<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato in Buffalo Tech</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21965805</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:34:15 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:34:15 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22159043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1109005"><b>tipstir</b></A> : Max on that is 251 on some routers using DD-WRT. 70mW is strong..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22159043</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:46:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22142467</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1515854"><b>darthboy</b></A> : sorry wrong]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22142467</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:26:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027965</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1358053"><b>LLigetfa</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  tipstir <A HREF="/useremail/u/1109005"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If stock is 32mW...<br> </div>Stock Buffalo at 100% is the same as 10mW in Tomato and dd-wrt.<br><br>IMHO dd-wrt default of 70mw is too high even if many people get away with it.<br><small>--<br>Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and formal education positively fortifies it. -- Stephen Vizinczey</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027965</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:49:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22023942</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1109005"><b>tipstir</b></A> : If stock is 32mW as the DD-WRT is 70mW that's what I run DD-WRT V24/SP2 on 2x of these and the Ethernet Converter. No issues!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22023942</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:24:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21970398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1358053"><b>LLigetfa</b></A> : Wireless range is very good on all 12 of my Buffalo WHR-HP-G54 routers running stock and even better when running Tomato and dd-wrt set to 32 mW.<br><small>--<br>Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and formal education positively fortifies it. -- Stephen Vizinczey</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21970398</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:21:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21969351</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Ok everything seems back to normal for now. Restarting the notebook did the trick, I think. Very strange. <br><br>Disappointing wireless performance was the reason I switched to Tomato.<br><br>Has anybody had problems with Buffalo's firmware with regard to wireless range or was wireless range always good with WHR-HP-G54s?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21969351</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:24:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HP-G54, Wireless range of Stock vs Tomato</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21965805</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I decided to go back to the stock firmware after using Tomato for awhile.<br><br>As far as I know the default transmit power, 10 mw, in Tomato puts out the same amount of power as 100% setting in the stock firmware.<br><br>Yet, my wireless range is a bit worse. With Tomato, I would almost always get 4 bars (full strength) in the farthest room on the 2nd floor. Now I get 1. Web surfing used to be perfect, like having an actual wire, but now it's impossible. Web sites will not respond.<br><br>If output power is the same, why did wireless range decrease? Are there some settings I need to change?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21965805</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:48:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
