<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Oh NOEZ!&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929286</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:55:42 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:55:42 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21935490</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/183489" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=183489');">ifarrell</a>:</small><br><br>The FCC can deny a station shutting down it's analog transmission if it is in the public's best interest.<br>See this article.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/74204" >www.tvtechnology.com/article/74204</A><br> </div>Yes, they can.  However, they didn't exercise that authority except in a few instances, less than 5% of all stations, and only when it was the last analog standing in a market.  By the way, they could also order the station shut down entirely if necessary "if it is in the public's best interest", so that is not terribly relevant.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21935490</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:20:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21935263</link>
<description><![CDATA[PGHammer posted : The FCC went directly to the network heads and urged them to keep their O&Os and affiliates (at least those in the top fifty DMAs) broadcasting in analog up to the new June deadline.  Surprisingly, the loudest screaming (at least from the broadcasters) could be seen (and heard) coming from Washington, DC (and especially at the two test stations for DTV, WRC-TV/DT and WUSA-TV/DT), as they were decidedly NOT happy with the forced delay.  The delay has put WUSA-TV/DT in particular into a bind, as they had figured to open up a commanding lead over WRC-TV/DT, as the NBC O&O is now the only "Big Four" station in the DMA not to have local news in HD (WUSA was the first, and both WJLA and WTTG switched to local news in HD within the past two weeks).  Even worse, Gannett (owners of WUSA) has been leading the CBS affiliated stations, and have managed to actually get to one hundred-percent conversion (something which CBS itself has not managed to do with their Owned Stations Group *yet*).<br><br>Once again, the chiefs may be happy with the delay; however, the troops (operations and engineering staff) largely aren't.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21935263</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:39:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21934500</link>
<description><![CDATA[cdru posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1048555" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1048555');">BF69</a>:</small><br><br>Everyone would just think he was a typcial slacker of his generation.<br> </div>Every generation has slackers, at least in the eyes of the generations older then the accused.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21934500</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 06:55:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21934351</link>
<description><![CDATA[thender posted : This has alwyas been the worst site on the web IMO for sarcasm detection. Everything will be taken literally and in the most twisted manner possible. Resistance is futile. :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21934351</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:38:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21934332</link>
<description><![CDATA[ifarrell posted : The FCC can deny a station shutting down it's analog transmission if it is in the public's best interest.<br>See this article.<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.tvtechnology.com/article/74204" >www.tvtechnology.com/article/74204</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21934332</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:23:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932523</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : LOL...I'll see if I can get you some Chicago deep dish...  :D<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932523</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:33:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932306</link>
<description><![CDATA[mod_wastrel posted : More importantly... now I'm hungry for pizza.<br>(baked... cheese... on a crust)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932306</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:53:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932279</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : The FCC's "analog dark notification" STA process was almost complete when Congress moved the cheese, which required that it start all over again and be done by Feb. 9 if you wanted to shut down tonight.  As you noted most decided to just let it slide and wait until June.  However, this was mostly a recordkeeping exercise except in those cases where no analog was going to remain on.  I don't think this was the most well-baked plan but once Congress got into the act (again) this was probably the best they could do on such short notice.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932279</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:48:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932255</link>
<description><![CDATA[mod_wastrel posted : Most stations didn't even apply to transition early, so I have to interpret the assertion--correctly or incorrectly--as applying only to those that did actually apply. Given so few, relatively, that are transitioning, I'm dubious of there being a nightlight problem, except in a few localities... certainly not more than 100. At worst, though, I just think the FCC is being very "nit-picky" about some of the requests. All in all it means nothing to me; on the rare occasions when I do watch TV, I watch the digital channels. They may not be at full power yet, but there's still a better signal than what I could get with analog. I do think the term "special dispensation" is, however, accurate; but that doesn't mean I think there's any "conspiracy"... just the usual red tape from the govt.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932255</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:44:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932195</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Those conditions were generally met, but only one in a market needed to be the nightlight.  That is a separate issue from the actual deadline.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932195</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:32:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932187</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Go back and apply some reading comprehension to the thread instead of putting things in that weren't said in an attempt to prop up your flimsy argument.<br><br>The FCC is not the reason the huge majority of stations decided to wait until June 12.  The original assertion was that "most of those station that do not switch did not get the special dispensation from the FCC".  Most did not switch because they decided not to.<br><br>By the way, the original deadline is/was tonight at midnight.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932187</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:31:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932175</link>
<description><![CDATA[mod_wastrel posted : "In order to receive permission for the switch, the stations had to comply with a number of conditions, including:<br><br>&#8226;Providing the low-level "nightlight" service for 60 days after the switch to ensure viewers can access public affairs and news information safely;</li><br>&#8226; Increasing educational efforts on how to make the switch from analog to digital signals, including how to set up converter boxes;</li><br>&#8226; Providing toll-free telephone numbers and local "walk-in" centers to help educate viewers on the switch and what they need to do;</li><br>&#8226; Ensuring that DTV transition information is broadcast in both English and Spanish and accessible to the disabled."</li><br><br>Seems like the same ole rigamarole to me but, denied is still denied.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932175</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:29:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932146</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Because they were the last ones to file their STA, and would leave their market with no analog service.  Had they gotten their shit together earlier they would not have been standing without a chair when the music stopped.<br> </div>Then the comment "the FCC didn't deny anyone permission" is false now isn't it?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932146</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:22:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932115</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Because they were the last ones to file their STA, and would leave their market with no analog service.  Had they gotten their shit together earlier they would not have been standing without a chair when the music stopped.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932115</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:17:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932096</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>You assert that the FCC prevented them from turning off the analog.  That is incorrect.<br> </div>Then explain how 43 stations were not allowed by the FCC to shut down analog?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932096</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:13:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932076</link>
<description><![CDATA[BF69 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/171387" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=171387');">scooper</a>:</small><br><br>And it's NOT the over 55 crowd that's holding this up - it's 18-30 crowd who are least prepared.</div>But you can't state actual facts. If you say it's the 25 year olds that aren't ready, not the 75 year olds, you wouldn't get the sympathy you need to get support for the delay. No one cares if some 25 year old failed to get ready or educate themselves. Everyone would just think he was a typcial slacker of his generation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932076</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:10:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932046</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Yup.  Those 106 waited too long to file or had some other malady.  But they are less than 10% of full power TV stations and don't support the arguments of some who claim the FCC derailed the entire thing.  This happened because the NTIA screwed the pooch.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21932046</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:06:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21931931</link>
<description><![CDATA[mod_wastrel posted : The FCC denied the requests of 106 stations to switch to digital (only) on grounds that "early termination (of analog broadcasting) poses a significant risk of substantial public harm." The stations in question didn't meet all of the FCC's requirements for an "early" switchover.<br><br>They're willin' to switch, wantin' to switch, now... waitin'... till June.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21931931</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21931653</link>
<description><![CDATA[Subaru posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/693768" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=693768');">fifty nine</a>:</small><br><br>And the former UPN stations are now "MyNetwork TV."<br> </div>yep and one and awhile they do a programing on switching to DTV]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21931653</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:49:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21931411</link>
<description><![CDATA[joetaxpayer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/881817" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=881817');">CrazyFingers</a>:</small><br><br>I for one have zero respect for people with loose signals.  I mean, what kind of example does it set for our children when signals are just flopping around loose, all willy-nilly?<br>I say it is high time we tightened up our loose signals, and quickly! <br> </div>Doesn't the Duct Tape/ WD40 dichotomy get enacted here?<br>Duct Tape for the loose thing you wish to keep in place, WD40 for the things too tight you wish to loosen.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21931411</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:07:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21931280</link>
<description><![CDATA[CrazyFingers posted : I for one have zero respect for people with loose signals.  I mean, what kind of example does it set for our children when signals are just flopping around loose, all willy-nilly?<br>I say it is high time we tightened up our loose signals, and quickly! <br><small>--<br>Burrow owl...burrow owl...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21931280</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:45:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930716</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Enjoy your incorrect-ness.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930716</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:04:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930709</link>
<description><![CDATA[CylonRed posted : I give up... I stand by my posts - PERIOD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930709</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:03:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930656</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Not really.  Your argument is that the FCC somehow prevented them from shutting analog off.  There is no "ruling"...most had already applied for the Feb. 17 go-dark STA and they did not reapply once the deadline was extended for purely hysterical reasons.  It's called February Sweeps and television programmers are even more skittish than radio programmers.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930656</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:56:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930560</link>
<description><![CDATA[CylonRed posted : Ok - that is a bit different than your previous posting.  Not knowing any owners (but I would bet you don't either) and not knowing if the FCC has nay fines/penalties possible - it was an educated guess as to the real reason why they did not switch instead of the reason the post I replied to assigns (which was they were not ready).<br><br>If they blinked or got cold feet because of the FCC 'ruling' - then my post is still 100% correct.  They could switch but the FCC prevented it - real or imagined by management - it makes no difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930560</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:40:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930518</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : You assert that the FCC prevented them from turning off the analog.  That is incorrect.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930518</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:34:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930495</link>
<description><![CDATA[CylonRed posted : I never made any assumption that the stations were not ready to go.  Actually stated the opposite - that most WERE ready but did not get the FCC ok to go on time.  Don;t care if it was because of management cold feet - I never made hte assumption most stations were not ready.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930495</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:30:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930463</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : Nope, your assumption that they aren't ready to go is incorrect.  That some suit in an office 1000 miles away got cold feet doesn't make the station any less ready, and the FCC is not standing in their way unless you're the last station in a market to turn off analog. <br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930463</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:25:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930433</link>
<description><![CDATA[fifty nine posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/681625" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=681625');">taz291819</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/906493" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=906493');">knightmb</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Very few stations aren't ready to go.  The major network O&Os, though, decided to wait until June 12.  That was a corporate decision not necessarily supported by local management or engineering.<br> </div>I agree, I'm sure there is some corporate gears in the works, but looking from the outside of (is it on or not), in my area at least. A Christian station, WNAB (the WB), UPN, and Fox all switched. The big '3' though (ABC, NBC, CBS) remain analog? I mean, they do and they don't have DTV going because it's still too weak to pick up or they just haven't switched the power switch from low to high yet.<br><br>Is it any surprise that the little stations more faster than the big ones or is it just corporate slugs that are big really move that slow?  :D<br> </div>Umm, there is no such thing as The WB and/or UPN anymore.  Both of those networks shut down a couple of years ago, and formed The CW.<br> </div>And the former UPN stations are now "MyNetwork TV."]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930433</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:20:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930421</link>
<description><![CDATA[CylonRed posted : Nope to what?  The post seems to at one point - agree with me that most were ready to go, but then backtracks inthe same sentence.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930421</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:18:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930253</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/170109" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=170109');">CylonRed</a>:</small><br><br>Probably more correct to say that most of those station that do not switch did not get the special dispensation from the FCC.  I bet the vast majority were able to go digital but the FCC would not let them - thank god my area is not affected - they are all going digital today like all of them should have done. </div>Nope.  Most were ready to go technically but someone upstairs blinked.  Nothing like a ratings period to shrink corporate weenie.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930253</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:52:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930141</link>
<description><![CDATA[taz291819 posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/906493" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=906493');">knightmb</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Very few stations aren't ready to go.  The major network O&Os, though, decided to wait until June 12.  That was a corporate decision not necessarily supported by local management or engineering.<br> </div>I agree, I'm sure there is some corporate gears in the works, but looking from the outside of (is it on or not), in my area at least. A Christian station, WNAB (the WB), UPN, and Fox all switched. The big '3' though (ABC, NBC, CBS) remain analog? I mean, they do and they don't have DTV going because it's still too weak to pick up or they just haven't switched the power switch from low to high yet.<br><br>Is it any surprise that the little stations more faster than the big ones or is it just corporate slugs that are big really move that slow?  :D<br> </div>Umm, there is no such thing as The WB and/or UPN anymore.  Both of those networks shut down a couple of years ago, and formed The CW.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930141</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:31:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21930137</link>
<description><![CDATA[joetaxpayer posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by holycrow :</small><br><br>Seriously, wishing death on people?  For what?  It matters so much to you that you get your DTV, and get it NOW, that you'd wish death on people who'd lose their signal completely if not delayed til all this stuff is worked out?<br>You both are remarkable examples.<br> </div>I read those remarks as sarcastic, not the same as you did.<br>Esp since I'm sure pnh102 is aware there are *only* abour 300 million people in the US, and according to PT Barnum's theory, about only 30 million are clueless. I don't know that the planet can ever support a trillion people, at least not until there's fiber to every home.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21930137</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:30:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930010</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jigsaw posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/952403" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=952403');">SSX4life</a>:</small><br><br>These people deserve to die if that is the case.  Old / senile / and incompetent... do we really need to hold onto analog THAT much longer for those people that don't get it?<br> </div><br><small>--<br>"It's called the American dream because you have to be asleep to believe it."-George Carlin<br></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=2 WIDTH=66%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21930010?c=1401385&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTkyOTQzMy54bWw%3D"><IMG TITLE="14913 bytes" BORDER=0 WIDTH=316 HEIGHT=268 SRC="/r0/download/1401385~ca0612b07787f0d2516c9ee8e5cf9341/ddd3b2f0d418e7ed43ef8b48321a2f34.jpg"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21930010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:02:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929977</link>
<description><![CDATA[CylonRed posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/906493" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=906493');">knightmb</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br>According to some, we could see billions, possibly trillions, of innocent, completely unsuspecting people DIE SLOW PAINFUL DEATHS because they had no clue this was coming!<br> </div>Alarmist are we?  :D<br><br>Actually, just proves that even with the deadline, a lot of stations weren't *really* ready like everyone thought they were. So all the nay sayers about all those *other* people who will never be ready no matter what, turns out the stations were the same way.<br> </div>Probably more correct to say that most of those station that do not switch did not get the special dispensation from the FCC.  I bet the vast majority were able to go digital but the FCC would not let them - thank god my area is not affected - they are all going digital today like all of them should have done.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929977</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:55:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: &#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21929794</link>
<description><![CDATA[djrobx posted : I'm hoping the DTV delay allows converter box manufacturers more time to include a captioning feature for the sarcastically impaired. <br><small>--<br><b>AT&T U-Hearse</b><br>Your funeral. Delivered.<br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21929794</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:16:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929772</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : It's mostly a ratings decision.  They're all ready to go and have been for months...years in some cases where the post-transition channel is the same as the interim channel.<br><br>The smaller stations have little motivation and less budget to keep analog going.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929772</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:11:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929758</link>
<description><![CDATA[knightmb posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/171387" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=171387');">scooper</a>:</small><br><br>The STATIONS ARE ready. It's Joe Sixpack consumer who doesn't realize that just about all (but not 100%) broadcasters have been broadcasting a digital as well as analog signal for the past couple years.<br><br>Even at that , as a nation we are over 95% ready (between cable/satellite and digital TVs / converter boxes) - the original legislation only required 85% for a particular market to go.<br><br>And it's NOT the over 55 crowd that's holding this up - it's 18-30 crowd who are least prepared.<br><br>Let's just require all FOX stations to power down analog on "American Idol" night and we'll see how fast that crowd will get ready....<br> </div>LOL and yet probably so true  :D , the last part certainly deserves a thumbs up.  ;)<br><small>--<br>Fight NebuAD and the like:<br><A HREF="http://wanip.org/anti-nebuad/">Click Here to pollute their data</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929758</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:09:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929751</link>
<description><![CDATA[knightmb posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/157889" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=157889');">RadioDoc</a>:</small><br><br>Very few stations aren't ready to go.  The major network O&Os, though, decided to wait until June 12.  That was a corporate decision not necessarily supported by local management or engineering.<br> </div>I agree, I'm sure there is some corporate gears in the works, but looking from the outside of (is it on or not), in my area at least. A Christian station, WNAB (the WB), UPN, and Fox all switched. The big '3' though (ABC, NBC, CBS) remain analog? I mean, they do and they don't have DTV going because it's still too weak to pick up or they just haven't switched the power switch from low to high yet.<br><br>Is it any surprise that the little stations more faster than the big ones or is it just corporate slugs that are big really move that slow?  :D<br><small>--<br>Fight NebuAD and the like:<br><A HREF="http://wanip.org/anti-nebuad/">Click Here to pollute their data</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929751</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:08:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929732</link>
<description><![CDATA[jay_rm posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/952403" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=952403');">SSX4life</a>:</small><br><br>These people deserve to die if that is the case.  Old / senile / and incompetent... do we really need to hold onto analog THAT much longer for those people that don't get it?<br> </div>I think if you bothered to actually RESEARCH the subject, you would find that the majority of unprepared parties are YOUNG / CLUELESS / MORONS (possibly like you)...<br><small>--<br>3500/512 5.7 GHz Motorola Canopy Wireless; FoxValley.net<br>'It looks just like a Telefunken U47 !'</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929732</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>&#x22;I want my DTV and I WANT IT NOW&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21929724</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br>According to some, we could see billions, possibly trillions, of innocent, completely unsuspecting people DIE SLOW PAINFUL DEATHS because they had no clue this was coming!<br> </div><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/952403" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=952403');">SSX4life</a>:</small><br><br>These people deserve to die if that is the case.  Old / senile / and incompetent... do we really need to hold onto analog THAT much longer for those people that don't get it?<br> </div>Both of you should be ashamed of yourselves, but I'd bet you aren't.<br><br>Seriously, wishing death on people?  For what?  It matters so much to you that you get your DTV, and get it NOW, that you'd wish death on people who'd loose their signal completely if not delayed til all this stuff is worked out?<br><br>You both are remarkable examples.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/I-want-my-DTV-and-I-WANT-IT-NOW-21929724</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929583</link>
<description><![CDATA[RadioDoc posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/906493" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=906493');">knightmb</a>:</small><br><br>Where I live, all the major stations didn't bother with the switch over, surprising it was the little "UHF" stations that were quicker to change over than them, go figure  :huh:</div>Almost all stations except those forced to flash-cut on their existing analog channel have been broadcasting a digital signal for months...some for years...now.  This is not so much a switchover than a discontinuance of redundant transmission.<br><br>Those little UHF stations probably could not afford the cost of running their 100 KW+ transmitters past today and shut them off as planned (and budgeted).<br><br>Very few stations aren't ready to go.  The major network O&Os, though, decided to wait until June 12.  That was a corporate decision not necessarily supported by local management or engineering.<br><small>--<br>Toolmaster of La Grange.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929583</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:33:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929532</link>
<description><![CDATA[scooper posted : The STATIONS ARE ready. It's Joe Sixpack consumer who doesn't realize that just about all (but not 100%) broadcasters have been broadcasting a digital as well as analog signal for the past couple years.<br><br>Even at that , as a nation we are over 95% ready (between cable/satellite and digital TVs / converter boxes) - the original legislation only required 85% for a particular market to go.<br><br>And it's NOT the over 55 crowd that's holding this up - it's 18-30 crowd who are least prepared.<br><br>Let's just require all FOX stations to power down analog on "American Idol" night and we'll see how fast that crowd will get ready....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929532</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:25:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929433</link>
<description><![CDATA[knightmb posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/625141" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=625141');">pnh102</a>:</small><br><br>According to some, we could see billions, possibly trillions, of innocent, completely unsuspecting people DIE SLOW PAINFUL DEATHS because they had no clue this was coming!<br> </div>Alarmist are we?  :D<br><br>Actually, just proves that even with the deadline, a lot of stations weren't *really* ready like everyone thought they were. So all the nay sayers about all those *other* people who will never be ready no matter what, turns out the stations were the same way.<br><br>Where I live, all the major stations didn't bother with the switch over, surprising it was the little "UHF" stations that were quicker to change over than them, go figure  :huh:<br><br>Enjoy your DTV or what few stations have switched. Last I checked with all of those *other* people, a lot of outlining areas can't pick up the *new* stations that switched last night, too bad I guess.  :(<br><small>--<br>Fight NebuAD and the like:<br><A HREF="http://wanip.org/anti-nebuad/">Click Here to pollute their data</a></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Oh-NOEZ-21929433</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:57:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Oh NOEZ!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Oh-NOEZ-21929286</link>
<description><![CDATA[pnh102 posted : According to some, we could see billions, possibly trillions, of innocent, completely unsuspecting people DIE SLOW PAINFUL DEATHS because they had no clue this was coming!<br><small>--<br>Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Oh-NOEZ-21929286</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:18:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

