Thanks for giving the people of the internet a great idea...
If nobody WAS going to "remix" it, sounds like they just gave several people the idea to
I find this part of the Wired article to be very interesting:
"The public interest will not be served by broadcasting a single snippet of these proceedings, because doing so places a misleading emphasis on a limited aspect of the judicial process."
A limited aspect? Sure, a "hearing" may not mean the "full trial" but if a hearing and the ensuing trial are a "limited aspect" of our judicial process, what are some of the less limited ones?
Is that admitting to buying people off, extorting everyone they can, not paying artists fairly, and being jerks in general?
Did they really just allude to such things?