<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;CAPS&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CAPS-21948107</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:07:05 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:07:05 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: CAPS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21950210</link>
<description><![CDATA[jadebangle posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/489959" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=489959');">nasadude</a>:</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1365270" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1365270');">devnuller</a>:</small><br><br>Did someone mention CAPS yet!!!!  <br> </div>well, the article certainly didn't.<br><br>then again, I'm sure the writer got all his info from the cableco and they're certainly not going to mention it.<br> </div>I will tell you a secret the caps are more of a way to get you to use less bandwidth then a limitation.<br>Comcast do not really enforce caps<br>You have to be in their top 10 list to be warned about heavy usage so yes many that goes over 250gb a month are not warned. They look for user that are slowing everyone down rather then user that goes over 250GB<br>Its a bandwidth conservation tactic :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21950210</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:49:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CAPS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21948258</link>
<description><![CDATA[nasadude posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1365270" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1365270');">devnuller</a>:</small><br><br>Did someone mention CAPS yet!!!!  <br> </div>well, the article certainly didn't.<br><br>then again, I'm sure the writer got all his info from the cableco and they're certainly not going to mention it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21948258</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:15:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: CAPS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21948190</link>
<description><![CDATA[me1212 posted : Yeah, the thing said theres no word on that yet, but I agree, TWs would be worse at least CC has like 5x the cap. And throttling what about that!?!??!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-CAPS-21948190</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:05:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>CAPS</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CAPS-21948107</link>
<description><![CDATA[devnuller posted : Did someone mention CAPS yet!!!!  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/CAPS-21948107</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 12:51:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

