site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
920
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Belarc Advisor ·Asking Tech Questions ·Athlon XP True Speeds ·BIOS Beep Codes ·Hardware Tech #s
AuthorAll Replies


Sperkowitz
Premium
join:2002-03-30
Burbank, CA

Name this video card

Click for full size
Click for full size
I found a spare computer in my sister's garage and found out it was better than what my dad uses. It run pretty good, but I would like to not have him use the onboard video. Going through my things, I found an old video card in a box, but besides knowing it's a Nvidia card (it says so on the card), I have no idea what model it is. I know it's nothing fancy, but it has to be better than using on board video. Think anyone can figure out what it is by the pictures I have attached? Or will I need to just install it and have Windows XP tell me? I want to have the drivers downloaded before I install it.

ChiTang
Premium,MVM
join:2002-08-23
Alhambra, CA
kudos:1

From the look, may be Vanta, TNT etc... XP should have native driver for it.
--
I used to be indecisive, now I am not sure.



Sperkowitz
Premium
join:2002-03-30
Burbank, CA

I'll throw it in there and see what it does. Thanks!



renton
Come On You Spurs
Premium
join:2002-01-05
Toronto, ON

reply to Sperkowitz
Looks like it's an MX440.
»www.cpa-inc.net/product_info.php···d=494344



dbmaven
There's no shortage
Premium,Mod
join:1999-10-26
Sty in Sky
kudos:2

reply to Sperkowitz
»www.google.com/search?q=HP+5187-···irefox-a



HRM
God Bless America
Premium,MVM
join:2002-02-03
Darien, CT
kudos:1

reply to Sperkowitz
Onboard video is probably better.



Sperkowitz
Premium
join:2002-03-30
Burbank, CA

reply to renton

said by renton:

Looks like it's an MX440.
»www.cpa-inc.net/product_info.php···d=494344
The default XP driver says it is a MX440.


Sperkowitz
Premium
join:2002-03-30
Burbank, CA

1 edit

reply to HRM
The motherboard model is a VIA chipset M266 running a 2.0 GHz Celron. (»www.shopping.com/xPF-Asrock-ASRo···idge-VIA) Do you think the onboard is better than what is on this board? It currently only has 190 MB of ram, if I used onboard then 32MB will be dedicated to video. And the computer has XP Pro installed.

The computer will not be used for any gaming. And I'm sure my dad would have survived with the on board video. But I wanted to maximize the RAM it has.



neonhomer
KK4BFN
Premium
join:2004-01-27
Edgewater, FL

IMHO - Any video card is better than a onboard video. The onboard video uses system ram, and uses system CPU processes. An add-on video card has its own memory, and uses less CPU power.



LazMan
Premium
join:2003-03-26
canada

reply to Sperkowitz
HP Part # makes this an MX440 w/ 64 Meg of ram and NTSC Video Out.

It's not much of a card by today's standards, but with limited RAM in the PC, and just using it for surfing/email/office stuff (assuming, from the "no gaming" comment) - I'd use the card.

Laz



Sperkowitz
Premium
join:2002-03-30
Burbank, CA

reply to Sperkowitz
Thanks everyone for the help and the suggestions. I'm sticking with the video card. Just got it updated to SP3 and it runs well. My dad should be very happy with this. He'll actually be able to use Youtube video smoothly now.


Friday, 01-Jun 06:20:30 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics