| reply to Dogfather
Re: Stupid You last point is the entire issue.
They should not be content providers because they can't / won't do it in a neutral fashion that is beneficial to the consumers. They will do it in a fashion that is beneficial to their bottom line and stock jockies first and foremost. This has been demonstrated over and over and over by them over decades, if not century.
They should be dumbpipes nothing more nothing less and regulated as so. One network Nation wide. If they want to provide content, then they should have separate entities that are treated just as any other entity to gain access to the same customers. No special agreements, no backdoor deals, and no special access. |
|
 DogfatherPremium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA | Even that won't work though. They'll still be up to no good, simply charging "tolls" to content providers like Google or Netflix for 'priority access'. |
|
| That would fall under the "No special agreements, no backdoor deals, and no special access" provision.
Those companies (Google, Netflix) will pay. They are a business that need access to the internet. They will purchased bandwidth adequate for their business needs.but they will do it based on bandwidth need that is in accordance to standard pricing that any and every other company can access and pay. |
|
