3, 2, 1 .....

Author	All Replies
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	3, 2, 1 ..... And here come the Anti-Muni trolls! Regardless, good luck with this project and I sincerely hope for its success!
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 09:36:17 ·
JasonOD @comcast.net	Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business?
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 09:42:29 ·
ISurfTooMuch join:2007-04-23 Tuscaloosa, AL	Then should a town not launch a public transit system because it might take business from taxicabs?
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 09:52:08 ·
dcurrey Premium join:2004-06-29 Reviews: ·RoadRunner Cable ·ViaTalk	reply to Matt One thing I know for sure is about 10 years ago our city tried to run its own cable company. More or less FTTN type deal don't know why they just didn't do FTTH. But no matter cost the city Millions to build and maintain. Had to sell it at a major loss to Cinci Bell. It about bankrupted the city. Only good that came from it was it lowered Time Warners rates to match the cities. Since it was sold off to Cincinnati Bell they have been forced to be competitive. The prices they are charging are roughly what we pay. Internet speeds are a hell off a lot faster with them however. -- Any unauthorized use of your own judgment is strictly prohibited.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 09:56:14 ·
Dogfather Premium join:2007-12-26 Laguna Hills, CA	reply to JasonOD Absolutely, especially when they're nothing but sue happy roadblocks to progress.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:04:28 ·
jimbo2150 join:2004-05-10 Youngstown, OH	reply to JasonOD What I think these need to be doing is facilitating competition without bringing physical competition. The governmenet/private funded fiber should be build but no access provided directly by any government agency. Instead they should allow any company who wishes to pay a fee/per X customers for maintenance & bandwidth but allow any company who wants to do so. That will provide the customers a choice of any X provider they wish to go with and without one or two large companies dominating a region with their own infrastructure and preventing other companies from competing in a given region. Why cant they do that? -- - "Techie" Jim
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:08:26 ·
Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 1 edit	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? If the local company isn't providing an adequate service and refuses to, absolutely.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:10:50 ·

Matt All noise, no signal. Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12	reply to jimbo2150 said by jimbo2150: What I think these need to be doing is facilitating competition without bringing physical competition. The governmenet/private funded fiber should be build but no access provided directly by any government agency. Instead they should allow any company who wishes to pay a fee/per X customers for maintenance & bandwidth but allow any company who wants to do so. That will provide the customers a choice of any X provider they wish to go with and without one or two large companies dominating a region with their own infrastructure and preventing other companies from competing in a given region. Why cant they do that? You just described UTOPIA. The problem with this model, is the Comcasts, AT&Ts, and Time Warners of the world don't have exclusive access to your eyes, ears, and wallet, so they don't like this idea.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:12:49 ·
ISurfTooMuch join:2007-04-23 Tuscaloosa, AL	reply to jimbo2150 One way to do this would be to build a network and connect every residence and business at no charge. That connection would get you access to local government Web sites (offering extensive e-services), video access to local public access channels, and telephone access to 911 and local government offices. That's it. For a small fee, you could get access to anything on the local fiber network, and, if you wanted TV, Internet, and phone service, you could contract with any provider who has connected to the network.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:18:35 ·
whosmatt join:2005-02-28 San Diego, CA	reply to JasonOD Why would this put a local company out of business?
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:20:18 ·
dcplaya @ge.com	reply to dcurrey Where do you live in Cincinnati? I have never heard anything like that being tried around the Cincinnati area? Also, if they sold a TV infrastructure to CB then why does CB offer DirectTV?
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:40:44 ·
nasadude join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD Reviews: ·Verizon FiOS	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? comcast, ATT and time-warner are local companies? Just poor, struggling, small footprint local companies?
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 10:56:52 ·
NetAdmin1 CCNA join:2008-05-22	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? Okay, I'll bite. First, from the article: The user notes that the local cable competitor is Bresnan Communications. Doing a bit of digging on Bresnan's site yields: Today, Bresnan Communications operates in Colorado, Montana, Wyoming and Utah. and Corporate Headquarters Bresnan Communications One Manhattanville Road Purchase, NY 10577-2596 914.641.3300 Bresnan isn't a local company, they are headquartered in New York,. The community is better off running its own network to keep the money local. -- "This is a bus. You know how big a bus is?"
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 11:18:17 ·
wifi4milez Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace join:2004-08-07 New York, NY	reply to Matt said by Matt: said by jimbo2150: What I think these need to be doing is facilitating competition without bringing physical competition. The governmenet/private funded fiber should be build but no access provided directly by any government agency. Instead they should allow any company who wishes to pay a fee/per X customers for maintenance & bandwidth but allow any company who wants to do so. That will provide the customers a choice of any X provider they wish to go with and without one or two large companies dominating a region with their own infrastructure and preventing other companies from competing in a given region. Why cant they do that? You just described UTOPIA. The problem with this model, is the Comcasts, AT&Ts, and Time Warners of the world don't have exclusive access to your eyes, ears, and wallet, so they don't like this idea. The other problem is that Utopia was a money pit, and thats why it failed. Since it was basically managed by a municipality that had no idea what they were doing, they blew through the allocated money with no real planning. A private company on the other hand, is typically more inclined to watch their bottom line since (without these outrageous bailouts!) going out of business is the end of the line. -- Комитет государственной безопасности
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 11:24:04 ·
JazzJRabbit join:2003-09-27 Naperville, IL Reviews: ·WOW Internet and..	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? If municipality can provide better service for lesser price without using any taxpayer money it means that it's more efficient than local companies. So hell yes it should.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 11:30:07 ·
Transmaster Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? Local Company!? Bresnan Communications is a owned lock stock and barrel by Comcast. So it is rather the reverse it is the local David taking on Goliath. -- I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's. - Mark Twain in Eruption
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 11:48:05 ·
fifty nine join:2002-09-25 Sussex, NJ kudos:1	reply to Matt said by Matt: And here come the Anti-Muni trolls! Regardless, good luck with this project and I sincerely hope for its success! I have no problem with well run municipal utilities. But judging by the waste of taxpayer dollars in my town, plus the bad experiences I've had dealing with NYC DoITT, I think that communications infrastructure should be left up to the private sector.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 11:51:28 ·
dcurrey Premium join:2004-06-29 Reviews: ·RoadRunner Cable ·ViaTalk 2 edits	reply to dcplaya Lebanon Ohio. Just north of you. Reason they don't do it in Cinci is the lines are laid in Lebanon and I think parts of Turtlecreek township. See »www.cincinnatibell.com/consumer/tv/cable/ Should also note that Cinci bell always handled the phone side of the service for the city. TW phone service price was much better at the time. Looks like they have pretty much matched it now. -- Any unauthorized use of your own judgment is strictly prohibited.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 12:28:41 ·
Rally Bah Humbug Premium join:2000-10-27 Astoria, NY	reply to Matt Congrats to them I hope this booms into more muni's state-wide.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 13:37:47 ·
cdru Go Colts Premium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:5 Reviews: ·Frontier FiOS	reply to JasonOD said by JasonOD : Ok Matt, I'll bite. Is it really a good ting to have municipalities put local companies out of business? Do many municipalities of 5500 have local broadband providers that would be put out of business? Yeah, I didn't think so either.
	to forum · permalink · 2009-01-21 14:29:17 ·

Powell, Wyoming: Population 5,500, Gets Fiber > 3, 2, 1 .....