republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » IPTV On The Xbox 360 Not Dead Yet » Bandwidth caps are not relevant to IPTV
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
64
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

MyDogHsFleas
Premium
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T Southwest


1 edit
Bandwidth caps are not relevant to IPTV

As I've pointed out many times in these forums, comparing U-verse TV to streaming video over the Internet to your PC, and then crying foul because there are bandwidth caps coming on the streaming video but not on the TV stream, is a complete non sequitur.

When you make this comparison, you are either simply not paying attention to the facts involved, or you are deliberately ignoring them for the sake of promulgating an inane anti-AT&T conspiracy theory.

Why? It's simple. With U-verse IPTV, one video channel essentially equals one single video stream on the network, FOR ALL USERS. So if there are 50,000 users watching a show, there's only ONE STREAM ON THE BACKBONE.

By contrast, if those same 50,000 users are watching streaming video from a server to their PC, that's 50,000 SEPARATE VIDEO STREAMS ON THE BACKBONE.

So, the statement "They are going to cap my Internet, that's anti-competitive, they just want me to use their TV service instead of streaming/downloaded video on my PC!" turns out to be completely unsupportable crap.


Mr Anon

@sbcglobal.net

I too dislike the argument about this as it is too shallow. There are caps on the IntErnet not IntRAnet and one stream per channels as you state.

One could argue that traffic that never has to leave the network although it's destination is public should also not count towards the cap (AT&T customer to AT&T customer) however the one downfall would be complexity.

I don't think it would take too much to allow the 360 to work as from what I can see of media room it seems to have a great relationship with Media Center and extenders which that is exactly what a 360 is. With that being said I do hope this happens, happens, soon and that we get Media Sharing soon since they are are taking away flickr pro accounts.


Wizeguy

join:2008-08-23
Safety Harbor, FL

reply to MyDogHsFleas
Say it was IPTV but wireless live cable TV direct from your computer to your TV Screen or wireless device (Laptop, I-Phone etc). Watch Cable and Network shows just like you do know when you sit down on your couch.Zero Bandwidth caps because it's not streaming video it's live from the Network. Would that be cool or what!!!
-
Forums » IPTV On The Xbox 360 Not Dead Yet


Friday, 04-Dec 11:13:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [144] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [110] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [92] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [72] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [70] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Equal speeds ruling [Canadian Broadband]
· An Excellent Guide About Google Voice And Sip Sorcery [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Usenet Services- Clarification [TekSavvy]
· Many Sites Unreachable [Rogers]
· [WotLK] Doing away w/ conquest? [World of Warcraft]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]