site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
599
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Kloneicle

@omcastbusiness.net

...

10$... lmao... anyone can put a price on happiness right? Id expect a months free service. The guy played the happy dance on tv...

quatrix
Premium
join:2005-02-11
Davie, FL
kudos:2

Free service for what? You know people normally pay Comcast for porn, right?


jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to Kloneicle
Well, I'm just amazed some trial lawyers didn't get on board and run commercials. Were you underage children watching the Super Bowl? Were they exposed to Pornographic Material that forced you to explain to them what happened? If so, Contact so and so for a class action lawsuit... As legally, I am sure people could sue. Porn is illegal for anyone under 18 and the fact that one could claim their child saw the images would be violating the law.

So 10 dollars? Seems Comcast is trying to hope people take the deal and "settle" versus sue. Not that I think ANYONE SHOULD SUE HERE. It was a mistake, but it just seems like they are trying to mitigate their liability. Accept this and our hands our freed from you.



mrchris
Out and around
Premium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY

Golly gee, what a prude country we've become... -_-


jc100

join:2002-04-10

More like litigious and willing to sue over anything.... Odds are little Timmy has already browsed porn on his P.C. and not as innocent as his parents think. Not that pumping 10 seconds of porn to possible children viewers is right. However, mistakes do happen. Being most probably don't use OTA analog, I am sure those that saw it were minimized by this fact. Still, I am extremely surprised ambulance chasers have not gotten on the suing bandwagon. Maybe it's just too early, as they have to write up the paperwork first.



ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

reply to jc100
Comcast needs to be fined at a minimum of $25 million USD. This is an outrage!


lesopp

join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL

reply to Kloneicle
I think every Comcast subscriber should review their next bill closely to ensure there isn't a "bonus" video charge.


st7860

join:2004-05-13
San Francisco, CA

reply to Kloneicle
comcastsuperbowlporn.com not safe for work lol


jc100

join:2002-04-10

reply to ninjatutle
I don't agree. Listen, mistakes happen. I don't think they INTENTIONALLY did anything wrong. I don't like Comcast either, as they are shady. Still, you can't go pitch fork and mob over something that was an accident.



J E F F
Whatta Ya Think About Dat?
Premium
join:2004-04-01
Kitchener, ON
Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
·Rogers Portable ..
·magicjack.com

reply to ninjatutle

said by ninjatutle:

Comcast needs to be fined at a minimum of $25 million USD. This is an outrage!


Why $25 million **USD**?? Make it count and charge them £25 million!! Sure, the pound is done a bit, but it is still more then the USD.
--
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943


ninjatutle
Premium

join:2006-01-02
San Ramon, CA

€25 million Euros would be even better


Monday, 13-Feb 00:44:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics