http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21909888 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:27:49 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:27:49 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21913892 said by DataRiker:

I guess what they are implicitly saying is that all encrypted traffic will be throttled now.
I wonder if encrypted email will bite the dust as well.
--
"In the future, that which is not mandatory will be illegal"]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21913892 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:04:56 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21913222
i don't have enough time right now to explain the emule behavior but clients would just drop off.

have not tested without encryption recently for a baseline

have not had the need too, all my torrents now reach over 1 MB/s (well with seeds that is)

actually I am very happy with cox for now, works awesome, except for that brief time period]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21913222 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:33:09 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21911823 said by DataRiker:

I guess what they are implicitly saying is that all encrypted traffic will be throttled now.

ever p2p application i use now has encryption options, eg bit torrent, and emule (they call it obfuscation), which until now seems to have been working, so I guess i can kiss that goodbye
Well you aren't in the trial area (Kansas and Arkansas) so you shouldn't be noticing anything. Are you?

Forget about the encryption options in BitTorrent and eMule as they are not likely to be effective. Today's DPI includes looking across multiple packets and the pattern/directions/lengths of the packets to guess at the protocols. So it'll be necessary (once again) for the P2P obfuscation to evolve to break up those predictable patterns. And so the world turns. Fortunately, the P2P developers can do this easily.

SOAPBOX
Profit-driven network vendors get rich selling these new "solutions" to the foolish business suits inside ISPs (who haven't yet matured to realize the futility of it all). Some tech libertarians think we ought not have Network Neutrality regulation because ultimately, the Internet works around roadblocks anyway so regulations would be unnecessary. True to a point, but regulations would help prevent ISPs from making such dumb decisions in the first place and would return network vendors back to job 1 -- innovating in the space that actually grows the capacity of the network, not simply reshuffles it.
/SOAPBOX
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL
... Do something! ...]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21911823 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:31:18 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21911612
ever p2p application i use now has encryption options, eg bit torrent, and emule (they call it obfuscation), which until now seems to have been working, so I guess i can kiss that goodbye]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21911612 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:00:20 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21910357 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Really-21910357 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:34:08 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Really-21909888 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Really-21909888 Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:29:10 EDT