republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Efficient » Ip Filter Rules appear magicaly
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
« Ip Filter Rules appear magicaly  
AuthorAll Replies

easpc

join:2009-02-12
Seaside, OR

reply to graysonf
Re: Ip Filter Rules appear magicaly

thank you for your quick reply, well yes as a mater of fact I recognize those ips involved they are valid IPs. The rules involve allowing UDP packages to various ports for instance here are a couple rules:
2028 P,E,N permit in UDP any WAN Interface any any any any WAN Interface 192.168. 2. 48 host = 8941 no
2030 P,E,N permit in UDP any WAN Interface any any any any WAN Interface 192.168. 9.113 host = 14200 no
I didn't know the rules could be created on the fly, I supposed that only the administrator could add or edit rules, but you were correct, uPNP was enabled, I've just disabled it to see if that corrects the problem.


graysonf
Premium,MVM
join:1999-07-16
Fort Lauderdale, FL

The purpose of uPNP is to open and forward ports automatically on the fly based on what client applications on your LAN need in order to work.

The upside is that this happens automatically and you don't have to set the rules up by hand. For apps that need to have random, not possible to identify in advance ports opened, this can make the difference between an app working or not working. I believe this is "better" than manually opening large ranges of ports to accommodate apps.

The downside is, that since you didn't set these rules up, they can become questionable once discovered, as has happened to you.

easpc

join:2009-02-12
Seaside, OR
Until now, I didn't know what difference Upnp would have in my network, now I know. Thank you very much.


graysonf
Premium,MVM
join:1999-07-16
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Yer welcome.
-
Forums » Equipment Support » Hardware By Brand » Efficient« Ip Filter Rules appear magicaly  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 15:45:22 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [92] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [65] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [58] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
Most people now reading
· MicroSoft Discontinues Sale of Windows 7 Family Pack in US [Microsoft Help]
· Cross Server Dungeon Experience [World of Warcraft]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· The aftermath [World of Warcraft]
· Woo hoo for snow! [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Warrior tank seem underpowered these days [World of Warcraft]
· CRTC hearing on Monday [TekSavvy]
· Adobe Flash Player version 10.0.42.34 [Security]