site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
6806
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·ALL ·Review Your VoIP Provider ·VoIP Providers ·VoIP FAQ ·Porting Rules ·What Codec?
page: 1 · 2
AuthorAll Replies


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

reply to Fox McCloud

Re: [Other] Gizmo5 PAP2T-NA

I'll just stick with GC+Gizmo :P

now, if only there was a phone-plan out there that offered unlimited data-access for $5-10 a month....install some SIP software, configure it with Gizmo, and use your GC number for people to call ya...you'd have a really cheap mobile plan.

*shrug* that's probably the future...VoIP+data-based texting for mobile phones....it'd be really cheap, that's for sure.

mazilo
From Mazilo
Premium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA
kudos:1

reply to N9MD

said by N9MD:

said by PX Eliezer:

N9MD, you surprise me. I thought that as a gastroenterologist you knew about going through the backdoor.
Thanks, PX ... I had not used the G5 "colorectal dialing" feature ...
I thought the problem was due to your coke's formula that doesn't include viagra and cialis.
--
Mazilo always prays for FREEBIES!
US Phone: +1-678-601-0907
UK Phone: +44-703-194-2574

mazilo
From Mazilo
Premium
join:2002-05-30
Lilburn, GA
kudos:1

reply to PX Eliezer

said by PX Eliezer:

The Gizmo5 site does indeed say:

"Additionally, once you call a number using the Backdoor Dialing program, the person you called can call you back directly on your computer, by simply dialing the Caller ID number they see when you called them. Their call will only cost the price of a local phone call and they'll be able to call you anytime you're logged into Gizmo5, on any computer, anywhere in the world!"

This may be new---I don't think that paragraph was there a while ago.
IIRC, when Gizmo5 VoIP Backdoor dialing just came out, I already saw the above paragraph you quoted from Gizmo5. The idea is so that the called party can reach you back through a CID left on their phone if the recipient wasn't there to answer the phone when you call.
--
Mazilo always prays for FREEBIES!
US Phone: +1-678-601-0907
UK Phone: +44-703-194-2574


Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

4 edits

reply to N9MD
Ok, it's working...seems to work pretty good in conjunction with the dialer I have.

Just one issue (and one question).

When my phone rings, it's quite...erratic, it doesn't ring like it normally does, it's like it rings ok, then chokes out and is really choppy. Any ideas/Solutions?

Another problem is that I have 2 phones...a base unit and a satellite. When I receive a call the satellite rings, but the base unit does not..if I yank the battery out of the satellite, then the base unit functions as it should.....these are problems that have never existed before.

The third problem is that when I receive a call and answer it, depending on the phone that answer, it'll say "received call" on the phone I do not answer...I thought CID was supposed to be synchronized across the system?

The question I had is, will this service ever display names on my caller ID or just the phone number?


PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:12
Reviews:
·voip.ms
·callwithus
·Callcentric
·Vitelity VOIP
·Optimum Voice
·Gizmo5

Regarding your first two problems----

Log into the PAP2T control panel (webpage).

Select ADVANCED VIEW, then go to Regional.

Then go to section: "Ring and Call Waiting Tone Spec"

Write down the settings, in case you need to go back.

Try (if not already this way):

Waveform: Trapezoid
Voltage: 70
Ring Frequency: 20

And also try THIS way:

Waveform: Sinusoid
Voltage: 80
Ring Frequency: 25



Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

1 edit

Ok, I read somewhere else that changing it form trapezoid to sinusoid may work...I tried that (left the voltage at 85 and the frequency a 20Hz) and it did the trick.

One question though, what's "synchronized ring" and "FXS Port Power Limit"?

I heard that you set the FXS port power limit to the amount of phones you're using that are plugged into a single port...I have 1, but am using two phones (one wirelessly connects to the base unit though)...so I take it I'd set this to 1?

What about the synchronized ring?

lastly, is it normal for the Internet light to periodically flash when I'm not talking and there is no incoming calls?


PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:12

1 edit

Synchronized ring is as the name implies. So try it.

As for your other question---FXS port power limit---

»Re: SPA-1001 not ringing Cordless phone some times?



DogFace05

join:2005-12-09
Cary, NC
kudos:149

reply to Fox McCloud
Linksys out of some snafu set the wrong default ring voltage and frequency for North America. The correct settings are 90V and 20Hz (sinusoid). Some phones will work regardless, but others can be finicky. Some people will occasionally suggest setting it to trapezoidal, which is totally wrong for North American phones. A trapezoidal ring will contain more overtones, which sometimes tricks phones into ringing, but it's a very clumsy way to deal with an issue that's simply due to a wrong frequency/voltage setting.



Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

Thanks, DogFace05!

A few more questions for you;

what do you recommend setting the FXS port power to? Again, I have 1 base unit plugged directly into the adapter (it's also plugged into a power outlet, of course), and I have a satellite plugged into another power outlet...no phone line plugged into it.

Also, should I have the synchronized ring set to on or off?



DogFace05

join:2005-12-09
Cary, NC
kudos:149

1 edit

Just leave it at the default, which should be fine. This value is the REN (or Ringer Equivalence Number). Your phone or base unit should have a REN value stamped on it. The value corresponds to the relative power consumption of its ringer compared to an old standard bell phone (which would have a theoretical REN of 1), and is a measure of how many such phones can be rung simultaneoulsy by the unit. Most modern PSTN powered phones use far more efficient piezo-electric buzzers, and will have a REN of 0.1-0.3. For phone equipment powered from the mains, such as any cordless phone base, the REN is negligible, so you don't have to worry about this setting. Cordless handsets don't consume any power from the phone line, and thus have no relevance.

As for synchronized ring, unless you have a specialized need for it, it's a don't care setting.



Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

Thanks again.

Though, let me ask you this, would setting the FXS to "1" possibly save me, in theory, a penny or two a month? I just checked my phone and its REN value is 0.1, so I know 1 would work fine...but if it's not going to change power consumption of the unit itself...well, why bother?



DogFace05

join:2005-12-09
Cary, NC
kudos:149

No, all it does is control a current limitter, so no matter what the load on the line, the current output will never exceed the setting. It's basically there as a safeguard against overload. The setting really has little use and appears to be there only because the SLIC chip supports it. IIRC, newer ATAs like the SPA2102 have done away with it.



Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

ahh, ok, gotcha.

Thansk, again, for all the help!


Thursday, 31-May 07:53:26 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics