 DarkLogixPremium
join:2008-10-23
Baytown, TX
kudos:3 | reply to ninjatutle
Re: Whats the problem? All someone would have to do is wrongfully send you 3 DMCA takedown notices and your offline
and that someone could just not like you, be randomly sending fake notices, or be a mentaly incompetent RIAA lawyer
and bam your offline and they'll never hear your side unless you pay crazy amounts to a lawyer and hope to win |
|
jagged
join:2003-07-01
Boynton Beach, FL | Genius ... I am guessing you have never written DMCA notices
in that case do educate yourself on what DMCA notice rules are
and bear in mind sending off a fake DMCA notice is the same as lieing under oath.
Whoever signs the DMCA does so "under penalty of perjury" like so:
I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in the notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed. |
|
 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5 | That doesn't make them accurate, that just prevents them (if possible) from being totally fabricated by the person signing.
Take a look: »bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/0···notices/
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL
... Should we pay those who are "too big to fail" more money to ensure they stay that way? ... |
|
