republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » [TWC] what could these "localhost" connections be?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Using Autoruns to compare clean state to current »
« Router setup problem  
AuthorAll Replies
-

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC


1 edit
reply to TheWiseGuy
Re: [TWC] what could these "localhost" connections be?

said by TheWiseGuy See Profile :

Now since in this case they are established versus listening, as was the case in the other example, you may be correct, all 4 sockets/ports may be simply for pollable events.
I show four lines for the Firefox sockets. Each line treats one of the endpoints as local, the other as remote. Two loopback connections have four endpoints.
I used 'netstat -ano' to get the ProcessID#. Windows Task Manager identified ProcessID# 5936 as Firefox.

--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

TheWiseGuy
Dog And Butterfly
Premium,MVM
join:2002-07-04
Yonkers, NY

reply to jimkyle
Yes I understand that you need a pair of ports/sockets for one connection. I should have made it clear that I was talking about ports/sockets not connections. From the post by EG that I cited

said by a firefox programmer :

I don't know how to implement NSPR pollable events
on Windows without using a pair of TCP sockets,
Now since in this case they are established versus listening, as was the case in the other example, you may be correct, all 4 sockets/ports may be simply for pollable events. Still in reading the complete reference I am not sure there should be more then 2 sockets/ports for the pollable events cited by that programmer, though it would make sense since the connection to check for a pollable event would be made to the listening socket and there normally are 2 listening ports/sockets.
--
Warning, If you post nonsense and use misinformation and are here to argue based on those methods, you will be put on ignore.


jimkyle
Btrieve Guy
Premium
join:2002-10-20
Oklahoma City, OK
reply to TheWiseGuy
Each loopback connection uses two ports, one for each end of the connection. You can see that the first two are connected to each other, as are the next two, in the OP's report. Thus the first four probably represent the two Firefox connections...
Forums » Up and Running » Security » SecurityUsing Autoruns to compare clean state to current »
« Router setup problem  


Friday, 04-Dec 14:18:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [117] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [99] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [76] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· Linux is terrorist - according to MS... [All Things Unix]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· An Excellent Guide About Google Voice And Sip Sorcery [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]