<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21722334</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:11:50 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:11:50 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21731368</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><b>elray</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hescominsoon <A HREF="/useremail/u/772673"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  elray <A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Except that your cell phone 911 will not work, and "the regular number" WILL NOT WORK when you have that life-threatening situation.<br><br>I have the unfortunate opportunity to test these facilities more often than I'd like.  Cell-phone 911 is not viable (yet).  Dialing the PSAP directly is hit-n-miss, in other words, you can literally "die trying".<br><br>Are you willing risk your life for $17 a month?<br>(That's what we pay for Verizon POTS).<br> </div>typical fear mongering.  I have nothing but cell phones and 911 has always worked just fine.  I have had a couple of major accidents befall my family in the wintertime and the cell phone has always worked.  I can tell you right now if there is a big enough calamity to take out all of the cell towers in my area the landlines are going to be gone as well(think katrina..landlines did you no good there..it was the HAM operators that saved the comm day there). <br> </div>No, real world experience.  In Los Angeles, our police dispatch does not respond to cell phones well (911 doesn't route consistently, sometimes doesn't go through at all); the PSAP doesn't answer when you dial direct, and the local precinct won't dispatch.  Only 911 from a landline results in a response when you need it.<br><br>I'm not concerned about Katrina-like situations.  If one isn't personally prepared for such, no 911 system is going to help you, nor are a group of ham operators.<br><br>I'm worried about preventable, recoverable, everyday life-threatening situations that actually happen - heart attack, stroke, shootings, stabbings, fires, burglaries, and assaults.  It is not that other technologies can't be made 99% reliable, but they just aren't, so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21731368</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:23:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21731268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><b>elray</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wwdubbia <A HREF="/useremail/u/639703"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>show me your Verizon bill for $17 and I'll believe you.  You're flat rate plan is probably $17, but then you need to add your line cost on top of that, plus taxes/fees.<br><br>It's probably more like $50 after taxes.<br> </div>$17 gets us a measured rate line with a $3 usage credit, taxes included.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21731268</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:57:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21730241</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I've had charter voip for about 3 years and I have to mute my tv because it is so clear. Your in-laws probably got some old wiring in their house have them plug directly into the EMTA and see if it isn't better. Also I'd recommend wire maintenance for them if they can't correctly re-wire the home.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21730241</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:56:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728637</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/897844"><b>N3OGH</b></A> : As a person who lives alone, and as a first responder, I would never recommend anyone relying solely on a cell phone or VoIP phone for summonsing emergency responders.<br><br>I had the unfortunate experience of dealing with Vonage's 911 a few years back.  It was bad.<br><br>For $17/mo it IS worth it to have a POTS line.<br><br>And I know a lot of people say folks rely on 911 too much.  That's just bullshit.  You tell me that when you've nicked a femoral artery while using power tools, and you're bleeding like a damn stuck pig.<br><br>I'm usually the first person on scene for the medical calls in my town when I'm working (we beat the medics routinely) and I can't tell you the number of people that have saved their own lives due to a 911 call.<br><br>Best $17/mo I spend IMHO...  <br><small>--<br>Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power&#133;</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728637</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:18:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1540952"><b>mod_wastrel</b></A> : Fore-warned is fore-armed. Plan for failure. (However, to each his/her own.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728380</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:36:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728315</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : Fear mongering huh? <br><br>Cell phones - unreliable as they are radio waves and are subject to far more issues than a closed wired service. However, your luck with 911 has been great!<br><br>I can show you land line service that is 100% underground from the home to the CO to the rest of the network before it even thinks of going over head.. maybe an earthquake in that area would have been a bad thing at the time.<br><br>When you go into learning to be that HAM soldier, why don't you ask them, while you're at it, if that giant HAM radio antenna is stronger than any cell phone tower or land line pole that you use to broadcast with, okay?<br><br>The fact is that while you're trying to pass over something that has been PROVEN to be a lifeline service as trivial and "fear mongering" you failed to look at your own savior's weaknesses. <br><br>I'm sorry to that but it still is a gamble that your cell phone, even, though while still my best 2nd choice, is going to be your life line over a proven reliable land line service in an emergency. It's not fear mongering to say that it's a gamble to take reliability out of the picture in the chance of emergency. And further, it only takes the 1 time that you can't make that call over your "cell phone" and before you get your HAM radio up and running (ugh) before you're personally affected and crying foul IF your cell phone failed you in an emergency. <br><br>The people on the Titanic probably never once thought about the life boat situation on the ship until it was sinking and they needed them either. Look what happened after that... we've already had issues with cell phones in emergencies and looks what's changed because of it? (and its still not 'perfect'..) Look at the issues with provider based VoIP services and the mandatory E911 services.. you think that it's all fear mongering still..?<br><br>... I support your right to believe what you want, but you can keep the fear mongering call out of this one as it will only make you look a fool. Oh, and again, if you do have an issue, and you do have that one time you can't get through right away and something bad happens, PLEASE don't come here rallying the troops to bitch with you becuase I'll be happy to break and violate EVER T.O.S. term here to rub in your loss. :)<br><br>There is a real problem, in SOME cases, in this country with the lack of resolve in people.. 9/11, no matter what anyone believes happened that day, 3,000 people still died and two 100 story towers fell. The country AT LARGE kept it on their minds for a few months, and not quite long enough, before getting on with life. Sorry, but this sort of mentality is just move of the same. Emergencies and accidents are never planned. Not to mention, how you respond to them is very important even though its very unlikely that many will. But, it's that ONE point of failure that can and will turn your life upside down and you'll never be the same. Many "fear mongering" claimants used to believe what you did, until the one point of failure and then many of them became activists for their cause. Just keep that in mind when you balk at the wired phone line that has been proven effective for many many years in this country and will continue to be for many more.<br><br>Have a good one. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21728315</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:27:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726266</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1540952"><b>mod_wastrel</b></A> : A no-frills POTS line from Verizon costs at least a few dollars less than $17 (total)--varies some with locality. If I remember correctly (always questionable), POTS is 911 and everything else is E911 (VoIP and cell), though a recently enacted law (?) will require the telcos to open up 911 centers directly to non-telcos. My point being that if someone feels safe only with 911, then it could be worth it for the "peace of mind" to pay the little extra for true 911 you used to only get with POTS (and I don't know the schedule required by that law as far as providing access to the 911 centers--could be awhile knowing the telcos). But all of this has little to do with using a phone to make calls for the sake of conversation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726266</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:43:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/772673"><b>hescominsoon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  elray <A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  aaronwt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I dropped my land line a few months ago to use my cell phone as my primary service. <br>...<br>For 911 service I will be using my cell phone, although I've never had to use 911. I've had to call the police and fire dept. before, but not in a life threatening situation, so 911 wouldn't apply to those situations. You use the regular number instead of tying up 911 service like most of the calls they receive for 911 that aren't really emergencies.<br><br> </div>Except that your cell phone 911 will not work, and "the regular number" WILL NOT WORK when you have that life-threatening situation.<br><br>I have the unfortunate opportunity to test these facilities more often than I'd like.  Cell-phone 911 is not viable (yet).  Dialing the PSAP directly is hit-n-miss, in other words, you can literally "die trying".<br><br>Are you willing risk your life for $17 a month?<br>(That's what we pay for Verizon POTS).<br> </div>typical fear mongering.  I have nothing but cell phones and 911 has always worked just fine.  I have had a couple of major accidents befall my family in the wintertime and the cell phone has always worked.  I can tell you right now if there is a big enough calamity to take out all of the cell towers in my area the landlines are going to be gone as well(think katrina..landlines did you no good there..it was the HAM operators that saved the comm day there).  I'm in training to join the ranks of Ham radio operators.  That's a service that works irregardless of the infrastructure destruction.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726201</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726173</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/639703"><b>wwdubbia</b></A> : show me your Verizon bill for $17 and I'll believe you.  You're flat rate plan is probably $17, but then you need to add your line cost on top of that, plus taxes/fees.<br><br>It's probably more like $50 after taxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726173</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:26:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726120</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  battleop <A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</small><br><br>Uh yea...  Shame on me for not having a DVR on every TV I own or might watch.    <br> </div>:) yes shame on you. this is the 21st century. I've had a DVR(TiVo) on every TV for many years now.<br>And prior to that I used VCRs. I started Time Shifting some of my TV watching in 1984, and since then I've rarely watched commercials. By 1989 I was time shifting 95% of my TV watching.<br>A DVR just makes it so much easier. The idea of watching TV in real time just scares me. Wasting almost 20 minutes of every hour of programming on commercials.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726120</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:15:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  elray <A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  aaronwt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I dropped my land line a few months ago to use my cell phone as my primary service. <br>...<br>For 911 service I will be using my cell phone, although I've never had to use 911. I've had to call the police and fire dept. before, but not in a life threatening situation, so 911 wouldn't apply to those situations. You use the regular number instead of tying up 911 service like most of the calls they receive for 911 that aren't really emergencies.<br><br> </div>Except that your cell phone 911 will not work, and "the regular number" WILL NOT WORK when you have that life-threatening situation.<br><br>I have the unfortunate opportunity to test these facilities more often than I'd like.  Cell-phone 911 is not viable (yet).  Dialing the PSAP directly is hit-n-miss, in other words, you can literally "die trying".<br><br>Are you willing risk your life for $17 a month?<br>(That's what we pay for Verizon POTS).<br> </div>Then you need to tell that to the emergency providers around here who have responded to 911 calls over cell phones sucessfully.<br><br>I don't know about Magic Jack for 911. Although It does have the proper info with my address for 911.<br>I'll have to ask some friends if they've responded to any emergencies from people who dialed 911 using Magic JAck. I know they have from Cell phone users without any issues.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726105</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:09:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726099</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : Uh yea...  Shame on me for not having a DVR on every TV I own or might watch.    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21726099</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:08:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Hi,<br>  I just picked up MJ for a second line. So far so Good! I cannot believe the quality. <br>  The funny thing about it is I did a search on the number and the ILEC is Cablevison/Lightpath. I cannot verify how accurate it is.<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725742</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:44:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725489</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/264898"><b>elray</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  aaronwt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I dropped my land line a few months ago to use my cell phone as my primary service. <br>...<br>For 911 service I will be using my cell phone, although I've never had to use 911. I've had to call the police and fire dept. before, but not in a life threatening situation, so 911 wouldn't apply to those situations. You use the regular number instead of tying up 911 service like most of the calls they receive for 911 that aren't really emergencies.<br><br> </div>Except that your cell phone 911 will not work, and "the regular number" WILL NOT WORK when you have that life-threatening situation.<br><br>I have the unfortunate opportunity to test these facilities more often than I'd like.  Cell-phone 911 is not viable (yet).  Dialing the PSAP directly is hit-n-miss, in other words, you can literally "die trying".<br><br>Are you willing risk your life for $17 a month?<br>(That's what we pay for Verizon POTS).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725489</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:15:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725163</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/233222"><b>Frank</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  battleop <A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Thanks for encouraging the 4 minute commercials they run.  I don't care if it's the best service ever, I will never give them a dime.  <br> </div>it's your own fault for watching commercials period.<br><br>Buy, Rent, or Make a DVR.<br><small>--<br>At first I thought everyone on the highway was drunk but then I realized I was driving in Florida ;)</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21725163</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:12:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723838</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : While I don't count on Skype as primary phone line (I have cable VoIP), I do use it as a second line to dial out and do video conferencing.  For $36/year, its a cheap dialout + video conferencing.  I wouldn't recommend it for use as a primary line (eg. I'd recommend it as a compliment to a cell phone - cheaper than adding tons of minutes, and it will do Canada calling for free).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723838</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:33:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723440</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><b>iansltx</b></A> : I could care less about commercials. Don't have TV. But whatever floats your boat...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723440</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:25:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723342</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1540952"><b>mod_wastrel</b></A> : ???... there are commercials that <i>aren't</i> annoying?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723342</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:05:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723250</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : I think you are not catching on as to why I wouldn't give magicjack a dime.  It's the same reason that wouldn't buy Vince's ShamWOW or anything that Billy Maze peddles.  I won't buy an x10 Camera or anything else from any one who runs an annoying commercial.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21723250</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:49:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : MAGIC JACK was a bonus for me. I dropped my land line a few months ago to use my cell phone as my primary service. But the call quality from my cell phone has never been close to land line quality. I was using a Dock N talk with the Bluetooth connection on my cell phone so I could use my 1.9GHz(DECT 6.0) cordless phones while at home. That worked fine, but again, since it's going over the cell, the quality is the same as the cell.<br>So then I tried the Magic Jack after a coworker turned me on to it. <br>So I dumped my Dock N Talk and got an Xlink BTTN unit. It works like the Dock N Talk, linking with the cell phone over it's BT connection, but it also allows up to three cell phones, and a land line. So for the land line port I am using the Magic Jack. So for all outgoing or incoming calls I can use either line. Although I will mainly be using the cell line for incoming and the Magic Jack for outgoing calls. <br>For 911 service I will be using my cell phone, although I've never had to use 911. I've had to call the police and fire dept. before, but not in a life threatening situation, so 911 wouldn't apply to those situations. You use the regular number instead of tying up 911 service like most of the calls they receive for 911 that aren't really emergencies.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  fiberguy <A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Great. It works for you. Glad your computer has become an ATA device for what should be treated as a lifeline service. <br><br>Now, back to reality where the air exists and water is required to sustain life. <br><br>MAGIC JACK IS NOT "PHONE SERVICE"... it's a toy, plain and simple. If I were to rank the phone services out there are sustainability:<br><br>POTS<br>Cable Switched Service<br>Cable managed VoIP Service / Fiber VoIP (FiOS, Surewest)<br>Cell Phones<br>3rd Party Vonage, etc<br>Two-Cans & String<br>Skype<br>MagicJack<br><br>MJ is a ponzi scheme waiting for the breaking news that will be the next shocking news cycle story, which isn't a shocker to some of us already. If anyone knows anything about MJ and its model, and how it plays with the rest of the PSTN, MJ can't survive. It will eventually hit it's plateau and the service will go dead. <br><br>This service is a joke. (Yes, I have it and I've used it. The service sits in the drawer now) Not only does this "phone service" require internet connections (which is fine) it also relies on the stability of your PC, as you/we know, that has to remain powered up AND not crashed or sleeping.<br><br>Vonage finds that many people are not too keen on the notion of having to self serve their home phone needs. They're not happy with having to do their own installs (which is why they now have installer teams same as satellite did years ago) they find that people are not keen on having to reboot/power cycle their phone box, and people don't want to be passed around between providers when there's an issue with the service. (All proven facts)<br><br>Now comes MJ being pushed as a "real player in the phone business".. HAH! MagicJack is really nothing more, in my opinion, than a service like Skype that can plug into your phone jack. However, the boob that "invented it" is playing people with the claims. $20 a year isn't sustainable - the service WILL go dark and probably not too far into the future as there are already signs of it.<br><br>Some of these "vision changers" think that people are going to simply give up stability for price. It took many years for the cell phone industry to even gain the status that it could be used as the only phone, and even then, people still complain about dropped calls, call clarity, and reliability.<br><br>MJ is hardly a phone service at all. Just becuase it can 'make a phone call' doesn't make it a phone service.. at best, as it stands, MJ is largely a techies toy. <br><br>Continue to use it, rave about it, praise it's ability to fit your needs, but DON'T call it phone service. I would NEVER port my primary, established, or important phone number to any company that doesn't stand behind its product or is held to standards by any authority that will ensure they are a sustainable provider. <br><br>To be honest, if government EVER did one thing right, they'd bar ANYONE from providing "phone service" or a service called "dial tone" to the end user in this country unless they followed rules and had oversight by the FCC. Phone service in the US is just FAR too important to allow children to hawk a service to the consumer made to believe that what they are getting is "phone service" which is largely compared to that of the likes of a reliable POTS service.<br><br>my 2-cents<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722905</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:39:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722834</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567879"><b>Kearnstd</b></A> : however if you have something like MJ and your cable goes down,  dont expect rush service just because it is also your phone line when you dont have their phone service.  and i agree with their stance on how they handle that.<br><small>--<br>[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722834</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:27:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722761</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/235538"><b>lucky178</b></A> : unfortunately i have to agree magic jack is horrid i have not been able to use it for 2 months now. when it worked service was very iffy, it would disconnect for no reason or not receive inbound calls. when I plug magic jack in, my computers will no longer recognize it. i tried magic jack tech support and they had me download several "fixes" and it still cannot be recognized by my computers. i have vista and xp. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722761</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 16:15:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722564</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1440579"><b>iansltx</b></A> : I'm cell-only, plus MagicJack. For long conversations, I pick up the phone and make a MJ call. MJ actually is more reliable than my cell; here in Colorado I sometimes have to place a call twice...first one's a fast budy. Other than that, the cellular service is crystal clear.<br><br>MagicJack? As long as my internet isn't wonky, it's crystal clear too, and unlimited.<br><br>Just because I'm paying less per year for my RJ-11 phone service than anyone else is no cause for strife. No, I don't count my broadband bill into the mix because I use that connection for other stuff.<br><br>Yes, I can get a landline, but what would I use it for? 99.9% of calls I make are long-distance from here, and even a basic line would cost me $20+ per month. Plus long distance. No thanks.<br><br>YMMV, yes But cellular plus VoIP has proved quite reliable for me. If you think MagicJack should die and everyone should move to VoIP provided by the people who run your internet cables, be my guest...but I'd like $40 per month from you to cover Comcast Digital Voice.<br><br>When the price differential is that big, whaddya gonna do?<br><br>Still, MagicJack isn't for everyone. I'd be hesitant to run a high-volume business line over the service, and they don't have local numbers everywhere. Then again, only cable and telco VoIP have local numbers back home, as far as oIP stuff goes anyway. So, realistically, I' pay $30/month for unlimited, full-featured VoIP with a local number from my cable or telco provider. No added texas or fees. If they want a penny more of my money, I want crazy does-the-dishes-for-yu features. Got it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722564</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:49:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722386</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  seaquake <A HREF="/useremail/u/351663"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>$15 a month for unlimited local, long distance and other services and I'll be impressed.  That's assuming the quality is there.  I've heard my in-laws Charter VOIP and it sounds like 1960's mission control.  Actually, I'm exaggerating.  Charter didn't sound *that* good. </div>I'd be impressed too,.. however, not ever likely to happen. Well, it COULD happen, BUT, expect the price of broadband to rise to compensate for it. <br><br>What people forget is that the companies aren't pricing the product, necessarily for the end-user alone. They have to sustain a certain about of income to *sustain* their entire business. <br><br>People think that if Voip ruled the world today that the providers could simply cut their incoming by about $25 per customer. (do the math to calculate the loss)<br><br>Now, back to reality. Even the HSI service has to travel over lines. Those lines are the same as what carried the POTS service. Those same lines still are subject to the same damage, wear and tear, change maintenance, etc. If your phone service goes down, then your HSI can still go down. <br><br>So, if the TRANSPORT METHOD changed to VoIP, how do you all suspect it's going to change the landscape of the.. well.. the network? <br><br>The only major change from analog to voip is that it's not all analog any more, rather, its data, and as we know both voice and data all travel down the same lines. <br><br>So, unless we move to an all wireless network in this country, which we have the option to - and don't - expect that prices will never drop to $15 a month.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722386</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:28:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1206900"><b>fiberguy</b></A> : Great. It works for you. Glad your computer has become an ATA device for what should be treated as a lifeline service. <br><br>Now, back to reality where the air exists and water is required to sustain life. <br><br>MAGIC JACK IS NOT "PHONE SERVICE"... it's a toy, plain and simple. If I were to rank the phone services out there are sustainability:<br><br>POTS<br>Cable Switched Service<br>Cable managed VoIP Service / Fiber VoIP (FiOS, Surewest)<br>Cell Phones<br>3rd Party Vonage, etc<br>Two-Cans & String<br>Skype<br>MagicJack<br><br>MJ is a ponzi scheme waiting for the breaking news that will be the next shocking news cycle story, which isn't a shocker to some of us already. If anyone knows anything about MJ and its model, and how it plays with the rest of the PSTN, MJ can't survive. It will eventually hit it's plateau and the service will go dead. <br><br>This service is a joke. (Yes, I have it and I've used it. The service sits in the drawer now) Not only does this "phone service" require internet connections (which is fine) it also relies on the stability of your PC, as you/we know, that has to remain powered up AND not crashed or sleeping.<br><br>Vonage finds that many people are not too keen on the notion of having to self serve their home phone needs. They're not happy with having to do their own installs (which is why they now have installer teams same as satellite did years ago) they find that people are not keen on having to reboot/power cycle their phone box, and people don't want to be passed around between providers when there's an issue with the service. (All proven facts)<br><br>Now comes MJ being pushed as a "real player in the phone business".. HAH! MagicJack is really nothing more, in my opinion, than a service like Skype that can plug into your phone jack. However, the boob that "invented it" is playing people with the claims. $20 a year isn't sustainable - the service WILL go dark and probably not too far into the future as there are already signs of it.<br><br>Some of these "vision changers" think that people are going to simply give up stability for price. It took many years for the cell phone industry to even gain the status that it could be used as the only phone, and even then, people still complain about dropped calls, call clarity, and reliability.<br><br>MJ is hardly a phone service at all. Just becuase it can 'make a phone call' doesn't make it a phone service.. at best, as it stands, MJ is largely a techies toy. <br><br>Continue to use it, rave about it, praise it's ability to fit your needs, but DON'T call it phone service. I would NEVER port my primary, established, or important phone number to any company that doesn't stand behind its product or is held to standards by any authority that will ensure they are a sustainable provider. <br><br>To be honest, if government EVER did one thing right, they'd bar ANYONE from providing "phone service" or a service called "dial tone" to the end user in this country unless they followed rules and had oversight by the FCC. Phone service in the US is just FAR too important to allow children to hawk a service to the consumer made to believe that what they are getting is "phone service" which is largely compared to that of the likes of a reliable POTS service.<br><br>my 2-cents]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722334</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:20:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722271</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/887660"><b>hottboiinnc</b></A> : You'll only see HSI prices raise from the Telcos if they change to pure IP for everything. Cable rates will stay the same if not become cheaper.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21722271</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:10:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721928</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/297537"><b>en102</b></A> : I've used Skype, and it works very well.<br>For $36/year, I use it on my cell phone (WiFi) for international calls, and work conference calls, and webcam conferences.<br><br>Its been very robust - even usable over VPN, through a proxy.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721928</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:05:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721733</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/351663"><b>seaquake</b></A> : $15 a month for unlimited local, long distance and other services and I'll be impressed.  That's assuming the quality is there.  I've heard my in-laws Charter VOIP and it sounds like 1960's mission control.  Actually, I'm exaggerating.  Charter didn't sound *that* good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721733</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:30:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721730</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1540952"><b>mod_wastrel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ITALIAN926 <A HREF="/useremail/u/859676"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Majic jack sucks, are you serious? The most unreliable phone service on the entire planet. <br> </div>Works fine for me (which, of course, says nothing about how well it works, or doesn't, for someone else--not everyone has a good enough setup for VoIP even if they're using an ATA). And I certainly didn't get broadband so as to support VoIP, so the cost of broadband doesn't even factor into it (unlike when I had DSL and needed to have that landline, but still had VoIP, too).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721730</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:30:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : I've seen them run one with  a guy that looks like a stereotypical used car sales man on QVC.  They have a count down timer and number sold graphic running.    They run them like mini infomercials that run during a commercial break.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721421</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:25:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721408</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  battleop <A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>     :</small><br><br>Thanks for encouraging the 4 minute commercials they run.  I don't care if it's the best service ever, I will never give them a dime.  <br> </div>I've never seen their commercials. It's rare that I watch any commercials. A coworker had it and really liked it so for $40 I figured I would try it. I looked it up online and checked it out. For only $40 it was worth it(I actually paid less since I had a $25 Best Buy gift card that I used for the purchase so I only paid $15 plus taxes). Especially since it's works exactly the way they said it does. Plus it doesn't affect any of the machines I've used it on. They run as fast as ever.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721408</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:21:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1269402"><b>battleop</b></A> : Thanks for encouraging the 4 minute commercials they run.  I don't care if it's the best service ever, I will never give them a dime.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721401</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:19:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721177</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  tshirt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  aaronwt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I have MagicJAck and pay $20 for the entire year. It sounds just like when I had my landline with FIOS only I'm saving almost $500 a year. Plus no taxes.<br> </div> <br>Well, sort of.<br> with magicJack, you are are paying your BroadBand provider (Verizon, in your case) for the access point.<br> I'm sure all the telco's would be much cheaper in the voice market, if they didn't have the huge overhead of maintaining a local/long distance network (local termanation for non-customer calls are a particularly big drain).<br> As the telco's transition to pure IP voice service, I think you'll see the Broadband price rise to cover the network cost, and voice service drop closer to full service VoIP providers (vonage, etc.)<br> </div>I am paying FIOS anyway for my 50/20 connection. Even when I had my landline I had the 30/5 first  and then the 50/20 INternet. So I'm not paying any extra for that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721177</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:29:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ITALIAN926 <A HREF="/useremail/u/859676"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>Majic jack sucks, are you serious? The most unreliable phone service on the entire planet. <br> </div>Have you used it? I've used it with a Vista 64bit PC, Vista 32 bit PC, and two Window XP machines. It has been flawless. The sound quality has equaled what I had when I had my land line with FIOS. You can't get better than that. It has worked exactly as advertised. I have had zero problems. IF they had the option to port the home phone number, back when I ported it to my cell phone, I would have ported it to MagicJack instead.<br>I have been extremely pleased with it. It has worked EXACTLY like they advertised for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721164</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:25:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721161</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039313"><b>tshirt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  aaronwt <A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I have MagicJAck and pay $20 for the entire year. It sounds just like when I had my landline with FIOS only I'm saving almost $500 a year. Plus no taxes.<br> </div> <br>Well, sort of.<br> with magicJack, you are are paying your BroadBand provider (Verizon, in your case) for the access point.<br> I'm sure all the telco's would be much cheaper in the voice market, if they didn't have the huge overhead of maintaining a local/long distance network (local termanation for non-customer calls are a particularly big drain).<br> As the telco's transition to pure IP voice service, I think you'll see the Broadband price rise to cover the network cost, and voice service drop closer to full service VoIP providers (vonage, etc.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721161</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:24:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721114</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/859676"><b>ITALIAN926</b></A> : Majic jack sucks, are you serious? The most unreliable phone service on the entire planet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721114</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:13:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721077</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1105113"><b>aaronwt</b></A> : I have MagicJAck and pay $20 for the entire year. It sounds just like when I had my landline with FIOS only I'm saving almost $500 a year. Plus no taxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721077</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:07:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why would I pay $45?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/344426"><b>bgraham</b></A> : I have Voicewing for $25 and 3cents/minute to Europe. Why would I pay $45 for the same thing?<br><br>I probably could get another VOIP for $15 or $20 a month if I looked around.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21721005</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:54:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
