<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Re: Hmmmm&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hmmmm-21943956</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:14:22 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:14:22 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Hmmmm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hmmmm-21944031</link>
<description><![CDATA[ydoucare posted : nah, 10 meg isn't available.  Someone from the Embarq forum (not joey) managed to lower my first hop latency to 16. Fastpath or not, it's good enough for me. :) <br><br>&raquo;<a rel=nofollow HREF="http://www.speedtest.net/result/414469809.png" >www.speedtest.net/result/414469809.png</A> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Hmmmm-21944031</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:57:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Hmmmm</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hmmmm-21943956</link>
<description><![CDATA[Fox McCloud posted : if the equipment supports ADSL2+, then I'm fairly sure that it could support FastPath.<br><br>Could you order 10 meg, if you wanted to? If you can, then chances are the equipment can, in fact, support fastpath, as 10 meg requires fastpath.<br><br>in any event, if you had fastpath, that first-hop latency would definitely drop.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Hmmmm-21943956</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:44:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

