Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Verizon To Finally Crack Down On Spam » Boo
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Nonsense »
« Spamhaus Stats Missleadning  
kpatz
MY HEAD A SPLODE
Premium
join:2003-06-13
Manchester, NH

Re: Boo

Once again, legitimate users are penalized for the actions of a few bad apples.

That said, I'm ok with port 25 blocking, only if:

1) the block is outbound only, not inbound, and
2) users have an option of having the block removed upon request.

While the majority of "average" users don't need port 25 (provided the ISP's mail servers accept mail on an alternate port such as 587, and they educate the users on how to configure their email clients to use said port), there are legitimate uses for outbound port 25 for power users:

1. One may maintain an offsite mail server and need to test connectivity to said server on port 25.
2. One may be using a non-ISP email service that doesn't accept connections on ports other than 25.
2. One may use nmap or other port scanning tools, and such tools won't report blocked ports.

Also, blocking port 25 is merely a band-aid. Spammers will find other ways to spew their crap (such as posted elsewhere where some spammers were trying to social engineer authentication info from users). For every ISP that blocks 25, there are 10 more that don't have it blocked and the spammers will just go there. Plus, what's to stop spammers from using the bots they already have to issue a DDOS attack, which can be done, port 25 blocked or not.

It's better to boot infected users and get them to clean up their act, than it is to "band-aid" their hemorrhaging.
--
To ISPs: Leave our ports alone! If I want ports blocked, I'll do it myself, thank you.
NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

Re: Boo

said by kpatz See Profile :

It's better to boot infected users and get them to clean up their act, than it is to "band-aid" their hemorrhaging.
Might as well boot customers who lose their accounts to social engineering while you are at it.

Actually, this could be good for bandwidth hogs, as well. We'd probably be booting a significant (greater than 5%) percentage of the Internet users in the U.S. if we did this. Thus, fewer users chasing bandwidth. Those using their Internet connections heavily would have fewer competitors for bandwidth; a good thing in their eyes, I am sure.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
Forums » Verizon To Finally Crack Down On SpamNonsense »
« Spamhaus Stats Missleadning  


Sunday, 21-Mar 08:53:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10.5 years online! © 1999-2010 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [167] Comcast Confirms 100 Mbps Is Coming
· [126] What You Need To Know About The National Broadband Plan
· [103] The 'Electromagnetically Hypersensitive' Attack Smart Meters
· [76] The FCC Wants Your Thoughts On Comcast/NBC Merger
· [70] 'Lawn Fridges' Attack UK Lawns
· [59] Weekend Open Thread
· [54] FCC Releases Copy Of The National Broadband Plan
· [46] FCC Gives Final Sales Pitch For Broadband Plan
· [42] Satellite: The 'Rodney Dangerfield' Of Broadband Connectivity
· [41] Putting T-Mobile HSPA+ Through Its Paces
Most people now reading
· LCDguys File Server Pr0n :) - AKA The Horde :) [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Ashen Verdict Rep farming guide (ICC 10) [World of Warcraft]
· Disney owned HD channels coming 3/25 [OptimumOnline]
· Verizon not living up to price guarantee [Verizon Fiber Optics]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Windows 7 [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· What's your favorite Motherboard manufacturer? [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]