 MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to djrobx
Re: I still don't understand why they want to charge you--- said by djrobx:I'd rather have Verizon's option. I don't need more minutes. I need my phone to work reliably at home, and I don't want a higher fee for the privilege. And I have full signal at home, but would love to pay an extra $15-$20 bucks a month not to have to use my cell minutes at home. 6 of one, half-a-dozen of another. ::shrug:: |
|
 djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:1
 ·Verizon Wireless..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·VOIPo
·PHONE POWER
| said by Matt:And I have full signal at home, but would love to pay an extra $15-$20 bucks a month not to have to use my cell minutes at home. 6 of one, half-a-dozen of another. ::shrug:: Why do they need to be mutually exclusive options? Offer the hardware, and then offer an "at home unlimited" feature for an additional, optional cost?
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.
|
|
 RockyBBPremium
join:2005-01-31
Steamboat Springs, CO | said by djrobx: Offer the hardware, and then offer an "at home unlimited" feature for an additional, optional cost? That is exactly Sprint's offer. |
|
|
|
MattAll noise, no signal.Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12 | reply to djrobx
said by djrobx:said by Matt:And I have full signal at home, but would love to pay an extra $15-$20 bucks a month not to have to use my cell minutes at home. 6 of one, half-a-dozen of another. ::shrug:: Why do they need to be mutually exclusive options? Offer the hardware, and then offer an "at home unlimited" feature for an additional, optional cost? So you want them to offer the hardware and the service for free? |
|
 wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | reply to RockyBB
said by RockyBB:said by djrobx: Offer the hardware, and then offer an "at home unlimited" feature for an additional, optional cost? That is exactly Sprint's offer. No, Sprint requires you have a plan specifically tied to the device. Verizon appears to be just the opposite (no plan required). Hopefully, ATT will realize people might want either, and actually offer both options.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности
|
|
RockyBBPremium
join:2005-01-31
Steamboat Springs, CO | said by wifi4milez:No, Sprint requires you have a plan specifically tied to the device. They don't require me to have a plan to the device. I have a plan with a fee for that plan, and then a monthly fee to use the device .... minutes used on the device don't count against the allowance on the plan. |
|
wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | said by RockyBB:said by wifi4milez:No, Sprint requires you have a plan specifically tied to the device. They don't require me to have a plan to the device. I have a plan with a fee for that plan, and then a monthly fee to use the device .... minutes used on the device don't count against the allowance on the plan. We are saying the same thing, just using different words. Sprint makes you pay a fee (call it a plan, charge, etc.) each month to have the device. The do not offer the option to simply buy the unit, then use your standard wireless minutes. It looks like just Verizon is doing this, although if we look further they too might be charging some sort of fee (charge, etc.) each month to have the device as well.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности
|
|
xirianPremium
join:2003-01-26
Beacon, NY
kudos:1 | I swear I've read people saying that they whined hard enough and didn't have to pay the fee for the device monthly. |
|
wifi4milezBig Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY | said by xirian:I swear I've read people saying that they whined hard enough and didn't have to pay the fee for the device monthly. You are correct. Apparently if you complain enough they will give you the device for free and not charge you a monthly fee. However, for the sake of argument I am just pointing out their standard offering involves paying a fee each month to have it.
--
Комитет государственной безопасности
|
|
 JoeG4
join:2001-12-16
945941 | reply to Matt
said by Matt:said by djrobx:said by Matt:And I have full signal at home, but would love to pay an extra $15-$20 bucks a month not to have to use my cell minutes at home. 6 of one, half-a-dozen of another. ::shrug:: Why do they need to be mutually exclusive options? Offer the hardware, and then offer an "at home unlimited" feature for an additional, optional cost? So you want them to offer the hardware and the service for free? ABSOLUTELY! |
|
