<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: ...&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21853375</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:02 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:02 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21863607</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : &#128;25 million Euros would be even better  :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21863607</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:10:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21863576</link>
<description><![CDATA[J E F F posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1308792" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1308792');">ninjatutle</a>:</small><br><br>Comcast needs to be fined at a minimum of $25 million USD. This is an outrage!<br> </div> <br><br>Why $25 million **USD**??  Make it count and charge them &pound;25 million!! Sure, the pound is done a bit, but it is still  more then the USD.<br><small>--<br><b> "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."<br></b><i> Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943 </i></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21863576</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 19:05:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21857559</link>
<description><![CDATA[jc100 posted : I don't agree. Listen, mistakes happen.  I don't think they INTENTIONALLY did anything wrong. I don't like Comcast either, as they are shady. Still, you can't go pitch fork and mob over something that was an accident.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21857559</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 20:22:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21856384</link>
<description><![CDATA[st7860 posted : comcastsuperbowlporn.com not safe for work lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21856384</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:02:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21855988</link>
<description><![CDATA[lesopp posted : I think every Comcast subscriber should review their next bill closely to ensure there isn't a "bonus" video charge.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21855988</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:58:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21855164</link>
<description><![CDATA[ninjatutle posted : Comcast needs to be fined at a minimum of $25 million USD. This is an outrage!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21855164</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:47:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854952</link>
<description><![CDATA[jc100 posted : More like litigious and willing to sue over anything....  Odds are little Timmy has already browsed porn on his P.C. and not as innocent as his parents think.  Not that pumping 10 seconds of porn to possible children viewers is right.  However, mistakes do happen.  Being most probably don't use OTA analog, I am sure those that saw it were minimized by this fact.  Still,  I am extremely surprised ambulance chasers have not gotten on the suing bandwagon. Maybe it's just too early, as they have to write up the paperwork first.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854952</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:10:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854542</link>
<description><![CDATA[mrchris posted : Golly gee, what a prude country we've become... -_-]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854542</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:59:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854097</link>
<description><![CDATA[jc100 posted : Well, I'm just amazed some trial lawyers didn't get on board and run commercials. Were you underage children watching the Super Bowl? Were they exposed to Pornographic Material that forced you to explain to them what happened? If so, Contact so and so for a class action lawsuit... As legally, I am sure people could sue.  Porn is illegal for anyone under 18 and the fact that one could claim their child saw the images would be violating the law.  <br><br>So 10 dollars? Seems Comcast is trying to hope people take the deal and "settle" versus sue. Not that I think ANYONE SHOULD SUE HERE. It was a mistake, but it just seems like they are trying to mitigate their liability. Accept this and our hands our freed from you.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854097</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:45:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: ...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854014</link>
<description><![CDATA[quatrix posted : Free service for what?  You know people normally pay Comcast for porn, right?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-21854014</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:27:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>...</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/-21853375</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : 10$... lmao... anyone can put a price on happiness right?  Id expect a months free service.  The guy played the happy dance on tv...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/-21853375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:10:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

