site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


kamm

join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

1 edit

reply to KodiacZiller

Re: money money money money..... MONEY!

said by KodiacZiller:

said by DarkLogix:

Ya but would/could a single server have that much capasity?

in windows 64bit the largest logical drive you can have is 7.5TB so 7.5*26(letteres in the alphabet) 195TB
not lets assume not windows
500TB=minimum 334 1.5TB harddrives (but of course add redundancy so) 336 drives if one large array is even possible

It would be easy to see its possible but it would take some planning as to how to orgenize and various other aspects and possibly a need for ZFS

you could actually fit the drives all in one 48U Rack with space to spare

it would be cool to get more details as to how they set it up(although I know how I would)
They won't be using Windows (but knowing cable companies, I wouldn't doubt they'd try).

Like you said, this is a job for a UNIX variant and ZFS (most likely Solaris). ZFS is as scalable as you want it to be.
If you go down the SAN way I doubt this level of number-crunching (analyzing the habits of ~16M subs) can be done without using some sort of shared FS.
--
said by bicker:

Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.

Friday, 01-Jun 06:09:48 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics