dslreports logo
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc
Search similar:


uniqs
507
hottboiinnc4
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

hottboiinnc4

Member

This is the company that needs the lawsuit.

How can you lock your customers into a contract and then cap their services and then charge the damn ETF if they break it.

TWC will be next in court which they need to be for this shit.

Ohio will probably be next. The're basically the only provider in Ohio as far as expanded services. DSL spotty in cities or not offered. TWC bought almost every cable company here except for the smaller regional and Cox in Cleveland.

swamoman
@ameritech.net

swamoman

Anon

said by hottboiinnc4:

Ohio will probably be next. The're basically the only provider in Ohio as far as expanded services. DSL spotty in cities or not offered. TWC bought almost every cable company here except for the smaller regional and Cox in Cleveland.
i live n ohio, and the idea of TWC capping services here is disturbing. in the area i live(southwest ohio), AT&T DSL is available (which we currently have). if AT&T does it too, we're screwed...
hottboiinnc4
ME
join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

hottboiinnc4

Member

ATT's cap is higher. I'm glad that i moved from TWC land a year ago. I have a local provider who doesn't care what we use our Internet for and will keep it uncapped especially with ATT here.