RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| Re: While more affordable... said by iansltx  :uTP...erm...UDP FTW! Which of my two comments (The 1MBs Uplink or the Caps) is this in reference to? In either case, I am not able to determine what your reply means. | |
|
 iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO | Re: While more affordable... Neither. UDP doesn't reuqire ACKs so less overhead so you can actually get 50 Mbps of downstream speed on your cable connection  Until you hit the cap that is... | |
|
 |
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| Re: While more affordable... said by iansltx :Neither. UDP doesn't reuqire ACKs so less overhead so you can actually get 50 Mbps of downstream speed on your cable connection Until you hit the cap that is... True BUT a download needs TCP not UDP flow since you have to do arrival handshakes to insure you get all the packets. UDP is only useful for streaming type downloads (ViOP/Video) as opposed to the file copy/transfer type operations that I was talking about. | |
|
| | iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO | Re: While more affordable... ...though uTorrent is using uTP for file transfers now, and it's going over UDP... | |
|
|
|
|
