Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » [TWC] what could these "localhost" connections be?
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1176
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Using Autoruns to compare clean state to current »
« Router setup problem  
AuthorAll Replies
-

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC


1 edit
reply to TheWiseGuy
Re: [TWC] what could these "localhost" connections be?

said by TheWiseGuy See Profile :

Now since in this case they are established versus listening, as was the case in the other example, you may be correct, all 4 sockets/ports may be simply for pollable events.
I show four lines for the Firefox sockets. Each line treats one of the endpoints as local, the other as remote. Two loopback connections have four endpoints.
I used 'netstat -ano' to get the ProcessID#. Windows Task Manager identified ProcessID# 5936 as Firefox.

--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

TheWiseGuy
Dog And Butterfly
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-04
Yonkers, NY

reply to jimkyle
Yes I understand that you need a pair of ports/sockets for one connection. I should have made it clear that I was talking about ports/sockets not connections. From the post by EG that I cited

said by a firefox programmer :

I don't know how to implement NSPR pollable events
on Windows without using a pair of TCP sockets,
Now since in this case they are established versus listening, as was the case in the other example, you may be correct, all 4 sockets/ports may be simply for pollable events. Still in reading the complete reference I am not sure there should be more then 2 sockets/ports for the pollable events cited by that programmer, though it would make sense since the connection to check for a pollable event would be made to the listening socket and there normally are 2 listening ports/sockets.
--
Warning, If you post nonsense and use misinformation and are here to argue based on those methods, you will be put on ignore.


jimkyle
Btrieve Guy
Premium
join:2002-10-20
Oklahoma City, OK
reply to TheWiseGuy
Each loopback connection uses two ports, one for each end of the connection. You can see that the first two are connected to each other, as are the next two, in the OP's report. Thus the first four probably represent the two Firefox connections...

TheWiseGuy
Dog And Butterfly
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-04
Yonkers, NY

reply to adam1221
Localhost is 127.0.0.1 and is Loopback on your computer. You can make sure that it is 127.0.0.1 by running netstat -n

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Localhost

It is the way a program talks to itself. Firefox uses 2 of these for Pollable events

»www2.dslreports.com/forum/remark···12761500

I am not sure how the other 2 are used but since the packets never leave your computer there should be no need to worry about connections only to Localhost.
--
Warning, If you post nonsense and use misinformation and are here to argue based on those methods, you will be put on ignore.


amysheehan
Premium,VIP,MVM
join:1999-12-21
Huntington Beach, CA
reply to adam1221
I've asked the mods to move your topic to Security for follow up


adam1221

@rr.com

 [TWC] what could these "localhost" connections be?

Hello,

I am seeing this when I do a netstat
C:\Documents and Settings\user>netstat

Active Connections

Proto Local Address Foreign Address State
TCP asus:1042 localhost:1043 ESTABLISHED
TCP asus:1043 localhost:1042 ESTABLISHED
TCP asus:1045 localhost:1046 ESTABLISHED
TCP asus:1046 localhost:1045 ESTABLISHED
TCP asus:5152 localhost:1044 CLOSE_WAIT

I see all of these localhost connections when I open my firefox browser. I first thought it might be spyware or something, so I did a complete re-partition and re-format

After the format though I seem to have not seen it the first couple days but now...I am seeing again.

Any ideas? Is this normal?
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityUsing Autoruns to compare clean state to current »
« Router setup problem  


Friday, 11-Dec 00:20:23 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [138] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [87] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [76] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] Average American Consumes 34 Gigabytes Daily
· [58] AT&T: iPhone Data Pricing Comments 'Taken Out Of Context'
· [52] Sprint, T-Mobile Merger Rumor Lives
Most people now reading
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· What frequency is better for a 25+ mile link [Wireless Service Providers]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]
· Internet access from TV [Verizon FIOS TV]
· New 5 mans full walk through [World of Warcraft]