site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
280
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

Oh come on

What about fiber?

music4praise

join:2006-02-22
Big Rapids, MI
Reviews:
·QuantumVoice

said by fifty nine:

What about fiber?
The headline said rural deployment. Can you imagine how much it would cost to run fiber in comparison? One LTE site could cover many square miles. If CenturyTel is serious, maybe folks in rural areas can finally see some decent speeds available.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2

reply to fifty nine

said by fifty nine:

What about fiber?
Not feasible...especially in today's economy. Properly done wireless deployments are much more economical for rural environments.

iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to fifty nine
It's rural. Fiber is expensive. LTE (still vaporware by the way) is cable-class capacity-wise, maybe ven DOCSIS 3, and you don't have to lay new wires. For rural areas where there might be only a few, or a few dozen, houses per square mile, wireless makes sense.

I believe Verizon is thinking of doing the same thing.


Friday, 01-Jun 01:36:53 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics