bilbobbr
join:2005-11-07
Isle of Man | reply to lodestar
Re: WLI-TX4-AG300N
That is a very good point. Isn't the actual throughput you get from wireless connected at 130Mbps a lot less than you would get from a wired 100Mbps though? |
|
lodestar
join:2005-08-23
England
1 edit | Yes I would have thought so, and Buffalo seem to be recognising that by only supplying 10/100 lan ports. I was intending to buy the WLI-TX4-AG300N for use with my Buffalo WZR-AG300NH router which does have gigabit lan ports. So it might well be able to exceed 10/100 lan port speeds but would not be able to demonstrate that in partnership with the WLI-TX4-AG300N. |
|
tipstir
join:2004-11-14
Enfield, CT
 ·Cox HSI
| The Gig LAN will only work at LAN speeds of the slower network device on your LAN. So if you have 100mbps and 1000mpbs then they'll fallback to that. I have that problem so I just place the 1000mbps on completely different setup. Since there is no 1000mbps for WAN yet even though routers have that feature. I only use my 1000mbps with Jumbo Frames on to transfer larger GIG files among themselves using the \\ipgig address. These desktops and servers have dual NICs. One is for the Megabyte WAN/LAN the other one is for GigLAN. |
|
