 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to jmn1207
Re: ...And said by jmn1207:Since the transition will have no direct impact on their FiOS TV service, it might be beneficial to have a flood of people looking for TV service as a result. The transition might potentially create more customers for their TV service, which needs no development time before deployment, as it already exists. You do relzie that the VAST majority of people that use OTA are in rural areas not service by cable and will never be service by FiOS either. Anyone that lives in an area serviced by FiOS also has cable, and satelite available to them. |
|
 jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Ashburn, VA | I do realize that a greater percentage of people in rural areas most likely use OTA for their TV. But there are simply way more people living in heavily populated areas that use OTA. There are typically many more channels, and the population is obviously much greater.
Keeping the transition date help Verizon in more ways than just allowing them to go forward with their LTE testing. |
|
|
|
BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by jmn1207:I do realize that a greater percentage of people in rural areas most likely use OTA for their TV. But there are simply way more people living in heavily populated areas that use OTA. There are typically many more channels, and the population is obviously much greater. Keeping the transition date help Verizon in more ways than just allowing them to go forward with their LTE testing. You're dreaming. Their wish for the shut off date to go on as scheduled as nothing to do with getting more FiOS custoemrs. If it is they are stupid. the amount of potential customers gained would be miniscule. Keep wearing that tin foil hat. |
|
