Big Dawg 23
join:2002-03-27
Northfield, MN
| reply to neftv
Re: Realistic unlimited plans not $99
Verizon and AT&T have no need to change. They are adding subscribers so there isn't a need. Besides look how long sprint had the $99 unlimited everything plan. They still lost 1 Million subscribers in the Fourth Quarter while Verizon and AT&T Grew. |
|
neftv
join:2000-10-01
Broomall, PA
 ·Broadvox Direct
| yea I see Sprint coverage as the reason for people leaving them. However, if one is in a metro area that has good Sprint coverage and you don't travel that much then I see Sprint good choice. I never had the service but I just looking at Maps for the Philadelphia, PA area. But that is just my opinion, I got to deep with Cingular then AT&T that I would have to wait a bit if I was to change.I like my 8310 to much that I probably go with Bold when time comes for me. |
|
DarnellP
join:2004-10-12
Las Vegas, NV
| reply to Big Dawg 23
said by Big Dawg 23  : They still lost 1 Million subscribers in the Fourth Quarter while Verizon and AT&T Grew. They may very well lose 1M subscribers, but they don't release their Q4 2008 numbers until tomorrow. |
|
kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to Big Dawg 23
said by Big Dawg 23 :Verizon and AT&T have no need to change. They are adding subscribers so there isn't a need. Except the point was that if they don't match TMO they could very well stop adding customers and start losing them...
--
[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.
[/BQUOTE] |
|
Big Dawg 23
join:2002-03-27
Northfield, MN | reply to DarnellP
Sorry not a Million 633,000. Data was released almost a month a go.
»www.goingcellular.com/sprint/spr···rs-4494/ |
|
bemis
join:2008-07-18
Stoneham, MA
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Comcast
·RCN CABLE
| reply to kamm
TMO coverage is very poor, about the only thing that saves them is their 850MHz roaming agreements--or at least that was true 2 years when I had them.
You were fine on a major highway outside urban areas, but if you were in an out lying suburb you frequently had no service...
I'd rather pay more and be able to use the phone everywhere, then pay less and find myself without service, even 10-20% of the time. |
|
