Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T And Verizon FTTH On The Same Block? » It would come down to the bottom line for me...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
I'd take Verizon hands down over AT&T... »
« I dont necessarily agree  
AuthorAll Replies


aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
·Verizon FIOS

reply to en102
Re: It would come down to the bottom line for me...

That is too slow. I had 5mbs/1mbs back in 1997. This is 2009.

said by en102 See Profile :

Bottom line for me...

- What's it going to cost me
- What do I get for it
- Is it reliable

I don't need 50Mbps (unless its being sold to me for ~$30-40 /month as part of a decent priced bundle).

Here's what I would want/need:
~$100/month price
-TV service on 3 sets (SD currently)
-VoIP unlimited including Canada
-Internet at +6Mbps/1Mbps

Currently I have this package on TWC (10/1Mbps) - I do not wish to pay more.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME

For many... 1.5Mbps/384kbps is even fine.

I do remote work (over SSH/VPN) and have used 3Mbps/512kbps up until recently (POTS got too expensive - TWC made a good deal)

Consider the following:

1.5Mbps/384bkps - $25
6Mbps/512kbps - $40
10Mbps/1Mbps - $55
20Mbps/2Mbps (or 18/1.5Mbps on AT&T) $65

Which would you pick and why ?
I personally would pick the 6Mbps/512kbps - if I didn't have to work remotely - I'd probably hit the 1.5Mbps/384kbps.

Now... lets add some modern economics to this:
5GB cap 1.5Mbps/384bkps - $25
40GB cap 6Mbps/512kbps - $40
150GB cap 10Mbps/1Mbps - $55
300GB cap 20Mbps/2Mbps (or 18/1.5Mbps on AT&T) $65

I'd be in the 10Mbps/1Mbps... just by volume of data.

This is the 'new incentive' for higher speed/pricing.
Not everyone needs (or better yet wants) to pay for higher speed.

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to aaronwt
said by aaronwt See Profile :

That is too slow. I had 5mbs/1mbs back in 1997. This is 2009.
Makes no difference to me. Internet for $25 to $30 per month, regardless of the speed. If you can't deliver 100 mb/s for $30 a month, I can live without it.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
-
Forums » AT&T And Verizon FTTH On The Same Block?I'd take Verizon hands down over AT&T... »
« I dont necessarily agree  


Tuesday, 01-Dec 06:19:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [60] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [48] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [36] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [31] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [25] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [22] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [4] Monday Evening Links
· [3] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· MagicJack Error Broken Storage [MagicJack]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· What is the best subcription ratio? [Wireless Service Providers]