<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Karl...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711018</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:51:25 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:51:25 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21714556</link>
<description><![CDATA[IGGY posted : "You just don't get great ratings in those magazines without doing anything."<br><br>While some people may question the results for various reasons. I think most people would consider Consumer Reports fairly unbiased over the years. The taking no advertising may just be a marketing ploy but I don't think it is. At the very least it takes some of the pay to play aspect out of the equation. Unless you aware of something the rest of us aren't.<br><br>I would agree that some sites have questionable reviews do to who they accept advertising from. But this isn't always the case. I can tell you that over the years I've been critical of many companies that help pay my bills some months. <br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://iggyz.com">Test PC Security<br>Cable Diagnostics<br>Blog<br>ZoneAlarm Help</a> Vista x64  Comcast BroadVox Direct</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21714556</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:35:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21714170</link>
<description><![CDATA[en102 posted : Unfortunately, Uverse is a little out to lunch on many parts here in Los Angeles - Uverse Internet + TV, phone is by POTS only.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21714170</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 01:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711654</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : What???????????]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711654</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:08:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711448</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Got to spend 50 minutes listening to Comcast's loverly royalty-free hold music loop on Wednesday, so the are still valiantly shooting for the bottom of the customer-service pile.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711448</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:02:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711313</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : I'm not sure anybody should take these results too seriously. Services differ so drastically by geography and yes, billing and billing support for several of these well ranked companies is absolutely atrocious....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711313</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:38:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711285</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : Thanks for the new image. I've plugged it in.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711285</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:32:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711283</link>
<description><![CDATA[HarleyYac posted : Karl,<br>    Funny .. But Billing?????? It has gotten much better but I still had to call for Credit due to a Faulty VOD push last month.Obviously the "Guide" was not factored in :P <br>Good work !!!<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711283</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:32:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711241</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/141383" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=141383');">Karl Bode</a>:</small><br><br> I've updated the piece with TK's more complete survey results; not sure why the first image he submitted omitted AT&T.<br> </div>The original story link pointed to the wrong chart(it was an older one). The story now has the correct charts.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711241</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:27:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711096</link>
<description><![CDATA[Karl Bode posted : <div class="bquote">More anti-cable/copper junk, pro fiber.</div><div class="bquote">you mean anti-cable pro Telco.</div>I say he's pro-puppy murder!<br><br>You've seen through my effort to destroy the cable industry by pretending they consistently perform poorly in consumer satisfaction studies. I've updated the piece with TK's more complete survey result .jpg; not sure why the first image he submitted omitted AT&T, but it wasn't a part of a secret cabal...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711096</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:06:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711085</link>
<description><![CDATA[hottboiinnc posted : you mean anti-cable pro Telco.<br><br>You just don't get great ratings in those magazines without doing anything. ;)  I bet if you go back and ask the same few "customers" they asked if they knew the difference between FiOS over cable they'll tell you no.  Or U-Verse over Cable. They won't except tell you what AT$T or VZ's sales reps told them. <br><br>And also this was back before AT$T and VZ announced price increases. $10 more for 100 channels on U-Verse HA! Yes 100 channels for $64 you can't count those "U-Verse" channels as they're "customer information" and you can't count music channels either.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711085</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:04:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711045</link>
<description><![CDATA[ThrowDemsOut posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1550577" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1550577');">baineschile</a>:</small><br><br>How can you say that "people love the triple play from Uverse" when its not even on that list!?!?<br><br>More anti-cable/copper junk, pro fiber.<br> </div>Here is the latest Triple Play chart:<br><br>[att=1]<br><br>The one in the story was a 2008 chart.<br><br>But the new chart doesn't change the accuracy of the original story 1 bit.<br><br>Of course, Consumer Reports listing U-Verse as fiber based is misleading. Because if you can call U-Verse fiber based you could call all these services(incl all the cable companies) fiber based because they are all at least FTTN at heart.<br><br>P.S. Hybrid means satellite TV is part of the pkg.<br><small>--<br><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/bqv2h"><b>My BLOG ..</b></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/2a9xcb"><i> .. Internet News ..</i></a><A HREF="http://tinyurl.com/yz8xto"><b> .. My Web Page</b></a><br>Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?</small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21711045?c=1388207&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTcxMTA0NS54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="55648 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=511 HEIGHT=509 SRC="/r0/download/1388207~56a8637adb7fa5b2bb5265c6eb1ff80d/tripleplay.JPG"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711045</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:59:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711034</link>
<description><![CDATA[ptrowski posted : Karl didn't, the article stated it.  That picture doesn't necessarily come from the study as you have to pay to get the results.  <br><br>"Verizon FiOS and AT&T U-verse, whose networks are fiber-optic based, were the most consistently satisfying providers for their Internet, television, and telephone services," reported Consumers Union, who publishes the magazine. "In areas where telco-delivered service is not available, a highly-rated cable company is the next-best choice for many households," says Consumer Reports. <br><small>--<br>"So, Lone Star, now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb."<br><br>Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?  &raquo;<A HREF="http://www.venganza.org" >www.venganza.org</A></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Karl-21711034</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:58:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Karl...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Karl-21711018</link>
<description><![CDATA[baineschile posted : How can you say that "people love the triple play from Uverse" when its not even on that list!?!?<br><br>More anti-cable/copper junk, pro fiber.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Karl-21711018</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:56:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

