Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Time Warner Cable Explores Fiber To The Home » No choice really
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
unless someone can make a business case... »
« AT&T is being left in the dust  
AuthorAll Replies

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
reply to baineschile
Re: No choice really

What is the price difference on doing a complete install rather than just upgrading an area?

The D3 modems cost a lot more than $50 ea and the D3 CMTS are not free either.


Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
It's cheaper than laying last mile fiber. D3 modems are also cheaper than ONTs.

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO
I have no doubt that is cheaper, but by how much? If it is only 30% cheaper then it would be more cost effective to go with fiber (again for fresh areas).


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq


1 edit
said by Lazlow See Profile :

I have no doubt that is cheaper, but by how much? If it is only 30% cheaper then it would be more cost effective to go with fiber (again for fresh areas).
With no home visits required for D3 upgrades I'd wager that the costs could be 50-60% cheaper overall, even if you have to upgrade all of the amps and nodes in the HFC plant.

It really only makes sense for cable MSOs to do fiber in new infrastructure installs where they will already be trenching to individual homes anyway.

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

Here in Charter land in the areas that they have upgraded to 60Mbps(very limited) they have had to replace a lot of lines (and presumably other hardware). Now admittedly a lot of that probably should have been replaced years ago just for general maintenance. That is why I was asking for the price difference ON FRESH AREAS(no upgrades), so that we could see apples to apples. There is no doubt that limited upgrades would be significantly cheaper.

jimbo2150

join:2004-05-10
Youngstown, OH

reply to espaeth
said by espaeth See Profile :

With no home visits required for D3 upgrades I'd wager that the costs could be 50-60% cheaper overall, even if you have to upgrade all of the amps and nodes in the HFC plant.
What about D3 modems? I'm sure 90% of customers are not going to know how to install it. I may know that all it takes is hooking in a few wires, but most are not technically inclined. Also, my co uses a line filter that I am sure is designed for D1 or 2 and will need replacing. No home visit? Think again.
--

- "Techie" Jim


maartena
Stacked.
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to Lazlow
said by Lazlow See Profile :

I have no doubt that is cheaper, but by how much? If it is only 30% cheaper then it would be more cost effective to go with fiber (again for fresh areas).
Fiber cable by itself is a lot more expensive to produce then copper cable. Also with deployment you need to be sure that fiber can never bend at more than a certain degree corner, which makes turning the corner at a pole a little more challenging. Doable no problem, but deploying copper is cheaper by far.

The only reason to deploy fiber now to those new areas is so that they don't have to in 10, 20 years from now and incur the costs twice.


Anonymous_
Anonymous
Premium
join:2004-06-21
127.0.0.1
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP

said by maartena See Profile :

said by Lazlow See Profile :

I have no doubt that is cheaper, but by how much? If it is only 30% cheaper then it would be more cost effective to go with fiber (again for fresh areas).
Fiber cable by itself is a lot more expensive to produce then copper cable. Also with deployment you need to be sure that fiber can never bend at more than a certain degree corner
false

ever noitce the fiber that is coiled up on power poles
-
Forums » Time Warner Cable Explores Fiber To The Homeunless someone can make a business case... »
« AT&T is being left in the dust  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 15:26:54 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [79] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [77] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· DK Weapon Upgrade [World of Warcraft]
· LFM Overkill [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [WIN7] Outlook express under Windows 7? [Microsoft Help]