videoOip
@anonymouse.org | reply to RARPSL
Re: I can see both sides here...
Do all the same principals go for the Video over IP priority which is done by FiOS?
If I have my Internet Video app, FiOS must give it equal treatment as their HD ESPN signal? |
|
trentboyea
join:2009-01-20
New York, NY
| said by videoOip :
Do all the same principals go for the Video over IP priority which is done by FiOS?
If I have my Internet Video app, FiOS must give it equal treatment as their HD ESPN signal?
Good point. According to another DSLR story here at »No, AT&T Is Not Throttling U-Verse, AT&T U-Verse does similar stuff. I am guessing Verizon FIOS is the same.
quote:
In order to provide a consistently high-quality video service, AT&T Uverse High Speed Internet throughput speeds may be temporarily reduced when a customer is using other U-verse services in a manner that requires high bandwidth. This could occur more often with higher speed Internet access products. It may be necessary, for some AT&T High Speed Internet users, for AT&T to set a maximum downstream speed on a customer line to enhance the reliability and consistency of performance.
|
|
jmn1207
Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to videoOip
said by videoOip :
Do all the same principals go for the Video over IP priority which is done by FiOS?
If I have my Internet Video app, FiOS must give it equal treatment as their HD ESPN signal?
I think that only FiOS video on demand uses IP, not a live, "real time" channel like ESPN. Not sure what kind of preferential treatment is given to FiOS VoD content, but it may have to be investigated if it presents an anti-competitive advantage. |
|
