site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


cameronsfx

join:2009-01-08
Panama City, FL

reply to ElJay

Re: So will TWC stop their false advertising about DSL speed?

said by ElJay:

$1 per GB is absurd. I could see a tenth of that perhaps. Why aren't all of the content distribution providers up in arms about this? This sort of pricing could kill distribution models like those of Valve Software, Amazon Video on Demand, Netflix Instant Streaming, iTunes, etc.
I gig is only $.03 or $.05 each. Ripoff is what I call it. Now, 250 gig cap is okay. I do maybe 40 gigs a month if actively downloaded stuff. Otherwise I've seen 20 gig usage. Maybe rollover gigs? Or, I don't use 10 gigs so I want $1 a gig back.


BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by cameronsfx:

said by ElJay:

$1 per GB is absurd. I could see a tenth of that perhaps. Why aren't all of the content distribution providers up in arms about this? This sort of pricing could kill distribution models like those of Valve Software, Amazon Video on Demand, Netflix Instant Streaming, iTunes, etc.
I gig is only $.03 or $.05 each. Ripoff is what I call it. Now, 250 gig cap is okay. I do maybe 40 gigs a month if actively downloaded stuff. Otherwise I've seen 20 gig usage. Maybe rollover gigs? Or, I don't use 10 gigs so I want $1 a gig back.
exactly if the cap is 40 GB and you use 20 GB is TW going ot give you $20 back or a $20 credit? No. Ask them why and they'll tell you a GB isn't worth $1.

They could chrge 20 cents per GB and still make agood profit. Although the idea shouldn't be to make a profit from overage fees, but to take that money and reinvest it into infrastructure so caps aren't even necessary.

Thursday, 31-May 08:26:09 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics