site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
177
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


cornelius785_nli

@verizon.net

rural wiring?

as long as best wired portions of the country for fiber isn't the middle of f'ing nowhere (aka extreme rural) i won't have any problems with the bill. i'll real pissed to find out that lots of rural locations(4000) are being place well before more densely (15,000+) populated areas.

fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

You take care of RURAL first with out services.. THEN you move to areas that already have access to the internet. Take the word FIBER out of your complaint there. The idea is to get people connected, not really upgraded first. Those that have internet already need to have it first.. and since it doesn't have it, doing fiber right away is only smart.

I do think it's hilarious that you're now trying to compare 4,000 to 15,000.. and how 15,000 people are more deserving that others.. that's just WAY too funny. That's a "me! me! me first!!" .. I thought that went away in grade school. It would be a little different if we were talking about a city center of about 80,000 people vs 4,000 people.. then I'd support your argument.


Friday, 01-Jun 06:33:25 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics