<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only? in </title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21961640</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:11:39 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 05:11:39 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21967493</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : I meant <b>if it only works with VZW</b> phones, of course. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21967493</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:51:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21964219</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...<br> </div>That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across <b>their</b> network to <b>their</b> DVRs.   :o<br> </div>Which is a nonsensical argument because you can order their <b>TV service alone</b> and if they would limit some feature to their wireless then <b>FCC would kick the shit out of them for anti-competitive beahviour</b>, rightfully so, I might add.<br> </div>I think you are confused here. This service is <b>FOR</b> people who have <u>Verizon</u> FIOS TV. All it does is allow you to schedule recordings on your <u>Verizon</u> DVR. How can they possibly be sued for offering a service that other carriers have been offering for years??? <br><small>--<br><b>When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat. <br>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21964219</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:50:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21963440</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...<br> </div>That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across <b>their</b> network to <b>their</b> DVRs.   :o<br> </div>Which is a nonsensical argument because you can order their <b>TV service alone</b> and if they would limit some feature to their wireless then <b>FCC would kick the shit out of them for anti-competitive beahviour</b>, rightfully so, I might add.<br><small>--<br>[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa.  You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true.  Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.<br> [/BQUOTE]</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21963440</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:41:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21962210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/771619"><b>yabos</b></A> : It's the American way]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21962210</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:09:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961640</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><b>blue_trooper</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...<br> </div>That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across <b>their</b> network to <b>their</b> DVRs.   :o<br> </div>As I've said elsewhere around here...  This wouldn't be an internet forum if somebody didn't mention a baseless class action suit every few days.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961640</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:24:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kamm <A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...<br> </div>That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across <b>their</b> network to <b>their</b> DVRs.   :o<br><small>--<br><b>When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat. <br>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961536</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:04:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/470214"><b>andunn</b></A> : I guess this is so they can say they have this as well and not just Directv.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961261</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:03:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Why VZ-only?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961252</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315019"><b>kamm</b></A> : I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21961252</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:00:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
