<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: caps....&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21925443</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:12:16 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:12:16 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-22216481</link>
<description><![CDATA[vinnie97 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1206900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1206900');">fiberguy</a>:</small><br><br>But, do you know what the charging for overage really says to me? ... it says "We know that liberal socialists are going to tear into our core business over their golden internet service and hurt us bad, so get used to us shifting our income to the internet where you want it to be"... <br><br>It's called priming the marketplace. <br><br>Everyone wants to shove everything and the kitchen sink down the internet line... and that's fine.. many people see "great savings" with the internet.. however, it's a pipe dream. The costs that you avoided in savings only come back in another form elsewhere.. what you're going to see is that most of your money will go down the pipe in the form in the internet. <br><br>You're going to see the internet, and services, become that of the airlines and their baggage fees. I guess no one saw bag fees coming a while ago when they started charging $10 to book a ticket over the phone? Only, the fees people are going to get hit for, online, are going to make baggage fees look like a cake walk. <br><br>Expenses don't go away, unless you do with out. They only go to other places. That's how the economy works. <br> </div>I'm not talking about everything and the kitchen sink, just a tolerable cap like Comcast is using.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-22216481</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:40:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21931685</link>
<description><![CDATA[joetaxpayer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1206900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1206900');">fiberguy</a>:</small><br><br>You're not going to get "unlimited".. that was a lesson learned WAY back in the 90's that unlimited didn't pay.<br><br>250 is just fine, for these days. <br> </div>I agree with two conditions;<br>The ISP provide a meter that's at least within 24 hrs accurate. And the overage charges be somewhat reasonable. <br><br>These two conditions will at least give the user a choice. If I am at 250GB already, and still want to watch 2 Netflix movies, well, it will cost me. <br><br>Those over even 100GB are the vocal minority, and likely heavy video streaming users. As IPTV becomes more popular, I can see the caps becoming an issue for more people. A large family with multiple TiVos trying to view a lot of HD video during summer break, and the caps are easy to blow through.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21931685</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:54:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21931419</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : But, do you know what the charging for overage really says to me? ... it says "We know that liberal socialists are going to tear into our core business over their golden internet service and hurt us bad, so get used to us shifting our income to the internet where you want it to be"... <br><br>It's called priming the marketplace. <br><br>Everyone wants to shove everything and the kitchen sink down the internet line... and that's fine.. many people see "great savings" with the internet.. however, it's a pipe dream. The costs that you avoided in savings only come back in another form elsewhere.. what you're going to see is that most of your money will go down the pipe in the form in the internet. <br><br>You're going to see the internet, and services, become that of the airlines and their baggage fees. I guess no one saw bag fees coming a while ago when they started charging $10 to book a ticket over the phone? Only, the fees people are going to get hit for, online, are going to make baggage fees look like a cake walk. <br><br>Expenses don't go away, unless you do with out. They only go to other places. That's how the economy works. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21931419</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:08:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21928711</link>
<description><![CDATA[vinnie97 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1206900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1206900');">fiberguy</a>:</small><br><br>My only issue is that the so called ceiling is a "limit".. and limits are not acceptable. When the so called "limit" is hit, they need to either throttle speeds down to a much lower level, OR charge for overage.</div>I would have ZERO problems with them doing the former...too bad most of the providers are considering doing the latter.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21928711</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:08:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21927968</link>
<description><![CDATA[older dog posted : Part of the problem is that a few years back Frontier suffered a takeover. Frontier had built a nationwide fiber backbone with the expectation that this would enable them to provide reasonable prices for their customers and a good return on investment.<br><br>After the take over they had the Telco side sold off.<br>This left them unable to compete in the manner they had planned on.<br><br>Frontier should be the poster boy for what happens when mergers and takeovers are given without proper consideration for how it may affect the company's ability to provide the service it was in business to do. This is not a problem for company's that face competition but it is a problem when they are monopolies who must also serve the public interest.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21927968</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:40:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21925923</link>
<description><![CDATA[fiberguy posted : You're not going to get "unlimited".. that was a lesson learned WAY back in the 90's that unlimited didn't pay.<br><br>250 is just fine, for these days. My only issue is that the so called ceiling is a "limit".. and limits are not acceptable. When the so called "limit" is hit, they need to either throttle speeds down to a much lower level, OR charge for overage. <br><br>Caps and tiers are nothing new to the internet... just residential services is all. If you give someone or a large group of people 'unlimited' anything, there will always be some that abuse it. ANYONE with an ounce of brains knows that you can't lasso in those that do abuse something while not treating everyone else the same way... ask any class action lawyer that. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21925923</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:52:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21925732</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kfedka posted : The sweet spot is unlimited not 250gb. 250gb in 2005 would have been maybe, but not today.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-caps-21925732</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:17:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>caps....</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/caps-21925443</link>
<description><![CDATA[neufuse posted : anything under 100GB is BS... 250GB is the sweet spot, and comcast knew this, why can't everyone else see this also... now WISP's need a lower cap obviously because of the technology behind it... 10GB would be the sweet spot there]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/caps-21925443</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:31:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

