purpose because you (Cox) offer a video on demand service as well. I mean how often to competiting companies "team up" when they have similar products or services. Especially with the way things are going with economy and all. "Cox won't peer with Qwest Networks to corner market on video streaming media." The lot of media outlets could have a field day with this story. It only takes a little imagination. But I guess you can see how easily a frustrated customer can create a nightmare for a large company.

page: 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8

Thursday, 31-May 22:32:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics