| reply to funchords
Re: Is is true that 92% of us can order Cable Internet? I would guess those stats are culled from FCC data, which is about as reliable as the Dallas Cowboys come playoff time. |
|
 jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA
1 edit | There is always the NCTA database; however, trying to find an accurate number of total households in the US is challenging.
»www.ncta.com/Statistic/Statistic···ics.aspx
Edit: Ok, this source states that there are 128.2 million households.
»www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/us/07housing.html
The NCTA claims that 117.7 million homes are passed by cable internet. So, that is about 92%. |
|
|
|
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
| You'd need to get out into the field to confirm anything. Some new digital technologies don't work at longer distances where previous homes passed worked fine, etc.
Before we spend billions or do anything -- we need to seriously map who has service -- and who does not. |
|
jmn1207Premium
join:2000-07-19
Reston, VA | said by Karl Bode:Before we spend billions or do anything -- we need to seriously map who has service -- and who does not. That would take a considerable amount of coordination and assistance from the cable/telco industries. The information coming from them would have to be audited to help ensure accuracy. And the end result of all their hard work would most certainly have a negative impact on their business and possibly get them into trouble after "exposing" their footprint, at least with regards to public opinion.
Any semi-legitimate map would have to survive the usual gauntlet of lobbyists lining the paths of our politicians' careers.
Here's to hope. |
|
 espaethDigital PlumberPremium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
kudos:2
 ·Clear Wireless
| reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:Before we spend billions or do anything -- we need to seriously map who has service -- and who does not. We have a Decennial Census coming up here shortly -- couldn't we just add a couple questions to that and kill 2 birds with one stone?
Sure, it's not going to be all that accurate, but it's not like any other sampling method is going to gain much ground on the accuracy front. |
|
| We have a Decennial Census coming up here shortly -- couldn't we just add a couple questions to that and kill 2 birds with one stone? I think that certainly should be part of the equation. |
|
| reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:I would guess those stats are culled from FCC data, which is about as reliable as the Dallas Cowboys come playoff time. You know why Romo is so happy Prez Bush is back in Texas? He's no longer the biggest disappointment in the state...
--
"Hard work often pays off after time, but laziness always pays off now." |
|
Reviews:
 ·Comcast
 ·Comcast Digital ..
| reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode:I would guess those stats are culled from FCC data, which is about as reliable as the Dallas Cowboys come playoff time. Ouch!
--
Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil. |
|
 KoolMoeAw ManPremium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD | reply to Karl Bode
I do projects for the Census Bureau on occasion. They're the standard government bureaucracy. No way they'd get that question in by the Decennial.
However, the Census Bureau has several survey programs - the full person Decennial count is just the Big One. With the right inside ear, it's feasible that could be added to something like the ACS Survey.
I'll have to remember to ask about that 
KM |
|
| If I remember correctly, the most recent mapping bill by Congress does put some mapping authority into both the hands of the GTO and the Census Bureau already.... |
|
| reply to quarkmachine
Hey quark, I couldn't agree more. BTW, that intel-like avatar is awesome. good stuff. |
|
