Topic 'Re: Why VZ-only?' in forum '' - dslreports.com http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961252 en Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:17:47 EDT Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:17:47 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21967493 if it only works with VZW phones, of course. :)]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21967493 Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:51:53 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21964219 said by kamm:

said by wifi4milez:

said by kamm:

I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...
That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across their network to their DVRs. :o
Which is a nonsensical argument because you can order their TV service alone and if they would limit some feature to their wireless then FCC would kick the shit out of them for anti-competitive beahviour, rightfully so, I might add.
I think you are confused here. This service is FOR people who have Verizon FIOS TV. All it does is allow you to schedule recordings on your Verizon DVR. How can they possibly be sued for offering a service that other carriers have been offering for years???
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21964219 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:50:16 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21963440 said by wifi4milez:

said by kamm:

I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...
That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across their network to their DVRs. :o
Which is a nonsensical argument because you can order their TV service alone and if they would limit some feature to their wireless then FCC would kick the shit out of them for anti-competitive beahviour, rightfully so, I might add.
--
[BQUOTE=[user=bicker]]Waaaa waaaa waaaa. You just want what you want and don't care to factor in what is right or true. Your perspectives are un-American, and deserve far more ridicule than I'm prepared to pile on them.
[/BQUOTE]]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21963440 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:41:33 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21962210 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21962210 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 12:09:17 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961640 said by wifi4milez:

said by kamm:

I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...
That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across their network to their DVRs. :o
As I've said elsewhere around here... This wouldn't be an internet forum if somebody didn't mention a baseless class action suit every few days.]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961640 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:24:48 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961536 said by kamm:

I smell a nicely groomed, fast-moving, incoming class action suit as soon as this service goes live across the board...
That doesnt make any sense at all. This is limited to VZ because its a service being provided across their network to their DVRs. :o
--
When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat.
-Ronald Reagan-
]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961536 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:04:18 EDT Re: Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961261 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Why-VZonly-21961261 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:03:18 EDT Why VZ-only? http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-VZonly-21961252 http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Why-VZonly-21961252 Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:00:30 EDT