<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>1.6.2 Upgrade Thread in Verizon FIOS TV</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r21975310</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:19:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:19:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246959</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1627786"><b>stevofc</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  chinorider <A HREF="/useremail/u/1572274"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I received the 1.6.2 in So. Cal. on 4/14 as scheduled and I now have a problem that I never saw on 1.6.0.  On various HD channels, I will get a momentary loss of video and audio.  Usually lasts for 2 - 3 seconds.  When this happens I get a black screen and zero audio.  Anyone else seen this 'feature' with 1.6.2 ?<br> </div>Yeah, that has happened to me 3 times that I have noticed. Mine was updated April 7.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246959</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:47:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246775</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564383"><b>Mike Scott</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  vz cool tech <A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>There is no 1.6.3, the next update is 1.7, and it's rumored to be set for the summer.<br> </div>So in other words, CA will get it by Christmas...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246775</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:19:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246637</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1572274"><b>chinorider</b></A> : I received the 1.6.2 in So. Cal. on 4/14 as scheduled and I now have a problem that I never saw on 1.6.0.  On various HD channels, I will get a momentary loss of video and audio.  Usually lasts for 2 - 3 seconds.  When this happens I get a black screen and zero audio.  Anyone else seen this 'feature' with 1.6.2 ?  <br><br> :uhh: :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22246637</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:55:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22241053</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><b>vz cool tech</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  vz cool tech <A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>There is no 1.6.3, the next update is 1.7, and it's rumored to be set for the summer.<br> </div>Things seem to be runing good, quit while your ahead!<br> </div>Ha, like I have any control. Complaining to me about the patches is like complaining to the janitor of a school about the educational system. :P<br><br>That said, there were some issues not addressed by 1.6.2 and, hey, some minor problems caused by 1.6.2 which are to be fixed by the next patch.  I personally have heard of no additional patches coming before 1.7, but that doesn't necessarily mean that there aren't any. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22241053</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:06:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  vz cool tech <A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>There is no 1.6.3, the next update is 1.7, and it's rumored to be set for the summer.<br> </div>Things seem to be runing good, quit while your ahead!<br> </div>Actually, there was discussion a couple of weeks ago of another patch before 1.7, but they have to get all the "powers that be" to agree to it, I don't know currently where it stands.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240621</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:57:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240589</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  vz cool tech <A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>There is no 1.6.3, the next update is 1.7, and it's rumored to be set for the summer.<br> </div>Things seem to be runing good, quit while your ahead!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240589</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:53:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1634153"><b>vz cool tech</b></A> : There is no 1.6.3, the next update is 1.7, and it's rumored to be set for the summer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22240398</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:23:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22238398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Baff <A HREF="/useremail/u/1509282"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Downloading in CA now.  Guess it must be time to start talking about 1.6.3 now.<br> </div>screw 1.6.3, I want 1.7 or 2.0!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22238398</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:13:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564383"><b>Mike Scott</b></A> : I couldn't tell the difference with regards to the PQ of the SD. Then again, I had just awoken so my vision might have been blurred a little. Will have to check it again after work. Nice to see channels with logos.<br><br>Will also have to see if the box still decides to crap out on me by disabling the HDMI signal to the TV when I start watching a show on the DVR. A pain to have to reboot the box...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233584</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:55:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233337</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1523924"><b>airdale123</b></A> : I live in Keller, TX and I have noticed "bugs" in the 1.6.2 upgrade.  I have the HD 7100 STB box.   Using the remote to flip thru channels using the up or down arrows, the channels remain without changing.  I have to hit the up or down arrow on the remote to change channels.  I have completely rebooted the STB, still the same problem.  I also have tried by completely deleted my "Favorites" and re-established them and problems still continue using the remote.   Any suggestions?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233337</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:01:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233237</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1251487"><b>bwintx</b></A> : Awakened to the "clicks" at 4:15 AM (CDT) today here in Plano, TX. Have an HD DVR but only an SDTV (have hoped to do better but haven't yet), so could detect no PQ change, of course.<br><br>Did notice successful elimination of "stutter" on the skip key, as well as indication in DVR listings of how many items are in each folder (as applicable).<br><br>Don't really care about a one-channel mini-guide either way, since I rarely use it.<br><br>Also noticed that self-diagnostics came up successful on the DNS parameter, which hasn't been true for a long time. No idea on that one.<br><br>Summation: I'm good w/ 1.6.2. Hope you fortunate HDTV owners are, too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233237</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:28:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233230</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1351321"><b>justin9876</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  PJL <A HREF="/useremail/u/1568454"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>... SD picture quality is great again.....</div>Well, it isn't HD, but it sure is one hell of a lot better than it has been.  :)<br><br>Now Verizon, fix the Guide data!<br><small>--<br>Justin<br>Verizon FiOS TV and Internet<br>Motorola QIP6416 HD DVR <br>Sony KDL-V40XBR1</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233230</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:27:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1568454"><b>PJL</b></A> : No issues here in Southern California.  SD picture quality is great again.  All logos are in the guide and response is great.  The first time a logo was added where it had been blank there was a slight delay moving from one channel to the next, but that's gone now.  Too bad we always have to wait until last to get updates, but when they come they seem solid.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22233166</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:06:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232990</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : WOOHOO!<br><br>The 1.6.x rollout is finally COMPLETE! HIP HIP HOORAY!<br><br>Now - on to releasing those games! LOL.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232990</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 06:31:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232946</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1051950"><b>Thespis</b></A> : Just got it in Keller.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232946</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:53:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232919</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1509282"><b>Baff</b></A> : Downloading in CA now.  Guess it must be time to start talking about 1.6.3 now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22232919</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 05:15:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22229921</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  BlackNGold29 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>[The problem I am having now is I get a blurry picture during ballgames when the guys are running around. When nobody is doing anything the picture is fine. But when a guy is moving across the screen the picture blurs up a little right around the guy. Then when he stops it's back to normal. <br> </div>What you are seeing is most likely pixelation due to insufficient bandwidth to accurately reproduce the fast motion.  However this probably is not Verizon's fault.  Are you watching the ballgames on a local station?  If you are in range and used your antenna, you would probably see the same problem.  Has your station recently added a new subchannel?  Bandwidth is shared and this would result in less available for the original channel.  If you are seeing this on an SD channel, it could be that since it is marginally sharper now that you are now able to notice it versus before when the blurriness disguised it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22229921</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:21:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22229767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kirk1233 <A HREF="/useremail/u/859462"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I have 1.6.2.  It actually made SD worse on my TV (and I barely watch any SD) and also made HD worse (which I watch a lot of.)  I would rather revert back (too bad we can't pick our own firmwares...)<br> </div>My SD picture I think is about the same. The problem I am having now is I get a blurry picture during ballgames when the guys are running around. When nobody is doing anything the picture is fine. But when a guy is moving across the screen the picture blurs up a little right around the guy. Then when he stops it's back to normal. Wasn't like this before the update. I'm still having a problem with freeze ups on FSN. Happening frequently. I've tried resetting the boxes and the router with no success. I'm going to call them and see what they can do about this. It's not my setup because my setup hasn't changed since I got this back in September and it's only been doing this the past couple of weeks that I've noticed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22229767</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:53:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228355</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/859462"><b>kirk1233</b></A> : I have 1.6.2.  It actually made SD worse on my TV (and I barely watch any SD) and also made HD worse (which I watch a lot of.)  I would rather revert back (too bad we can't pick our own firmwares...)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228355</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:42:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228225</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : I too noticed my color being noticeably "off" last night while watching this past Tuesday's episode of House. I just thought maybe it was the episode but now I'm not sure, so I'll keep an eye out as well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22228225</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:19:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/541444"><b>Raven313</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  GMFTECH <A HREF="/useremail/u/1480884"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Has anyone experienced a decreased color pallet from your STB or DVR?  <br> </div>You know what, I have been noticing the same thing recently. Yesterday watching the Masters, I noticed shots of Tiger where the image of him was totally dithered and the colors were distorted. I think it tends to show up more on darker or less lit scenes, but I could be wrong. I have the same setup attached to a Samsung HLS-6170. We should definitely keep an eye on this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22227742</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 09:53:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226328</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1480884"><b>GMFTECH</b></A> : Has anyone experienced a decreased color pallet from your STB or DVR?  I have had this happen twice since the 1.6.2 upgrade.  Both times while watching one channel while recording on another.  Once the color pallet changed from vivid (16 million?) to harsh (looked like 16 colors).  I changed channels and it stayed in the lower color pallet.  I changed to a different input and had no similar experience from the Wii.  When I changed back it was still the lower color pallet.  It cleared itself after 10 or so minutes.  Equipment information for consideration.  <br><br>Release 1.6.2<br>Build 08.58<br>Platform ID QIP-6416 P2<br>connected to a Sharp Aquos 42 inch LCD via HDMI]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22226328</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 21:59:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22224848</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185975"><b>jimboe</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  plethora87 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1608135"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Okay, dumb question -- how do you tell your code version on a 7216?<br> </div>Menu -- Settings --  System Information]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22224848</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:37:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22223387</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1608135"><b>plethora87</b></A> : Okay, dumb question -- how do you tell your code version on a 7216?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22223387</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:05:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22216485</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1555732"><b>shark2k</b></A> : They didn't "break" the mini-guide though.  That was an intentional move on their part.  You could say they screwed it up for some people, but it is not "broken."  It works exactly how they wanted it to (more than likely).<br><br>-Shark2k]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22216485</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:40:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213321</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185975"><b>jimboe</b></A> : you're dead-on with the OK button.. especially since it's already "there" for the most part..<br>Agree with B 100%]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213321</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:14:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213278</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/541444"><b>Raven313</b></A> : Here's what they should do with the mini guide:<br><br>A) Provide a user configurable setting for how many lines the mini guide will display, 1-5.<br><br>Or<br><br>B) Bring back the 3 line mini guide. Allow that to be accessed by pressing the up or down arrow. Allow the current one line mini guide to be accessed by pressing Ok to bring up the channel info, and then using the arrow buttons.<br><br>I agree that it would be nice if you could go back a couple of hours to see if you missed anything. You can do that on the guide on the FIOS tv central website, for what it's worth.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213278</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:01:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213201</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/185975"><b>jimboe</b></A> : mini-guide is really a matter of opinion.<br><br>I can see why some ppl don't like the 3-channel-at-a-time mini-guide; it takes up almost half the screen.<br><br>Me? I didn't mind it, in favor of seeing the "surrounding" channels in an "instant" glance.<br><br>One thing I wish they'd do to the guide (besides reaming the provider for being flaky at best), is allow us to surf at least one hour backwards..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213201</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:43:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213170</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/541444"><b>Raven313</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  tylert120 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1270727"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I don't like how I only see one channel on the mini guide now.<br> </div>Can't they add something without taking something else away? <br><br>They added dual buffering but broke SD PQ.<br>They fixed SD PQ but broke mini-guide.<br>Next they will fix mini-guide and break ___ ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22213170</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:35:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22212909</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1270727"><b>tylert120</b></A> : I don't like how I only see one channel on the mini guide now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22212909</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:42:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22207087</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1149928"><b>Jhuyui</b></A> : I know a lot of you guys are saying that your SD picture quality has improved, but I've seen the exact opposite.  I've got a 6416 P2 and the SD looks horrible now.  Tons of mosquito noise.  I didn't even know about the IMG upgrade.  Just noticed that it suddenly looked like crap one day and then went here to find out about the update.  Beforehand, everything was looking perfect...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22207087</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 20:49:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22205536</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1586657"><b>ItsMyLife</b></A> : SD quality improved a whole lot on my 50" plasma with 1.6.2 after the update here in Pittsburgh.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22205536</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:01:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread/SD looks better now?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22202167</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : It looks a bit better not much but Oh well. I just can't wait for the day every channel is in HD. I don't even care about watching SD IN 4:3 at least on a HD channel it would be clearer & cleaner picture]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22202167</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread/SD looks better now?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200996</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1551294"><b>majicman</b></A> : No, it's not just you.  That was something they addressed in this update (SD picture quality).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200996</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 20:27:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread/SD looks better now?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by billv7878 :</small><br><br>Is it just me or is SD a lot better with 1.6.2? We got it in Pittsburgh today. Before it SD looked so soft & blurry now it's sharper and full of color or again is that just me?<br> </div>I thought it was too when I first got the upgrade.  Either I got used to it real fast and am not as impressed as I thought I was, or it has regressed somewhat.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200105</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:39:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread/SD looks better now?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Is it just me or is SD a lot better with 1.6.2? We got it in Pittsburgh today. Before it SD looked so soft & blurry now it's sharper and full of color or again is that just me?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22200001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:17:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22198353</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1551294"><b>majicman</b></A> : My only complaint is the mini guide has been changed.  Whenever I press the down arrow, I now can only see one channel, as opposed to three.  That's annoying.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22198353</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:28:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197249</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : I woke up this morning to find the 1.6.2 upgrade had been pushed out to my part of Florida (VHO2) overnight, right on schedule.  Now, I'll just have to watch and see if I notice any difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197249</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:00:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1474562"><b>Mark F</b></A> : When I turned the TV on, there was a message that the box was in standby and to push menu to continue. Then up came a box saying we got the update and to check the message  center. After reading the 2-page message, I returned to live TV. Everything seems OK, so far.<br>Mark F.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197200</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 08:49:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197056</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ponistd <A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Hmm...I don't think I can opine on that one as my views would be biased watching an SD channel on a 60" TV. :D   <br> </div>I know what you mean.  One of our sets is a 60" Sony SXRD.  The SD improved a great deal with this release but naturally SD is not why we have this set.  While it is no longer blurry (in general) and certainly is watchable, it is by no means pristine as the SD is on our SD sets and smaller HD sets.  The SD is also very good on the front projection set since the release.  As far as HD on the Sony, however, after 3 years the PQ still amazes me!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197056</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:49:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Tang-<br>Look for my summary on Page 7 of this thread - it's fairly accurate.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21975310-162-Upgrade-Thread~start=120">1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</A><br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22197008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:19:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196989</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Does anybody have a quick run down of all of the fixes in this new img ?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196989</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:05:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196700</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><b>ponistd</b></A> : Hmm...I don't think I can opine on that one as my views would be biased watching an SD channel on a 60" TV. :D  <br><br>OT - I did think that there was something wrong with the video feed when our Steelers were able to punt the ball more than 20 net yards. ;) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196700</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:48:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196691</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ponistd <A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I'm assuming you mean NFL-HD (588)?  The picture looks okay to me.  Keep in mind that the game that they are showing is from 2003.  HD equipment has changed a lot since then...<br> </div>No, I dont have HD. Watching the SD channel. I watched this same replay earlier before the update and it wasn't doing that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196691</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:44:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196690</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><b>ponistd</b></A> : I'm assuming you mean NFL-HD (588)?  The picture looks okay to me.  Keep in mind that the game that they are showing is from 2003.  HD equipment has changed a lot since then...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196690</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:42:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196684</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ponistd <A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Same here in Pittsburgh.  All STBs are now showing Release 1.6.2, Build 8.58.  Congratulations to all.  This looks like a great release!<br> </div>If you guys are still up, could you turn on NFL Network right now. Picture is blurring up when the players are moving. Other channels look OK so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196684</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:40:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196671</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><b>ponistd</b></A> : Same here in Pittsburgh.  All STBs are now showing Release 1.6.2, Build 8.58.  Congratulations to all.  This looks like a great release!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196671</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:33:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196667</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558457"><b>Pezisgod</b></A> : update complete in tampa 1.6.2 build 8.58 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196667</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:31:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196634</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : I have the dl on my box now, as I'm typing this, so I guess I'm about to find out for myself about this latest update. I hope I'll be pleased!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196634</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:15:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196632</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/925786"><b>ponistd</b></A> : My DVR just rebooted and is downloading the update as I'm typing!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196632</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 02:14:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196268</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : Since everyone else is saying it, then I'll say it as well! Ready in the Pittsburgh area!! lol ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22196268</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 00:13:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195983</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1474562"><b>Mark F</b></A> : Ready in VHO10. I'm not sure when it will happen, most likely overnight, which could be within the next 6 or so hours. If the update does take place on the 7th.<br>Mark F.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195983</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:13:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195812</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Ready in North Port]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195812</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:45:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195572</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/899744"><b>Belspur</b></A> : I am waiting to. Lets get ready to rumble.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22195572</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:04:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22190794</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : As far as I know, yes.  Of course, schedules are meant to be changed.  I'm in VHO2 and also scheduled for 4/7.  But, we'll see.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22190794</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 08:38:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22188782</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564349"><b>BlackNGold29</b></A> : Is the next 1.6.2 update still scheduled for April 7? I am VHO11. Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22188782</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 19:53:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22184334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by dfnn :</small><br><br>So what is the truth with the new img as far as the clock goes if the box is off does the clock stay off. I sure hope so...<br> </div>There is a setting to make it stay off if you want to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22184334</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:42:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22183947</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : So what is the truth with the new img as far as the clock goes if the box is off does the clock stay off. I sure hope so...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22183947</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:05:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22183301</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : I didn't want to take the chance so I rescheduled all my series recordings.<br><br>I left three other individual shows I'd scheduled untouched, after making sure that there were repeats later.  The ones I left alone did record without a problem.<br><br>The first of the newly scheduled series failed to mark it as keep until I erased it but I'd messed around with the start and end times of that one just prior to it's recording.  The next show in the series did get marked with the shield.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22183301</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 14:28:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22182597</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : Anybody else have there DVR not record some shows after this update? The very next day ours did not record a few that were scheduled to record. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22182597</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:00:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22179210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JTBurn <A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>That might work.  Much more elegant than the piece of cardboard that I use. :) <br><br>The wife says it's too bright in the bedroom.  I tell her to close her eyes at night. She says they are closed, etc., etc.....<br> </div>Sounds like the conversation in my bedroom at night. :o She gets back up and closes the doors to the armoire. :uhh:  Me, I fall asleep.<br><br>Only 4 more days until I get 1.6.2 :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22179210</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:55:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178962</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : That might work.  Much more elegant than the piece of cardboard that I use. :) <br><br>The wife says it's too bright in the bedroom.  I tell her to close her eyes at night. She says they are closed, etc., etc.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178962</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:11:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178084</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JTBurn <A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I thought I read that with 1.6.2 there was away to dim the clock/display. I am mistaken, correct?<br> </div>There is a way to shut it off completely if the box is off in the Settings Menu. There will be a dimming setting in 1.7<br> </div>Until then, you could always try something like this on the STB's display window.<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.amazon.com/Insta-Cling-Windshield-Strip-Professional-Tint/dp/B000EBICN2" >www.amazon.com/Insta-Cling-Winds&middot;&middot;&middot;00EBICN2</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178084</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:00:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178051</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JTBurn <A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I thought I read that with 1.6.2 there was away to dim the clock/display. I am mistaken, correct?<br> </div>There is a way to shut it off completely if the box is off in the Settings Menu. There will be a dimming setting in 1.7]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22178051</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:55:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177978</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : I thought I read that with 1.6.2 there was away to dim the clock/display. I am mistaken, correct?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177978</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:45:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sashwa <A HREF="/useremail/u/299537"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You guys get 20 lashes with a wet noodle for these remarks. :p<br><br>Now back to topic, please.<br> </div>Consider usn's noodled! :D<br><br>But...  Can't we consider spousal unit HD awareness upgrades part of 1.6.2?<br><br>However, I have been doing a lot of SD VOD comparison lately and the stuff from the Starz/Encore camp (Encore seems to be the worst) still looks crummy in SD.  <br><br>I've looked at the VOD bitrates from both Encore and Cinemax SD VOD and they are identical at ~3.9 Mb/s.  Cinemax's picture quality is starkly better than Encore's.  Where you can really see it is when there is text on the screen but, in general, it looks like Encore stuff is shot with a layer of Vaseline on the lens.  <br><br>I have a sneaking suspicion it has to do with the resolution they are using to render the image.  I don't have any way of measuring that but if Cinemax VOD is using something like 704x480 and Encore VOD is using say 528x480, that would have a noticeable affect on picture sharpness (25% less info on the screen).<br><br>The other thing is, if you compare the image sharpness of WGN-SD (Ch-8), which the last time I checked on my directly connected QAM tuner is sent in 528x480, to any of the Music Choice channels (Ch-1800+), which are sent at 704x480, you can see the difference there as well - again look at any text on the screen - marked differences in detail.  Admittedly, the contrast on the MC channels is somewhat washed out but the crispness of the text is much better.<br><br>Also, check the URGE Radio channels (Ch-1900+).  They are sent in 528x480 and are fuzzy as well.<br><br>Otherwise, I have seen a noticeable improvement in SD PQ since 1.6.2<br><br>Addendum, about the clock: I never had an ongoing problem with 1.6.0 and the clock display on my 6416 and, in the few weeks since the 1.6.2 push, I still don't have it.  I switch channels and the channel shows until the next minute rolls by when it switches back to time display.  The same occurs on the 2500 SD box.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177338</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177308</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : OK, I just read the thread, looks like it was fixed with 1.6.2<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,22141208?hilite=clock">DVR/SD boxes wont keep "show clock" setting</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177308</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:16:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I'm not sure, I still see people complaining about it, but I don't know if they got the upgrade yet. Anyone with it for several weeks want to comment?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177273</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:11:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177262</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : Uh oh, does that mean that bug ISN'T fixed? I am out of town this weekend and if i return to my DVR showing me a channel number again, I might lose it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177262</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:09:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  crankerchick <A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>On topic, I'm in VHO4 and we got the update yesterday of course. Among other things (improved SD quality being one), it sure is nice to have my HD DVR go back to showing the clock like it's supposed to, instead of always reverting to the channel number despite the menu settings. <br> </div>Give it time, it's only been a day  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177244</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:08:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : On topic, I'm in VHO4 and we got the update yesterday of course. Among other things (improved SD quality being one), it sure is nice to have my HD DVR go back to showing the clock as I've told it to, instead of always reverting to the channel number despite the menu settings. Can't tell you how many times in the last few months I've thought it was 5 or 6 oclock and some change because the display was showing the hd channel # we are watching instead of the time (we leave the box on all the time).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22177206</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 13:02:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176868</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/299537"><b>sashwa</b></A> : You guys get 20 lashes with a wet noodle for these remarks. :p<br><br>Now back to topic, please.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176868</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:19:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176824</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  crankerchick <A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>wow that might be the most sexist thing i've heard in quite a while, LOL. i'll remember that when I walk into the room and catch my husband watching WWE RAW in SD because he can't tell the difference between that and the HD channel...<br><br>He rolls his eyes too when I switch the channel to an HD channel. Maybe I was duped into marrying a woman?<br> </div>ROFLMAO! :D<br><br>I's funny but when I ask my wife why she's watching stuff on SD (when there's an HD version), she rolls her eyes at me and says she doesn't care because she can't tell the difference.  Even when I switch back and forth between the SD & HD channels, quickly, she still shrugs.<br><br>I wasn't going to post about it but when crankerchick posted this, I just couldn't resist!<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176824</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:13:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : wow that might be the most sexist thing i've heard in quite a while, LOL. i'll remember that when I walk into the room and catch my husband watching WWE RAW in SD because he can't tell the difference between that and the HD channel...<br><br>He rolls his eyes too when I switch the channel to an HD channel. Maybe I was duped into marrying a woman?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22176686</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 11:49:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175983</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><b>Vamp9190</b></A> : <small><div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Yeah they dont bother me because I dont watch sd channels but I cant get my wife to watch the HD channels. I walk in the room and cringe. I grab the remote and switch to the hd channels and she rolls her eyes.<br> </div></small><br><br>Ha! Same here too. You would think that females would notice a better/worse picture same as men, but for some strange reason they (not all of course, but you get the idea) do not seem as attuned to it. Maybe because it is 'HT / Tech' related and they are typically not the least bit interested in that.<br><br>What if we start saying a catchy phrase like: "See more on 504" , would that sink in and get them up in the HD channels?  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175983</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:52:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175949</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><b>Vamp9190</b></A> : <small><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I must admit also that the SD channels did look good when I had Comcast. Now, the differences are not that noticeable.<br> </div></small><br><br>Really? Huh, I had Comcast alongside of Fios back in the fall of 2007-start of 08 (for NBA LP) and the SD on CC was horrible (this was on a fresh install, new coax runs & everything). The CC installer was really impressed with VZ SD picture quality. That was before the 1.6.0 IMG, so yes I noticed the sub-par change too.<br><br>Now with 1.6.2 I am happier, not necessarily blown away, but I flipped through a variety of SD channels last night and did notice improvement. I need to watch FSC this weekend and see if it is better, that was one of the worst IMO.<br><br>I think this was already talked about a lot, but I also noticed that 'lag' when you are using the arrows to go up and down in the program guide (channel by channel, not pg up/down). That is annoying when it seemed fine before, at least I did not notice it like I do now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175949</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 09:44:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175657</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Yes, I believe if you have it OFF, it will output SD to whatever you have the box set for HD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175657</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:20:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175650</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  StevenJB <A HREF="/useremail/u/1516746"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br> I keep the SD override set to "OFF" on both STBs.  That allows my Sony TV's to upconvert the 480i SD channels to 1080i compatibility because I am using HDMI connections.  <br> </div>If you have it to OFF, isn't the STB doing the upconverting, not the TV?<br> </div>This is what I found, but I don't understand what "off" does, exactly.<br><br>&#8226;480i - passes the SD signal straight through<br>&#8226;480p - upconverts 480p<br>&#8226;stretch - stretches the picture to widescreen 16:9<br>&#8226;off - upconverts the SD signal to your TV setting<br><br>On one of my TV's with a native resolution of 720p, if I select 480i my TV displays in 480i and it looks terrible.  If I leave the setting to "off", my TV is at the native resolution of 720p and the image, especially text, looks much clearer.  Each TV is going to give you different results, hence the available choices.<br><br>Not sure if "off" is being upconverted by the STB or my TV.  If it is done by the STB, how does it know what to upconvert the signal to?  Is it using my settings from the system menu?  If I select 1080i for HD on the STB, is that how my SD channels will display if I have the SD override set to off?  I have not tested this, but this seems to make sense.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175650</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:18:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175418</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  StevenJB <A HREF="/useremail/u/1516746"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> I keep the SD override set to "OFF" on both STBs.  That allows my Sony TV's to upconvert the 480i SD channels to 1080i compatibility because I am using HDMI connections.  <br> </div>If you have it to OFF, isn't the STB doing the upconverting, not the TV?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175418</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:45:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175414</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  negeland <A HREF="/useremail/u/1596348"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> We frequently watch the C-Span channels, no SD available, so this is important to both of us.<br> </div>I guess you meant no HD available on C-SPAN, not SD, but I just read that they do plan on making all 3 of their channels HD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22175414</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 05:44:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22174739</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1596348"><b>negeland</b></A> : I am now watching the History Channel SD here in MD after the 1.6.2 upgrade. PQ is very good, much better than with 1.6.0 and seems as good as it was when I had Comcast last year.  Since VZ has History in HD, I checked it out also.  It has great PQ but the picture is obviously stretched rather than being true HD. The SD channel is better to watch.  I have also compared a number of the SD channels on both my VZ 6416 DVR to my TiVo HD and there seems to be very little difference now compared to much better PQ on the TiVo before the upgrade. I am very pleased with the upgrade since my wife was never comfortable with the TiVo remote interface (I love it) and her viewing experience is much improved. We frequently watch the C-Span channels, no SD available, so this is important to both of us.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22174739</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:45:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22174674</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1516746"><b>StevenJB</b></A> : I have two QIP6416-2 STBs.  On both Sony HDTVs (50" and 70"), the IMG 1.6.2 update has definitely returned my SD PQ to the way that it originally was last year.  Some channels are better than others, as expected.  That will depend on the particular channel and its source programming.  Some of the SD channels are still a little bit out of focus but not nearly as bad as they were before with 1.6.0.  Those channels include most notably the URGE music channels.  But, their PQ is greatly improved now compared to how bad it was before.  On the other end of the PQ spectrum, the SD premium movie channel(s) PQ is almost but not quite the equal to their HD counterpart(s) and the HD channels are absolutely stunning in their PQ clarity and sharpness.  The SD premium movie channels PQ is almost that good now.  I keep the SD override set to "OFF" on both STBs.  That allows my Sony TV's to upconvert the 480i SD channels to 1080i compatibility because I am using HDMI connections.  I am a very happy camper now with the excellent SD PQ.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22174674</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 23:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172728</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/212061"><b>gmartine</b></A> : I don't see a big difference on the quality of the SD signa.  I have a QIP-6416 but it will be replace by a 7 series this week.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172728</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:39:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172482</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Did you have a 6 or 7 series HD DVR?  You will not see any difference if  you had a 7 series DVR. Problems only affected the QIP 6412 series DVR.<br></div>I'm in VA, so I guess I got the update today..<br>did this problem also affect the QIP 6xxx Non-DVR?<br><br>This is the only HD-STB I watch SD on... smaller TV in bedroom.<br>I have the above DVR connected to a 50", and don't watch SD on that one..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172482</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:48:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172386</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Well, now you have your answer. No change for 7 series DVR users.<br> </div>If this looks good to most people I cant even imagine how bad it must have looked before this for users of 6 series.<br> </div>It was like watching TV without your glasses on (assuming you had to wear glasses).  Grossly blurred and unacceptable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172386</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:30:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172285</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I must admit also that the SD channels did look good when I had Comcast. Now, the differences are not that noticeable.<br> </div>Yeah they dont bother me because I dont watch sd channels but I cant get my wife to watch the HD channels. I walk in the room and cringe. I grab the remote and switch to the hd channels and she rolls her eyes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172285</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:09:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172278</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Well, now you have your answer. No change for 7 series DVR users.<br> </div>If this looks good to most people I cant even imagine how bad it must have looked before this for users of 6 series.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172278</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:07:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>I get a finders fee for referrals to my Opthamologist. :D<br> </div>Even my wife said SD channels looked better when we had comcast. HD channels on the other hand look much better than comcast ever did but the SD channels suck pretty bad.<br> </div>I must admit also that the SD channels did look good when I had Comcast. Now, the differences are not that noticeable.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172273</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:07:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172258</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>Did you have a 6 or 7 series HD DVR?  You will not see any difference if  you had a 7 series DVR. Problems only affected the QIP 6412 series DVR.<br> </div>7 series<br> </div>Well, now you have your answer. No change for 7 series DVR users.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172258</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:05:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172255</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>I get a finders fee for referrals to my Opthamologist. :D<br> </div>Even my wife said SD channels looked better when we had comcast. HD channels on the other hand look much better than comcast ever did but the SD channels suck pretty bad.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172255</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:04:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172244</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>Did you have a 6 or 7 series HD DVR?  You will not see any difference if  you had a 7 series DVR. Problems only affected the QIP 6412 series DVR.<br> </div>7 series]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172244</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:03:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172233</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : Also, SD channels look alot better on an SD TV versus and HD TV.  There are numerous thread here explaining why this is so.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172233</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:01:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172224</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>I get a finders fee for referrals to my Opthamologist. :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172224</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:59:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.<br> </div>Did you have a 6 or 7 series HD DVR?  You will not see any difference if  you had a 7 series DVR. Problems only affected the QIP 6412 series DVR.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172221</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:59:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172199</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : I havent found any SD channels yet that I think looks good. Actually I dont see any difference at all after this 1.6.2 upgrade.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172199</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:54:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172161</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : Very happy with the release of IMG 1.6.2 in Maryland today.<br><br>Now, the SD channels look like the way they should.<br><br>As another poster pointed out earlier, some SD channels look alot better than others and I "hope" it is a source issue versus what Directv did when I was a previous subscriber.  I think it is well known that Directv allocates more  bandwidth to some SD channels than others thus resulting in some SD channels looking great and others awful]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22172161</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:46:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170956</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  danclan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>OK maybe ive been asleep but i notice now with this latest update that there is standby video message....why? doesnt that require MORE power in standby mode?<br> </div>All they did was keep the video drivers enabled and put that bouncing message on there.  If it resulted in more than a few milliwatts of increased standby power, I'd be very surprised.<br><br>But, yes, the boxes probably do draw a scoche more stdby power now.<br><br>The message is there to let you know that the TV is on but the box is in standby.  Probably to help out with the loss of sync problem for those who have the power button set to activate both with a single press.  It lets you power up the STB by hitting the menu button, getting the TV and STB back in sync without having to turn the TV off and on in a short period of time - not very good for CRT type sets.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170956</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:21:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170933</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : I believe the STBs always outputted an image when off, it was just black before.  At least my TVs would indicate they had a video signal even when the STB was turned off.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170933</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:17:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170160</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><b>danclan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  danclan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>OK maybe ive been asleep but i notice now with this latest update that there is standby video message....why? doesnt that require MORE power in standby mode?<br> </div>I'll shoot you over a penny.<br> </div>while i would normally agree...however take that and multiply it out over the millions of devices rolled out...in this day and age of watt counting I think they need to take that into account. The fewer devices i have micro sipping the better, if this message was added with zero net growth it watt usage then great otherwise i can do just fine with out it as can pretty much everyone else.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22170160</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:56:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169878</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450147"><b>bcushman</b></A> : "Kes, I think with this upgrade, it leaves the box in the state it was in. If you had it off, it will be off, it you had it on, it will stay on, but I'm not positive. If you get home and they are all on and you got the update, then we know this is true."<br><br>Yes, this time my two HD DVRs were both on after I got the update last week. <br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169878</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:54:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169817</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  danclan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>OK maybe ive been asleep but i notice now with this latest update that there is standby video message....why? doesnt that require MORE power in standby mode?<br> </div>I'll shoot you over a penny.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169817</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:37:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169752</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : Here in Northern Virginia (VHO4), I awoke this morning at 2:30 AM to a "click" coming from the STB.  While I was still a bit cloudy-headed with sleep, it came back to me that the update probably just occurred.  To satisfy my curiosity, I turned on the TV, which was still on Comedy Central after watching the "news", and I was rather impressed with what I saw on the screen.  I've heard people talk about how much better the SD picture quality was before, but wow!<br><br>Not every SD show is pristine, but they are all noticeably improved, and many of them look exceptional on my HD TV's.  <br><br>One thing to note is that I was not able to access the guide or menu of the STB until I powered it off and back on again with the remote. The on-screen message had me select "Menu" after powering on before everything started working correctly.  This was with a 6416 unit.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169752</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:17:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169732</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><b>danclan</b></A> : OK maybe ive been asleep but i notice now with this latest update that there is standby video message....why? doesnt that require MORE power in standby mode?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169732</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 08:11:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169676</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312977"><b>Bill Odom</b></A> : I leave mine on, also.  I noticed this morning that they were still on and were still displaying the time.<br>There's a new message titled Media Guide Updates which--interestingly--has a typo in the last line (....can still be found by pressing the "Widgets" button your remote control.)  :D<br>The channel logos look good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169676</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:40:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169671</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1609346"><b>Xanthos</b></A> : Got it early am in Arlington VA.<br><br>WOW! I had forgotten how good SD could look from my HD STB's. <br><br>They "broke" the SD picture quality with the 1.6.0 push  in our VHO on August 28, 2008. It is just hard to believe, and totally unacceptable, that it took Vz over 7 months to rectify this issue. In addition,it was over a month or so after they did it before they would admit that there was any problem.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169671</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:37:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169665</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  kes601 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nothing for VHO9.<br><br>Edit:  I am assuming we did not get it because none of my boxes were off this morning, I always leave them on.  All updates in the past have left my boxes in the off state.  If we got it it a) did not wake me up and b) did not leave my boxes off.  Was running late so did not turn the tv on.<br> </div>Kes, I think with this upgrade, it leaves the box in the state it was in. If you had it off, it will be off, it you had it on, it will stay on, but I'm not positive. If you get home and they are all on and you got the update, then we know this is true.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169665</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : Ahh, ok.  I probably did get it then.  I don't think it would have woken me up at that time.  We usually get them around 5:00.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:28:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169646</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I am in Richmond, VH09 and I got it at 2:30 am.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169646</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:26:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169598</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : Nothing for VHO9.<br><br>Edit:  I am assuming we did not get it because none of my boxes were off this morning, I always leave them on.  All updates in the past have left my boxes in the off state.  If we got it it a) did not wake me up and b) did not leave my boxes off.  Was running late so did not turn the tv on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169598</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:00:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169574</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Good to hear!<br><br>3 more VHO's out of the way..<br><br>5 left..<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169574</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:43:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><b>mccla21</b></A> : Yep same here in MD for me<br>got the upgrade to 1.6.2]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169558</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 06:27:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/761749"><b>Vamp</b></A> : I just got 1.6.2 / 8.58 here in MD.<br> ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22169332</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:48:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167456</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jmn1207 <A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I know they have refrigerators with TV's built into them, but I think the microwaves would cause all kinds of internal havoc with a TV/microwave oven combo. :D<br><br>I suppose that I should have said I would heat a bag of popcorn in the microwave and then go sit in front of my TV and wait for the update. It's all in the details. :)<br> </div>Yes sometimes something as simple as a comma...... :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167456</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:48:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167434</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : I know they have refrigerators with TV's built into them, but I think the microwaves would cause all kinds of internal havoc with a TV/microwave oven combo. :D<br><br>I suppose that I should have said I would heat a bag of popcorn in the microwave and then go sit in front of my TV and wait for the update. It's all in the details. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167434</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:45:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167385</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jmn1207 <A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I am so excited.  Just before midnight I'm gonna throw a bag of popcorn in the microwave and sit and stare at the system information screen until the update starts.  ;)<br> </div>Your microwave can receive updates while it just sits there?  Does it update the Magnetron power, noise level or does the beep, beep beep sound become enhanced as a result of these updates? ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167385</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:36:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167355</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : I am so excited.  Just before midnight I'm gonna throw a bag of popcorn in the microwave and sit and stare at the system information screen until the update starts.  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22167355</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:32:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163596</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : matcarl said it was delayed until 4/2 which is tomorrow.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163596</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:48:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/212061"><b>gmartine</b></A> : I live in Reston, VA.  No updates here so far :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163510</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:33:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163509</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><b>Vamp9190</b></A> : You can also try www.Zap2it.com and put in your zipcode. It should show you Fios and the other providers in the area.<br><br>You can look at the program guide and search by keyword, plus highlight categories like 'Sports' in different colors.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22163509</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:33:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : She's been a St. Pete Times subscriber for years.  Their printed guide has BH and Comcrap.  Not even Knology - at least not the edition we get, maybe in Pinellas.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158905</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:24:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158834</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1509822"><b>ramslt8</b></A> : "TV Guide published in our Sunday newspaper "<br><br>The one in the Tampa Tribune had been updated with the Fios channels last time I looked. Not sure about the St.Pete Times.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158834</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:11:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158706</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : Yeah, I realized that the day I was re-programming the Favorites.  My lightbulb went on.  I have trouble remembering the exceptions like Spike, 54.  I keep wanting to go to 554.<br><br>Then, I'll come in the room and realize my wife has tuned to channel 50 when it should be 550.  We're gettin' there, slowly. ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158706</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:47:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158609</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Gary A <A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Vamp9190 <A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>My wife will be watching SD channels and then I remind her to tune to the HD ones on 504 & above. </div>My wife and I are still trying to get our brains wrapped around the different channel numbers for HD.   </div>Gary-<br><br>Good rule of thumb is +500 for the HD's (though this doesn't apply 100% of the time)<br><br>Instance:<br><br>50 USA<br>550 USA HD<br><br>86 MLB<br>586 MLB HD<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158609</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:30:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158592</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Vamp9190 <A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>My wife will be watching SD channels and then I remind her to tune to the HD ones on 504 & above. </div>My wife and I are still trying to get our brains wrapped around the different channel numbers for HD.  Its confusing because some of the channels we watch are still available only in SD (AMC, Spike) and are in the low channel number range.<br><br>I use the Favorites on-screen guide where I programmed in all the correct HD & SD channels and she reads the TV Guide published in our Sunday newspaper which only lists a small sub-set of the channels we get and only has the channel numbers listed for the local cable companies, not any FiOS TV channels.  Can't break her of that habit. :huh: Drives me nuts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158592</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:26:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Today's update has been delayed until 4/2<br> </div>Thanks for the update update. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22158043</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:56:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157977</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : That is strange. I wonder the reason. Someone must have called out sick.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157977</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:46:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157879</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Today's update has been delayed until 4/2]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157879</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:29:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157314</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : still waiting here in MD as well..no update as of now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157314</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:35:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157298</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/582815"><b>Vamp9190</b></A> : Cool. Now I am going to check when I get home this afternoon. I totally forgot about the date and that the update is happening.<br><br>My wife will be watching SD channels and then I remind her to tune to the HD ones on 504 & above. To be fair some of her shows are on MTV, etc. so there is no choice. Hopefully this will make everything more enjoyable.<br><br>Good to know about VOD....some of the SD movies look incredibly bad....I am excited to see improvement there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157298</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:31:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157246</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  HenryFarpolo <A HREF="/useremail/u/867576"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>The SD programs will almost look like HD but just shy of looking as clear and lifelike.<br>I used to find the SD channels unwatchable since they had blurred them, now they are fine.<br> </div>I found the same thing when we got the update last week. I forgot just how good the FIOS SD quality can be. I am now watching SD programming again.<br> </div>Same here - no more watering eyes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157246</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1340280"><b>rayjc1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  HenryFarpolo <A HREF="/useremail/u/867576"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>The SD programs will almost look like HD but just shy of looking as clear and lifelike.<br>I used to find the SD channels unwatchable since they had blurred them, now they are fine.<br> </div>I found the same thing when we got the update last week. I forgot just how good the FIOS SD quality can be. I am now watching SD programming again.<br> </div>   Must be nice. We were supposed to get 1.6.2 last night in MD, but no joy, still on 1.6.0. What do we outsiders have to do to get in? It's certainly not that we're paying less, so should have to wait longer ... I've been looking forward to no "Unable to Locate Hub" for six months, thought we'd be there now but nope, the Grinch strikes again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157242</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:19:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I have to say even the VOD looks better.<br> </div>True and those shows that had been recorded on the DVR look clearer so it must have been how the video was rendered to the screen that was blurred.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157217</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:14:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157165</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : I have to say even the VOD looks better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157165</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:02:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157041</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/867576"><b>HenryFarpolo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The SD programs will almost look like HD but just shy of looking as clear and lifelike.<br>I used to find the SD channels unwatchable since they had blurred them, now they are fine.<br> </div>I found the same thing when we got the update last week. I forgot just how good the FIOS SD quality can be. I am now watching SD programming again.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157041</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:28:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157029</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : Man that sounds great. I can't wait for good SD!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157029</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:25:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157008</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : The SD programs will almost look like HD but just shy of looking as clear and lifelike.<br>I used to find the SD channels unwatchable since they had blurred them, now they are fine.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22157008</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:19:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156971</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/173687"><b>jmn1207</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mccla21 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I never got the upgrade overnight. I live in MD and am on VOH 4<br><br>I am till at 1.6.0<br> </div>I checked this morning and I was still at 1.6.0 as well.  I'm sure it will happen sometime today.  Not ever having any other version to compare it to, I have no major issues, aside from the annoyances with the delayed remote control inputs, but I don't think those were corrected anyway.  SD picture quality has always looked much better than it ever did with Comcast on my HD TV's, and I have 6416 boxes.  I am curious to see how much of an improvement the new version will make; although, at the most, I typically only watch about 2-3 hours of SD TV channels each week.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156971</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:10:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156937</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : Well I will assume I didnt get mine here in germantown either. Well that sucks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156937</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:00:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156840</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452846"><b>kes601</b></A> : Same here, nothing out of VHO9 either.  Still at 1.6.0.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156840</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:02:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156828</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><b>mccla21</b></A> : I never got the upgrade overnight. I live in MD and am on VOH 4<br><br>I am till at 1.6.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22156828</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:53:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22155321</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/856116"><b>Redshirt 24</b></A> : Hmm.  I'm guessing Plano (TX) will get this at the same time as Carrollton: April 14.  Damn, I'll be home when this happens...need to remember to rent a movie or something...<br><small>--<br><i>The Young and the Restless</i>: cheaper than having your own life.</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22155321</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:23:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22155023</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  navyblue99ss <A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Mine is scheduled for tomorrow. Will it do it right after midnight tonight?<br> </div>Mine didn't do it till 3:20 AM.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22155023</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:33:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22154208</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Yes as soon as it hits 12am it will send you a message about the box rebooting on its own.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22154208</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:56:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22154112</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1410253"><b>navyblue99ss</b></A> : Mine is scheduled for tomorrow. Will it do it right after midnight tonight?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22154112</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:41:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138476</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/408205"><b>Phil</b></A> : OK, thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138476</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:45:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138472</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Phil <A HREF="/useremail/u/408205"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Any ETA for California?<br> </div>4/14]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138472</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:44:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138449</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/408205"><b>Phil</b></A> : Any ETA for California?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22138449</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:41:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22137211</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Yes, matcarl is correct, you can still power it off, thus the combo off button on the remote should still work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22137211</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:56:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22137005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>but I am constantly getting the TV to shut off but the box is not.<br> </div>That's because now the STB is never off. It's either on, or in "standby".<br> </div>It still shuts off when you hit power like it used to. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22137005</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:12:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136985</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>but I am constantly getting the TV to shut off but the box is not.<br> </div>That's because now the STB is never off. It's either on, or in "standby".<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136985</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:07:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136975</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : That's why they put the message there, to let you know the TV is on but the box is off and out of sync. Maybe you need to reprogram your remote if they aren't both shutting off anymore.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136975</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:05:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : I have to agree with that. My power button seems now also to be out of sync. I thought it was just me....but I am constantly getting the TV to shut off but the box is not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136970</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:04:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136949</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Yes but it seems like the power on button on my remote has stopped turning on both devices. I know they sometimes get out of sync but this is happening every time now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136949</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:58:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136922</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : There is no way to turn it off. You can either hit Power or Menu to turn on the STB, it's just a reminder that your TV is on, but the STB is off.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136922</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:49:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136896</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : It seems since the upgrade every time I turn on my TV I get a FIOS screen telling me I have to hit the menu key if I want to watch TV? Anyone know why it is doing that and how to stop it?<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136896</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:43:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136818</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/896908"><b>JTBurn</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  LLL1424 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1117191"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Also, I always hear people talk about the SD quality but right now mines is superb. People always acknowledge the amazaing quality picture I have...( I do have the 7216) and I wonder how the new upgrade will affect quality. Hmmmm.<br> </div>The upgrade probably won't impact your SD pq much since it is superb.  Mine, on the other hand, without the 7216, is crap. So I'm hopeful.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136818</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 08:17:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  LLL1424 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1117191"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I haven't got the upgrade yet but I'm excited for it. I'm in the DC area. Maryland to be exact. When is the release date for this area?<br> </div>Next Tuesday (3/31)<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136638</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:58:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136617</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1117191"><b>LLL1424</b></A> : <br>I haven't got the upgrade yet but I'm excited for it. I'm in the DC area. Maryland to be exact. When is the release date for this area?<br><br>Also, I always hear people talk about the SD quality but right now mines is superb. People always acknowledge the amazaing quality picture I have...( I do have the 7216) and I wonder how the new upgrade will affect quality. Hmmmm.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136617</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:37:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136336</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ramslt8 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1509822"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>To me this sounds like a MOCA issue. You need to check the diagnostics and verify MOCA speeds between the stb's and the router. Anything less than 180 and you will have problems streaming HD content between boxes.(should really be over 200)<br> </div>I assume you mean the values in pg 4 of "Connected Home Link Status", in the hidden menu on the STBs. The Values range from 233-240, so I'm good there.<br><br>Besides, this ONLY occurs on HistHD, (that I've encountered).<br><br>(Sorry Matt, I didn't see that you edited to update your post above..)<br><br>What else could the problem be?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22136336</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:31:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135911</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Nvm i just notice on the Big screen TVs the SD is poor but on my 19 inch is crisp cause i guess the smaller the better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135911</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:19:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135890</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1509822"><b>ramslt8</b></A> : To me this sounds like a MOCA issue. You need to check the diagnostics and verify MOCA speeds between the stb's and the router. Anything less than 180 and you will have problems streaming HD content between boxes.(should really be over 200)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135890</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:15:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135530</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Jaydee-<br><br>Read my prior post - I did test this - with no issues...<br><br>So, it could be isolated to just you<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135530</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:56:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135372</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  stevec325 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Did you report this in the Direct Forum?<br><br>At least one other poster has tried to duplicate what you are seeing and it works fine.<br> </div>Really? I didn't see anyone respond saying they couldn't duplicate it.. Only a response from  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> saying he would <i>try</i> it and respond back.<br><br>And there we are.<br><br>That is after all, the underlying reason I posted- to see if I am alone.<br><br>BTW, I wouldn't imagine this is isolated to me. I have several 7100's and none can play back HistHD recorded content without these constant hiccups. And, all other functions of our setup here work fine (or at least as well as anyone else's here), PLUS we've had all the same problems on this equipment as everyone else here, which were resolved by 162..<br><br>..so we seem to be in "lock-step" with the community at large as far as (dis)functionality goes, if you get my drift.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22135372</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:26:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22134957</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : Did you report this in the Direct Forum?<br><br>At least one other poster has tried to duplicate what you are seeing and it works fine.<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22134957</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:04:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22134299</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jazzmess <A HREF="/useremail/u/1443209"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by Jaydee  :</small><br><br>..<br>Go record something from HistHD on your 7216-1, and try, <b>just TRY,</b> to play it back on any of your 7100-1 boxes.<br>..<br>Sheesh these should be A #1 Priority.</div>Could you tell me what the specific problem is?<br></div>On the remote STB, the program plays back like a person with Turret's Syndrome- Audio AND Video, every second theres a complete 1/10th second halt; playyyyyyy-stop!-playyyyyyy-stop!-playyyyyyy.<br><br>I'm surprised no one else has commented in this (maybe I missed it). Maybe no one really records/watches HistHD on remote STB's (7216 -> 7100).<br><br>It is COMPLETELY useless/unwatchable. There honestly is no valid excuse for something like this to get out of the lab the way it is.<br><br>Likewise, there was no excuse for it to get out of the lab before with the Fox Networks, et. al. "video freeze" problem (fyi: this one only occurred on the DVR itself). That one was almost as unbearable, but since the audio didn't constantly hiccup with the video, one <i>could</i> look down every couple of minutes or so to break up the frustration.<br><br>Still, that effected more networks, and was even more pathetic that it was released as was.<br><br>This issue also existed then, and I *assumed* it would be addressed at the same time.Much to my shock, it was not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22134299</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:03:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22133164</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1568329"><b>nickyboy4</b></A> : I agree, much clearer.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22133164</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:44:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132855</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>...<br><br>what happened to the sliding bar that lets us adjust how we want the sd pq to look.<br> </div>I believe this (slider) is being worked on for a later major release (1.7.0 or something like that).  Right now the "minor" (and I use the term loosely) to 1.6.2 finally returned the SD PQ on the 6xxx series to pre 1.5 (the old IPG for those that remember).  What do you have your SD override set to?  Try OFF or 480i and see if that makes any difference.<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132855</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:56:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1517020"><b>Max1</b></A> : After a couple of days of playing around with the functions of the 6200 HD box after the 1.6.2 upgrade, I'd like to share my views on it:<br>1)Improved SD picture quality - When I first got Fios about 2 1/2 years ago, Verizon was boasting their SD pic quality was DVD-like, while that may be true on an SD TV set, it was obviously not true on an HD set, but better than the cable operator in my area.  Since the SD pic quality was, shall we say "softened", so long ago, I've forgotten how it was prior to 1.6.  Having said that,  I do think it has improved with 1.6.2, albeit slightly.  I find the SD picture now brighter and a bit more sharper, although some channels still look like crap, probably not Verizon's fault.<br>I was expecting the DVD-like quality.<br>2) Improved Remote control responsiveness - This is self explanatory.  I've only had to single click on my remote for it to act out the commands, so that's a good thing.<br>3) Changes to guide, mini-guide, and info bar - The guide itself seems quicker when scrolling.  The mini-guide has been reduced to 1 channel.  The info bar no longer displays when choosing a channel from the guide.  This doesn't bother me much.  When I initially turned the STB on for the first time after the update, I saw the info bar channel lag that others had reported for about the first 30 min. that I was channel surfing, but I have not seen it since.  I put it to the test by speed channel surfing last night, and when I would stop at a channel the channel and description was spot on. <br><br>Due to the fact that Verizon runs their business like the CIA, and they don't actually publish a list of fixes and I don't have a DVR, I really don't know what else to look for.<br><br>If I missed a fix or an improvement that I should look at, let me know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132108</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:52:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1443209"><b>jazzmess</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  pestep <A HREF="/useremail/u/1062477"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jazzmess <A HREF="/useremail/u/1443209"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I got tons of calls about 'currently unavailable' (which this roll out fixes for the most part, and the next roll out will fix completely), and plenty about the HDMI handshake issue (although those are almost <u>entirely</u> Samsung TVs.  Honestly, with all those calls, and with my own personal bad experience w/ Samsung DVD players, I plan to never buy a Samsung product again.)<br> </div>Lest we point the finger at Samsung, I'll chime in that I've had the HDMI handshake issue with my HP DLP set.  I'm quicker to point my finger at Motorola/Verizon, as none of my other HDMI devices exhibit this problem with any of my sets.  I have 2 Samsung DLPs, and 1 HP DLP, connected to a multitude of HD devices via HDMI.  Again, the only problem I have is with the FIOS TV equipment.<br> </div>Yes, but I'm talking about scale here... I've recieved hundreds, maybe thousands of calls about issues with people using Samsung TVs.  I've maybe received 10 calls about other brands. Also, Samsungs have issues not just with 'Verizon equipment' but with all Motorola STBs.  Furthermore, I personally know people who have had issues between Samsungs and other devices (certain blueray DVD players, for example).  I'm not saying Verizon/Motorola is completely blameless in this, but I don't think Samsung is, either. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22132021</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:34:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22131272</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1533930"><b>Gary A</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>comedy central and spike.<br> </div>I vote for Spike HD :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22131272</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:09:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22130457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The HDMI handshake issue <i>STILL</i> exists.  Yay! /sarcasm]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22130457</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:28:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : I have noticed one small glitch in the giddy-up of 1.6.2 with the 6416 in that when watching a recording and using the skip ahead button some times instead of skipping ahead the DVR goes into slow motion FF. Interesting!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129987</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:44:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129857</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1501603"><b>ENFiOS</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jesus, is it me or is the sd even worse now,like comedy central and a few others look horrid. <br><br>I will redo all the settings becuase maybe the old setting i used for the blurriness are making the new 1.62 look worse then before.<br><br>what happened to the sliding bar that lets us adjust how we want the sd pq to look.<br> </div>Personally, I didn't see much change w/ 1.62 on my 50" Sony and 6xxx series DVR.  The DVR bugs seem to be gone, but I can't say the SD pic is better... or should I say it's still pretty bad.  Don't watch much in SD, but when I do . . .I'd swear it was better last year - prior to 1.60.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129857</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:19:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>maybe this is the best the sd channels can look on a 55 inch bravia lcd. I made some adjustments and its watchable, the bluriness really messed with my eyes and maybe i need time to adjust, i looked on my 42 inch lcd and its alot  better, i guess the bigger the tv  the worst it will look, i just need 2 more channels to switch to hd and ill never watch sd again.<br><br>comedy central and spike.<br> </div>Yeah when the pixels are bigger than your hand (55 inch)you can't help but notice the quality.<br>I have a 13 inch set in my garage and everything looks good on it....lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129830</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:13:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129760</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><b>NastyGrouch</b></A> : maybe this is the best the sd channels can look on a 55 inch bravia lcd. I made some adjustments and its watchable, the bluriness really messed with my eyes and maybe i need time to adjust, i looked on my 42 inch lcd and its alot  better, i guess the bigger the tv  the worst it will look, i just need 2 more channels to switch to hd and ill never watch sd again.<br><br>comedy central and spike.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129760</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:58:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129710</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jesus, is it me or is the sd even worse now,like comedy central and a few others look horrid. <br><br>I will redo all the settings becuase maybe the old setting i used for the blurriness are making the new 1.62 look worse then before.<br> </div>Must be you :)<br>I commented to my wife that I can't believe how much clearer the SD channels are now.  They used to look like you needed glasses and they were downright blurred.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129710</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:49:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129650</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><b>NastyGrouch</b></A> : Jesus, is it me or is the sd even worse now,like comedy central and a few others look horrid. <br><br>I will redo all the settings becuase maybe the old setting i used for the blurriness are making the new 1.62 look worse then before.<br><br>what happened to the sliding bar that lets us adjust how we want the sd pq to look.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129650</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:40:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129439</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : VHO01   Carrollton, TX<br>VHO02   Temple Terrace, FL<br>VHO03   Pomona, CA<br>VHO04   Silver Spring, MD<br>VHO05   Queens, NY<br>VHO06   Burlington, MA<br>VHO06a Rhode Island<br>VHO07   Freehold, NJ<br>VHO08   Philadelphia, PA<br>VHO09   Richmond, VA<br>VHO09a Norfolk, VA<br>VHO10   Fort Wayne, IN<br>VHO11   Pittsburgh, PA<br>VHO12   Portland, OR<br>VHO13   Seattle, WA<br>VHO14   Harrisburg, PA<br>VHO15   Buffalo, NY<br><br> <br><br>VHO14   VHO15                   1.6.2  26 FEB 2009<br>VHO07   VHO08                   1.6.2  10 MAR 2009<br>VHO12   VHO13                   1.6.2  17 MAR 2009<br>VHO05   VHO06  VHO06a  1.6.2  24 MAR 2009<br>VHO04   VHO09  VHO09a  1.6.2  31 MAR 2009<br>VHO02   VHO10  VHO11    1.6.2  07 APR 2009<br>VHO01   VHO03                   1.6.2  14 APR 2009]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22129439</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:03:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22128924</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1062477"><b>pestep</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jazzmess <A HREF="/useremail/u/1443209"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I got tons of calls about 'currently unavailable' (which this roll out fixes for the most part, and the next roll out will fix completely), and plenty about the HDMI handshake issue (although those are almost <u>entirely</u> Samsung TVs.  Honestly, with all those calls, and with my own personal bad experience w/ Samsung DVD players, I plan to never buy a Samsung product again.)<br> </div>Lest we point the finger at Samsung, I'll chime in that I've had the HDMI handshake issue with my HP DLP set.  I'm quicker to point my finger at Motorola/Verizon, as none of my other HDMI devices exhibit this problem with any of my sets.  I have 2 Samsung DLPs, and 1 HP DLP, connected to a multitude of HD devices via HDMI.  Again, the only problem I have is with the FIOS TV equipment.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22128924</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:34:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22128596</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1443209"><b>jazzmess</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Jaydee :</small><br><br>I really can't believe they CANNOT get this POS right.<br><br>Go record something from HistHD on your 7216-1, and try, <b>just TRY,</b> to play it back on any of your 7100-1 boxes.<br><br><u>Go ahead, I dare you.</u><br><br>How f'n long are customers expected to PAY to be BETA testers?! It's ridiculous already.<br><br>Screw the guide, Screw the "responsiveness" of the remote, Screw the Currently Unavailable, <u>Screw all of it!</u><br><br>If they CAN'T get the HM-DVR's most *CORE* functions working 100%, it's only a "Partial" HM-DVR. Why bother with bells and whistles?<br><br>Sheesh these should be A #1 Priority.</div>Could you tell me what the specific problem is?<br><br>I've got to say, while I understand 100% people's frustration w/ TV service not working just how you want it to, you have to understand that some of these issues you reference, we may never even hear about in tech support.  I got tons of calls about 'currently unavailable' (which this roll out fixes for the most part, and the next roll out will fix completely), and plenty about the HDMI handshake issue (although those are almost <u>entirely</u> Samsung TVs.  Honestly, with all those calls, and with my own personal bad experience w/ Samsung DVD players, I plan to never buy a Samsung product again.), but there have been no repeat call issues with home media DVR that I have noticed, nothing like on the scale of other issues.   There will be isolated customers that have issues, but usually sending out a new router or having a field tech go out and check the wiring usually fixes those.  So when you say "This should be top priority!", I think you're not understanding the business end of things very well.  Verizon is a business, and they will address the things that are costing the most money first.  Then they'll address the other things.  Not saying it's good, right, or even acceptable; just mentioning its the way of the world.  But hey, as the person who has to take these calls, I'm just happy they're being addressed at all. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22128596</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22125125</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1602994"><b>hernanu</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Hosehead <A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jwdv22 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>"Fox Soccer...always craptacular..."<br>I think he meant PQ, not programming.<br>*RIMSHOT*<br>Thank you, thank you, I will be here all week.<br> </div>LOL...<br><br>That is correct...PQ...<br><br>I would spend the money on Setanta, but will the PQ be as bad as FSC?<br> </div>Setanta is much better. Not HD (obviously) but better than FoxSoccer and (gasp) GolTv]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22125125</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:13:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22125031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more audio burp when using DVR functions?  </div>Nope - perfect!<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>TOSLINK working?  </div>All HDMI connections here - never tried it.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Coax output working? </div>Ditto.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more "CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE" when tuning channels?  </div>Nope. Fixed.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more unplugging the damn box to fix the last mentioned?  </div>Never had to do this, for any reason.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more "HUB ERROR" when using VOD? </div>Nope.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No pixelation on any given channel?  </div> <br><br>Sometimes - this is *not* a IMG problem (IMHO).<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more video freeze up on recorded programs? (especially Fox)  </div>Nope.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No more audio drops on recorded programs too?  </div>Nope - I do a lot of time shifting, since I travel a lot.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Told ya i had issues with the 7216 when i had one :)<br> </div>Now's the time to go get another one - they actually work!<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22125031</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:54:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22124653</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Jaydee-<br><br>I accept your dare. Taping a  History HD show now on my 7216 - will watch it via the bedroom 7100 HD box as soon as the other half is up.  :D<br><br>Edit: Just played it back - no issues whatsoever.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22124653</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:30:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>HMDVR Remote Playback BUG *STILL* ENDURES</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22124221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I really can't believe they CANNOT get this POS right.<br><br>Go record something from HistHD on your 7216-1, and try, <b>just TRY,</b> to play it back on any of your 7100-1 boxes.<br><br><u>Go ahead, I dare you.</u><br><br>How f'n long are customers expected to PAY to be BETA testers?! It's ridiculous already.<br><br>Screw the guide, Screw the "responsiveness" of the remote, Screw the Currently Unavailable, <u>Screw all of it!</u><br><br>If they CAN'T get the HM-DVR's most *CORE* functions working 100%, it's only a "Partial" HM-DVR. Why bother with bells and whistles?<br><br>Sheesh these should be A #1 Priority.<br><br>On a lighter note, on the 7216-1 itself, at least the Fox network "video-freezes while audio continues unimpeded" when time-shifting Live TV, or playing back a recording, has been resolved. That was bad, but I <i>could</i> suffer through it, since the audio didn't stop as well.<br><br>But the HistHD thing, c'mon, that's ENTIRELY UNWATCHABLE. No way, no how.<br><br>I'd be surprised if there weren't other channels which exhibit the same problem also.<br><br>Sorry, this is a show stopper. All their resources should be immediately put into this and fixed on an emergent basis. And NOT rolled out over 8 weeks!<br><br>How the hell does this garbage even get out of the Lab?! Who the hell works in QA over there Junior High dropouts?!?<br><br>/Super frustrated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22124221</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:21:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22123144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1631729"><b>vho6</b></A> : As yet another point of reference, Remote DVR now works in 1.6.2 [VHO6 - Burlington MA] with my non-ActionTec router (Linksys WRT150N w/DDWRT) as the primary router without any special configuration.<br><br>After the the 1.6.2 upgrade I was finally prompted for activation on the &raquo;www.verizon.com/fiostvcentral site and it could properly see and manage both of my HD DVRs (QIP6416-2).<br><br>Note - This was also cross-posted here:<br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21120487-FIOS-TV-Central-website-access-with-Non-AT-Router">FIOS TV Central website access with Non AT Router?</A><br><br>-vho6]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22123144</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122635</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I was reading thru some of te Help topics and came across one that said in the future you will be able to configure when a new message is received, whether you want to use the STB light or not. So maybe they will use it after all.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122635</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:59:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122502</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Joe-<br><br>I can honestly say ZERO of your points happen anymore..it's a happy day!<br> </div>INDEED IT IS, im still gonna wait a bit until i get a new box brought out :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122502</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:34:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122500</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : What about thay guy with the Last bug?  :o]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122500</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:33:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122498</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Joe-<br><br>I can honestly say ZERO of your points happen anymore..it's a happy day!<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122498</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:33:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122493</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  stevec325 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Ditto. No issues at all with my 7126 after 1.6.2. The only real issue that I had was the audio burp. I still keep waiting for it, but it never happens anymore (sniff) :)<br> </div>No more audio burp when using DVR functions? TOSLINK working? Coax output working? No more "CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE" when tuning channels? No more unplugging the damn box to fix the last mentioned? No more "HUB ERROR" when using VOD? No pixelation on any given channel? No more video freeze up on recorded programs? (especially Fox) No more audio drops on recorded programs too?<br><br>Told ya i had issues with the 7216 when i had one :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122493</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:31:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : Ditto. No issues at all with my 7126 after 1.6.2. The only real issue that I had was the audio burp. I still keep waiting for it, but it never happens anymore (sniff) :)<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22122126</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121770</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  joe01880 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>You better not get that 7xxx box back quite yet Joe<br> </div>Thats the conclusion im coming to from reading this thread and no ones jumping up to sing praises for the 7216's with the new update. Thanks!<br> </div>Hell - this 1.6.2 fixed ALL of the 7216 issues on my end! Sing sing sing the praises!!!  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121770</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:06:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You better not get that 7xxx box back quite yet Joe<br> </div>Thats the conclusion im coming to from reading this thread and no ones jumping up to sing praises for the 7216's with the new update. Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121670</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:51:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : You better not get that 7xxx box back quite yet Joe]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121584</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:38:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121574</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Hosehead <A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Since I have only had a 7216 for a day and have only spent about an hour with it, I will have to do a little more research.  I noticed that a few times I click Last to go back to the previous channel, the guide bar for the new channel would appear on the bottom of the screen, but the old channel would remain.  When I hit last again, the guide bar would change to the current channel, and the current channel would remain.  On the third press, the channel would change and the guide bar would change correctly as well.  Saw that a few times last night...<br></div>Im not experiencing that on my 6416-2 with the new update.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121574</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:37:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Having been in both forums, I can honestly say this place is more fun!!  :)<br> </div>I agree with Matcarl, its a bit over moderated over there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22121184</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:29:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120987</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Having been in both forums, I can honestly say this place is more fun!!  :)<br> </div>I would agree with that in general.  DSLR is like those social networking sites :o without the perverts....lol]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120987</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:52:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Having been in both forums, I can honestly say this place is more fun!!  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120974</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:50:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120961</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Yes, there are many of us who also post there too<br> </div>I'll have to sign up there just for the sheer fun..... :)<br><br>I didn't realize I had posted your profile link so I corrected it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120961</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:48:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120940</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Yes, there are many of us who also post there too]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120940</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120867</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : Wow... a celebrity.  I just discovered this:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://forums.verizon.com/" >forums.verizon.com/</A><br>Didn't know that parallel world forum existed.. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120867</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:30:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120733</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Hose, if that Last bug keeps happening, let us know.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120733</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:06:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120716</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : Since I have only had a 7216 for a day and have only spent about an hour with it, I will have to do a little more research.  I noticed that a few times I click Last to go back to the previous channel, the guide bar for the new channel would appear on the bottom of the screen, but the old channel would remain.  When I hit last again, the guide bar would change to the current channel, and the current channel would remain.  On the third press, the channel would change and the guide bar would change correctly as well.  Saw that a few times last night...<br><br>Other than that, no issues yet.  Will spend some research time later in the week to see what else I can find...<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120716</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:03:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120639</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : Having had some time to look at the new update i can say the SDPQ has gotten much better. I find it equal to that of 1.5 and still no where near as good as with a 7216.<br><br>The guide catching up when scrolling at super sonic speed only takes about 1 second on my 6416 so im not seeing where that is a problem at all.<br><br>What im currious to know are things i will not be able to see. Has the "currently unavailable" stopped with the 7216, and the audio drops, audio burps using DVR functions, "Hub Error" using VOD and pixelation issue, basicly wanting the best SD PQ i can get, are the problems with the 7216 repaired with this update. My reason being when esata expansion becomes avaiable its going to be on that STB first and if the update didnt fix the problems with the 7216 as well as address the problems 1.6.0 caused in the other boxes whats the point!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120639</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:52:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120634</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jwdv22 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>"Fox Soccer...always craptacular..."<br>I think he meant PQ, not programming.<br>*RIMSHOT*<br>Thank you, thank you, I will be here all week.<br> </div>LOL...<br><br>That is correct...PQ...<br><br>I would spend the money on Setanta, but will the PQ be as bad as FSC?<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120634</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:51:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120517</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><b>jwdv22</b></A> : "Fox Soccer...always craptacular..."<br>I think he meant PQ, not programming.<br>*RIMSHOT*<br>Thank you, thank you, I will be here all week.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120517</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:33:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120512</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Got the upgrade and was watching this morning, changed channels and got the new and improved not available screen.<br>"Try switching to another channel and back to this one"...also gave a phone number and an express code for further assistance.  Called it and an automated system said to correct the problem it would need to reset the boxes.  It did that and reminded me that I could also unplug the box instead of calling.  Solved the problem so far.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120512</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:32:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120385</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Agent-<br>What are the bad SD culprits?<br><br>I always think DIY, Fine Living, Logo, BBC America are 4 of the worst from a PQ standpoint, but that's based on what's provided to VZ.<br> </div>Fox Soccer...always craptacular...<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22120385</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:11:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119677</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Like Fx SD and fox.<br><br>What im saying is its like watching a 700kb  quality Vid with 128kb sound or 56kb.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119677</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:08:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119648</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Agent-<br>What are the bad SD culprits?<br><br>I always think DIY, Fine Living, Logo, BBC America are 4 of the worst from a PQ standpoint, but that's based on what's provided to VZ.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119648</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:04:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119541</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Bad. <br><br>Signal levels are at 23 to 26db and fine the 7100 HD boxes on SD channels are fine but the DVR 7216 box is not fine on SD channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119541</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:46:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119503</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Take the shades off while watching TV  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119503</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:37:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119468</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/553337"><b>jbee</b></A> : Is that a good or bad thing?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119468</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:32:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119448</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Some SD channels look like boot leg movie quality.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119448</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:29:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119411</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Agent-<br><br>With the 7216 box, we've never had an SD quality issue.<br><br>So, the 1.6.2 naturally will and did not have an effect on the PQ.<br><br>It may just be you.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119411</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:21:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119395</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : i Don't get it i have the same box 7216 HD and new update but SD still the same is it the settings  ihave a Sony trinitron 33 inch not a HD tv though.<br><br>Or its just me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119395</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:18:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119256</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1072064"><b>Sympathy</b></A> : Got the 1.6.2 update here as well. The SD picture quality has really improved on my HD TV. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119256</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:53:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119246</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : Just an update...after I received the update some time ago, I was still very disappointed with the SD quality.  Now, after much jumping up and down and holding my breath (and after a ton of work by Gustavo), I finally have a 7216 instead of a 6xxx series.  <br><br>Now I can finally see drastic improvement in my SD quality. THIS is what I had been waiting for!<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119246</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:50:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119243</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450147"><b>bcushman</b></A> : Got it here also - much better SD PQ. And, at least for me, this is the first time that I have received an update and the HD DVRs weren't shut off. Didn't think I had gotten it until I checked the system info.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119243</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:50:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119231</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/303545"><b>UofMiamiGrad</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Yeah I got the update also and noticed the SD picture was much clearer now, like it used to be before they futsed around with it last year.<br>I hear my box getting the update around 3:30 am.<br> </div>That was when my QIP 7100 boxes got their update.  Was just heading to bed then & saw the channel number instead of the clock, then realized it was just updated.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119231</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:47:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119228</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1050874"><b>jdrtech</b></A> : Hello guys, got the upgrade here on Staten Island N.Y today, the problem i had the most before the upgrade was the multiroom dvr, video hub lost and fast forwording recorded programing, its seem to be working now and i hope it says this way!!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119228</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:47:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119227</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Greg-<br>Yes.<br><br>The next "unofficial" areas to go next will be next Tuesday, 3/31:<br><br>VHO4, VHO9, VHO9A (MD / DC / VA)<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119227</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:47:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1552888"><b>Greg2600</b></A> : So NY/NNJ have been upgraded to 1.6.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119210</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119141</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : Yeah I got the update also and noticed the SD picture was much clearer now, like it used to be before they futsed around with it last year.<br>I heard my box getting the update around 3:30 am.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22119141</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:27:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118982</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : The SD box was never affected with the picture quality problem]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118982</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:44:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Cause they said the SD box has more of a affect on the update. SD channels they said are clearer then the HD boxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118964</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:38:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118930</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The one thing I did notice is that when you first turn on the STB, you used to get the info bar with the current show playing, now it doesn't display anymore..<br> </div>Mat-<br>Could this potentially be since now the STB is never "really" turned off?<br> </div>No, it also happens when you select a channel from the guide, it used to go to the new channel with the info bar, that's gone too, it's related.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118930</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:26:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118923</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Billy Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Still got Pixelation..<br> </div>Billy-<br>If you're having pixelation, that has nothing to do with the software...<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118923</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:23:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118919</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The one thing I did notice is that when you first turn on the STB, you used to get the info bar with the current show playing, now it doesn't display anymore..<br> </div>Mat-<br>Could this potentially be since now the STB is never "really" turned off?<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118919</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:22:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118913</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Agent Smith <A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Yea i do have the 7xxx box that sucks. <br> </div>Why does that suck? LOL. You've NEVER had the SD quality issue.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118913</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:21:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118912</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Yea i do have the 7xxx box that sucks. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118912</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:20:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118888</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I think the HD box does have better response from the multiroom DVR, that's my opinion with 1.6.0, I'll have to try it with 1.6.2, but I quickly checked this mornning on the SD box and it was still sloppy. In fact I don't think it jumps back a few seconds anymore, it used to jump back a few seconds but did it very sloppy, now it seems like you will definitely need to hit Replay. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118888</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:10:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><b>JPL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by abh :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>ABH-<br><br>I watch HD programs via the MR feature quite often (and i have 1.6.2) To me, the response time is identical as to if I was watching it on the DVR.<br> </div>Jeep,<br>Really? My response time has always been SO much worse from the remote TV's than from the DVR. Is it better with 1.6.2 than it was with 1.6.0?<br> </div>I see the same thing that you do, ABH.  The response time on my other STB is much slower than it is on the DVR itself.  Looks like Matt is using an HD STB on his other TV.  I just have the SD STB (QIP2500).  I wonder if that makes the difference.  Which box are you using?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118875</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:05:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118857</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Agent Smith <A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nvm i got it =] it said in messages you will receive the update.<br><br>But does the update continusly go on for the whole day or all at once seems like the HD channels are better and SD look the same.<br> </div>Update happens all at once. Did you have the 7xxx series box, if so, there is no change to SD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118857</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:57:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118837</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Nvm i got it =] it said in messages you will receive the update.<br><br>But does the update continusly go on for the whole day or all at once seems like the HD channels are better and SD look the same.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118837</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:48:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118825</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : I got it today , but when I am changing the channel, it goes back the info bar , but Im on the new channel but then it goes to the new info bar channel. Still got Pixelation and my Audio has changed much, MSG I get good Audio its like the only channel with either HDMI or component cable after seeing both, the Audio thing happened before the update. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118825</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:44:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118817</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : I still didnt get the update..its alredy 3/24! and i know i dont have to reset the box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118817</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:40:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118746</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><b>NastyGrouch</b></A> : ill take better sd pq any day over the info bar issue, but i do feel for you.<br><br>My eyes where bleeding and hemorrhaging from the inside from the blurry pic. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118746</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:56:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118673</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : SD picture is better than before 1.6.0. The Urge Channels used to be extremely blurry but on a QAM tuner they were perfect, now they are the same as the QAM tuner. The audio settings did not move like they usually do after a reboot, so it looks like they fixed that too. The one thing I did notice is that when you first turn on the STB, you used to get the info bar with the current show playing, now it doesn't display anymore, it also doesn't display when you select a channel from the guide, that's a bit of a drawback.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118673</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:51:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118576</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><b>NastyGrouch</b></A> : I got the update, the sd pq is better for sure, now im off to change settings, wooopppeeee.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118576</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:39:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1448990"><b>Cogdis</b></A> : I take it back it's actually still not done yet for me.  I have picture but I can't do anything like see the guide or dvr ect.<br><br>Edit again: Ok NOW it's done.  First thing I notice is that the Closed Captioning STILL doesn't work for SD video.  As always it flashes out of sync and too fast to read.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118555</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:17:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118553</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : The upgrader started here at 2:52 and seems to have ended at 3:10. Time to go play with it:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118553</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:15:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1448990"><b>Cogdis</b></A> : Upgrade just started in NY.  Right in the middle of my movie!<br>Edit: Only took about 10 minutes.  Not too bad. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22118542</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116754</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : I wonder if the fix will rid the pixelation on the 7100 box. Its bad and its on some channels along with currently avaialabe , and I am not talking about the NYC / SI PEG Channels, I already know they are not on yet. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116754</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:39:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116667</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Lets see i have 1 7216 HD DVR Box and 2 7100 HD boxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116667</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:25:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116530</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : good thanks ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116530</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:57:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116512</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Billy Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ok thanks, well I hope theres not a better PQ on the 6xxx boxes then the 7100. I hope its the same, and I don't have a DVR and don't plan on one. <br> </div>Other posters who have gotten the upgrade still say the 7xxx has better SD PQ although the 6xxx SD PQ is much improved.<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116512</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:53:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116488</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : ok thanks, well I hope theres not a better PQ on the 6xxx boxes then the 7100. I hope its the same, and I don't have a DVR and don't plan on one. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116488</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:48:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/867576"><b>HenryFarpolo</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Billy Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>so tomorrow is my 1.6.2 update in Staten Island, NY (VHO 5). so what do I look foward to ? I have 2 7100 HD boxes and 1 2500 SD box. Thanks <br> </div>It will be sunny, but cooler than normal for March!! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116481</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:46:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116470</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Most of the fixes were for the DVR's and/or 6xxx HD boxes, you may not notice much.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116470</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:44:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116458</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : so tomorrow is my 1.6.2 update in Staten Island, NY (VHO 5). so what do I look foward to ? I have 2 7100 HD boxes and 1 2500 SD box. Thanks ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116458</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:42:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116022</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Cause some channels are SD only like SpikeTv also i don't have a HDTV so their are lettered boxes making it to small on some channels.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22116022</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:24:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115882</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1284406"><b>danclan</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Agent Smith <A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Cant wait till tomorrow better get the update the SD channels been so blur that i watch the HD versions then the SD.<br> </div>well why would you watch the SD version at all if it comes to your home in HD to begin with...<br><br>if you had channels that you watch that are only SD...i can see you watching them in SD then looking on then net for an HD version.... ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115882</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:59:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115768</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Cant wait till tomorrow better get the update the SD channels been so blur that i watch the HD versions then the SD.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115768</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:36:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115730</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ABH-<br><br>I watch HD programs via the MR feature quite often (and i have 1.6.2) To me, the response time is identical as to if I was watching it on the DVR.<br> </div>Jeep,<br>Really? My response time has always been SO much worse from the remote TV's than from the DVR. Is it better with 1.6.2 than it was with 1.6.0?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115730</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:28:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115702</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : ABH-<br><br>I watch HD programs via the MR feature quite often (and i have 1.6.2) To me, the response time is identical as to if I was watching it on the DVR.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115702</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:23:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115681</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : On a separate but related note to 1.62, for the Media DVR part, will it improve the latency of operating the DVR from remote locations (ie TVs that are the not the Home Media hub)? This was very annoying to me as the response time is so slow to ff, rw, open the recorded show list, etc.<br><br>Can anyone who has 1.62 tell me if the response time is any better? Thanks in advance.<br>Adam]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115681</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:20:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115651</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/394432"><b>RolteC</b></A> : Lets see what happens tomorrow morning.  I got my new 40inch tv ready with the SD box, and my larger tv with the HD box.  Lets see what difference it makes with the picture/anything else!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22115651</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:15:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1428209"><b>lanslide</b></A> : Will we ever be able to record an HD program an watch it on another HD DVR? Right now we can only watch it with an HD box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114884</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:51:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114692</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/268953"><b>willdogs</b></A> : Thanks all for the answers!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114692</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:19:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114298</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : 1.5 came in at 5:30am and 1.6.0 came in at 3:30am, so i think it fair to say some time in the middle of the night and or wee early hours of the morning. Unless of course it doesnt, we are talking about Verizon.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114298</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:09:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114252</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  willdogs <A HREF="/useremail/u/268953"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Awaiting the upgrade tomorrow 3/24 in NY City.<br><br>Quick question that i could not find the answer to in this LARGE thread, what time do the upgrades usually take place? Is there a set time? Or do they just start at 12am and roll it out little by little all day?<br> </div>Usually during off-hours but if you are planning on hosting an upgrade party at your home, let us know and we'll be there.... ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114252</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:59:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114251</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : Usually in the wee hours of the morning.  I got the 1.6.0 upgrade at about 4 AM and 1.6.2 came in at about 2:30 AM.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114251</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:59:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114217</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/268953"><b>willdogs</b></A> : Awaiting the upgrade tomorrow 3/24 in NY City.<br><br>Quick question that i could not find the answer to in this LARGE thread, what time do the upgrades usually take place? Is there a set time? Or do they just start at 12am and roll it out little by little all day?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22114217</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:52:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22111532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1579277"><b>hobbes79</b></A> : This is a great upgrade... I've streamed a full 2-hour movie to an HD box through the multi-room functionality.  Even over several nights of stopping it, pausing it, rewinding it... no problems :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22111532</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:23:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22110162</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : Some TV's may also have reset issues if the AC power is interrupted - like defaulting to a specific channel or input, loss of some stored parameters, clock reset (FWIW), etc.<br><br>It appears that the Aux outlet can handle a reasonable amount of load - 500W max, so that should not be too much of an issue for most TVs.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22110162</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:53:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22109986</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1220089"><b>siersema</b></A> : Good Word Buddy :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22109986</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:01:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22109721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : I can't use the secondary AC plug for the living room tv. It is a LCoS TV, and the fan needs to run for a minute or so after the TV is off. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22109721</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:46:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22108984</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1220089"><b>siersema</b></A> : It seems so simple to use the secondary AC plug in the back to control the TV Power.  When the DVR is off, so is the TV!  I take it through a power strip that has a control circuit that when a device is turned on or off, a series of other jacks also turn off.  I happen to use the audio receiver for control (if it is left on you still get sound/noise on the speakers!)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22108984</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22108216</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by zooly :</small><br><br>OK, but this begs the question: how do I know which VHO I am?<br> </div>On your remote, hit "Menu" then navigate:<br><br>Settings - System Info.  <br><br>Your VHO number SHOULD be the last two digits of the number following VHO ID:<br><br>Example, mine:  VHO ID: 3308 -- I'm in VHO 8<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22108216</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:36:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22107133</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Several folks were nice enough to post a VHO list, but I'll be glad to repost it:<br><br>vho 1 Carrollton, TX<br>vho 2 Temple Terrace, FL<br>vho 3 Pomona, CA<br>vho 4 Silver Spring, MD<br>vho 5 Queens, NY<br>vho 6 Burlington, MA<br>vho 6a Rhode Island<br>vho 7 Freehold, NJ<br>vho 8 Philadelphia, PA<br>vho 9 Richmond, VA<br>vho 9a Norfolk, VA<br>vho 10 Fort Wayne, IN<br>vho 11 Pittsburgh, PA<br>vho 12 Portland, OR<br>vho 13 Seattle, WA<br>vho 14 Harrisburg, PA<br>vho 15 Buffalo, NY]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22107133</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:45:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22107102</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by fios tech person :</small><br><br>Sorry, let me repost the upcoming dates more clearly:<br><br>VHO-5,VHO-6,VHO-6a:     3/24/2009<br>VHO-4,VHO-9,VHO-9a:     3/31/2009<br>VHO-2,VHO-10,VHO-11:     4/7/2009<br>VHO-1,VHO-3:     4/14/2009<br> </div>OK, but this begs the question: how do I know which VHO I am?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22107102</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:38:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22105734</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  timrek <A HREF="/useremail/u/1281783"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Program the power button on the Phillips remote to to turn off the tv and the cable box. <br> </div>I have a Harmony 880 in the bedroom, and a Harmony One for the living room, and even that doesn't guarantee the TV will be off. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22105734</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:37:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22105385</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1281783"><b>timrek</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  carljanderso <A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  John97 <A HREF="/useremail/u/240953"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Looks like I got it...  The "turn off your TV, dummy" splash screen is a big help considering some people in my house have difficulty turning the TV off once the cable box is turned off.<br> </div>do we have the same wife?<br><br> :p   ;)<br> </div>Program the power button on the Phillips remote to to turn off the tv and the cable box. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22105385</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:25:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22104983</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  John97 <A HREF="/useremail/u/240953"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Looks like I got it...  The "turn off your TV, dummy" splash screen is a big help considering some people in my house have difficulty turning the TV off once the cable box is turned off.<br> </div>do we have the same wife?<br><br> :p   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22104983</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:36:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22104139</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NY Tel <A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I think some insurance plans cover medical treatment for blurred TV...... :p<br> </div>Even with my coke bottles, "Currently Unavailable" is hard to see through :p<br>You'd think Verizon thought this update might burst into flames the way they are distributing.  I can only think they must have been burnt before, Like the surface of the sun :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22104139</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:09:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NastyGrouch <A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>The wait is killing me, the sd channels are getting blurier ans blurrier each day as the 24th appoaches, its all mental but still, why verizon why cant you send it to all at the same time, why why why<br> </div>I think some insurance plans cover medical treatment for blurred TV...... :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103974</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:30:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103941</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1589287"><b>NastyGrouch</b></A> : The wait is killing me, the sd channels are getting blurier ans blurrier each day as the 24th appoaches, its all mental but still, why verizon why cant you send it to all at the same time, why why why]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103941</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:25:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : Mine still says 1.6.0 so I guess I am on track for update on the 24th.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103875</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:07:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hobbes79 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1579277"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I got the 1.6.2 update yesterday... I'm in Andover, MA.<br> </div>No such luck in Marlborough, MA.  This must be to a smaller region than 06]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22103721</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:33:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22102236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/986823"><b>NY Tel</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JohnA <A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  CrobertGauth <A HREF="/useremail/u/1512118"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Rather than giving people the fish, how about we teach them how?  </div>Be good if you used a correct list, if you think you must teach.<br> </div>Reminds me of that old addage:<br><br>Those that CAN,  - do!<br>Those that can't, - teach!<br>Those that can't teach.  - teach GYM! :p :p :p<br><br>Ok it was a joke, no flames please.....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22102236</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:37:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101702</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/240953"><b>John97</b></A> : Looks like I got it...  The "turn off your TV, dummy" splash screen is a big help considering some people in my house have difficulty turning the TV off once the cable box is turned off.<br><small>--<br>So put me on a highway, and show me a sign.<br>And take it to the limit one more time...</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101702</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:58:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101650</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Agent Smith <A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Does it happen on the 7100 HD Boxes i have? Bronx ny<br> </div>Does what happen? Every box will get the upgrade. The upgrade affects different models in different ways.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101650</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:47:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101593</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : Does it happen on the 7100 HD Boxes i have? Bronx ny]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101593</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:39:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101204</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1561502"><b>bkrickles</b></A> : is that on the 6416 box? (hddvr)<br>I'm anxiously waiting for next week]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101204</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:41:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Some people got it 5 days early, guess you were lucky]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101126</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:26:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101120</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Soft rollout for NY occured yesterday morning. I got it. SD PQ is back to what it was prior to October of last year. I also donot see the info bar bug everyone is talking about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22101120</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:26:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22100887</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1579277"><b>hobbes79</b></A> : I got the 1.6.2 update yesterday... I'm in Andover, MA.<br><br>I'm not making this up - I was on an SD channel and thought "wow, that looks good".  Thought I'd check the version I was on, and there it was... 1.6.2 :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22100887</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:44:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097596</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by fios tech person :</small><br><br>Sorry, let me repost the upcoming dates more clearly: </div>Thank You!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097596</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:20:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097502</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Sorry, let me repost the upcoming dates more clearly:<br><br>VHO-5,VHO-6,VHO-6a:     3/24/2009<br>VHO-4,VHO-9,VHO-9a:     3/31/2009<br>VHO-2,VHO-10,VHO-11:     4/7/2009<br>VHO-1,VHO-3:     4/14/2009]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097502</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:02:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097459</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : A complete list of the dates, in case it hasn't been posted yet:<br><br>VHO-14,VHO-15, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;2/26/2009 <br>VHO-7,VHO-8, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;3/10/2009 <br>VHO-12,VHO-13, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;3/17/2009 <br>VHO-5,VHO-6,VHO-6a, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;3/24/2009 <br>VHO-4,VHO-9,VHO-9a, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;3/31/2009 <br>VHO-2,VHO-10,VHO-11, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;4/7/2009 <br>VHO-1,VHO-3, &#9;1.6.2 &#9;4/14/2009  <br><br>These are "target" dates and therefore may change, though there have been no delays so far. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097459</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:55:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097426</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : VHO2 updates on 4/7/09]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22097426</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:50:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22096833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1359302"><b>Gerryex</b></A> : Hi ALL,<br><br>I know its in here somewhere but I can't seem to find it.  When will Florida (I believe VHO 02) get 1.6.2?<br><br>Thanks,<br>Gerry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22096833</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:00:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089769</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>March 24<br> </div>Thats the same date as Mass and RI. If it goes bad phones will stop working all over the east coast.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089769</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Tom Petty sure was right]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089619</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:07:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089603</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Thank You. "The waiting is the hardest part".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089603</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:04:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089073</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : March 24]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22089073</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:36:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22088920</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : When Is NYC, getting the update?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22088920</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:10:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : Except that CrobertGauth didn't post the list in the first place, only the tip on where to go to see the VHO ID.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079974</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:08:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079775</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><b>JohnA</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  CrobertGauth <A HREF="/useremail/u/1512118"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Rather than giving people the fish, how about we teach them how?  </div>Be good if you used a correct list, if you think you must teach.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079775</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:33:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079711</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1512118"><b>CrobertGauth</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by rbost :</small><br><br>Braigo64-- you are in VHO 10 and here in Richmond, Va. we are in VHO 9. It seems that no one knows the schedule for our updates.<br>VHO 1--Texas<br>    2--Fla.<br>    3--Calif.<br>    4--Md.<br>    5--N.Y.<br>    6--Mass./R.I.<br>    7--No. N.J.<br>    8--cent. N.J./Del<br>    9--9A Rich.,Va  9B Hpt. Rds.<br>   10--N. Va./D.C./Md.<br>   11--Ind.<br>   12--Pa.<br>   13--Ore.<br>   14--Wash. State<br>   15--Pa.<br>   16--Buff. N.Y.<br> </div>Rather than giving people the fish, how about we teach them how? If I look under the menu - settings - system information  I see an field labeled VHO ID. It is a 4 digit number. Last two are 04 for me. Is it safe to assuyme that everyone who looks there can ascertain their own VHO ID?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22079711</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:22:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22078584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Got ours last thursday, 3/12. So far it has been mostly good. <br><br>Watching HD recorded shows on the second HD set-top box finally appears to have been fixed. We watched an hour long show, and no skip backs to the beginning, no lost hub, no problems at all :) Very happy. <br><br>We did have a problem one night when we were watching an HD recording on the Main DVR, and my daughter was watching an HD recording on the HD set-top box at the same time. Every so often there would be a momentary pause, usually 3 or 4 in a row. My guess is that they were when my daughter upstairs was skipping ads, as they were happening at about the right frequency for that. <br><br>Haven't noticed it again since. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22078584</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:37:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22071791</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  FiOS LIVE <A HREF="/useremail/u/1598927"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>As for the negative, I'm not a fan of the new mini-guide only displaying the current channel and I miss being able to see the neighboring channels in the mini-guide. It's only purpose now is to see what's on that single channel in the future rather than 3 channels. I feel it has been limited in its features rather than polished.<br> </div>You can scroll up and down for any other channel then select one]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22071791</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 11:16:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22071740</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1312977"><b>Bill Odom</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  braigo64 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1586820"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Ok, I haven't seen this in the entire thread. Tentative date for Northern VA/DC area? and what number is the VHO for us?</div><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>VHO4 - 3/31</div>As posted by JeepMatt on February 27.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22071740</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:55:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22067336</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : I love the option to shut off the Display. I actually think I sleep better at night with out my bedroom being lit up.<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22067336</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:35:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22064534</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : It was since 1.6.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22064534</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:33:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22064446</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1488971"><b>rpjoe</b></A> : i noticed the clock is dead on balls accurate now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22064446</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:19:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22063446</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : I get the same problem on some local HD feeds.  Specifically, the local ABC affiliate's news broadcasts, Jeopardy, Wheel; NBC's Jay Leno, Gonad Obrien (when he was on) and a lot during commercials.<br><br>I see the issue on both FiOS and with my OTA ATSC tuner during these shows.  This is via the optical inputs to my Yamaha receiver when using their enhanced Dolby or using their DSP processor selections.  If I switch to normal Dolby, it is not as bad but is still there - an awful lot of signal is in the surround channels and is fairly heavily delayed (reverbed).<br><br>So, I don't think that this is a FiOS problem, I think it's a buggered Dolby feed from the provider.  This was also the case with 1.6.0...<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22063446</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:18:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22063046</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1568454"><b>PJL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by izub :</small><br><br>North Seattle area got 1.6.2 this am had 1.6.1...don't see much difference...Everything is working great except I don't get 5.1 sound on MLB HD... I can't figure this out, every other channel is perfect...getting NO SOUND from center channel and surrounds on MLB HD.I called Fios no help, may call again and escalate ,since I was hoping 1.6.2 would fix this...<br> </div>Are you sure MLB HD broadcases in 5.1?  Not all services do.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22063046</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:01:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22061135</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : North Seattle area got 1.6.2 this am had 1.6.1...don't see much difference...Everything is working great except I don't get 5.1 sound on MLB HD... I can't figure this out, every other channel is perfect...getting NO SOUND from center channel and surrounds on MLB HD.I called Fios no help, may call again and escalate ,since I was hoping 1.6.2 would fix this...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22061135</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:25:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059702</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1598927"><b>FiOS LIVE</b></A> : I just noticed the update now (I use a TiVo HD on the main TV I use) and just from my initial look at it (about 5 min) I've got two comments, a positive and a negative.<br><br>I'll start with the positive, I like the message after the STB is turned off that displays on the TV letting you know that the TV is still on. Plus, I like that you can just press the menu button from there if you decide to turn back on the STB. This feature is really going to help those out who can't tell that their TV is still on but the STB is off.<br><br>As for the negative, I'm not a fan of the new mini-guide only displaying the current channel and I miss being able to see the neighboring channels in the mini-guide. It's only purpose now is to see what's on that single channel in the future rather than 3 channels. I feel it has been limited in its features rather than polished.<br><small>--<br>AT&T + Comcast<br>Your world. Destroyed. <br>Throttle and put a cap on it. It's Comcastic!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059702</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:35:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : thanks ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059619</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059566</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : it is primarily a maintenance releases. you can read this thread for a preview ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059566</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:09:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059507</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : what does the 1.6.2 have ? Can I get a preview before March 24 , VHO 5 Staten Island? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059507</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:55:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059421</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1569488"><b>tbare54</b></A> : thank you i guess i just have to wait.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059421</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:40:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059402</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Pittsburgh/Florida/Indiana are all the same]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059402</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:37:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1569488"><b>tbare54</b></A> : how about a date for Indiana]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059380</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:34:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059359</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : April 7]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059359</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:30:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059304</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : matcarl,<br><br>Can you give us the date for VHO 11, Pittsburgh?<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22059304</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:20:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058686</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : 4]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058686</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:42:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058682</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by rbost  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>VHO9 is 3/31 & VHO10 is 4/7. VHO10 by the way is Indiana, you have several wrong<br> </div>Please correct this list for us. Thanks,<br> </div>10-Indiana<br>11-Pittsburgh<br>12-Oregon<br>13-Washington<br>14-Harrisburg<br>15-Buffalo<br> </div>then what VHo is DC?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058682</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:41:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058637</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by rbost :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>VHO9 is 3/31 & VHO10 is 4/7. VHO10 by the way is Indiana, you have several wrong<br> </div>Please correct this list for us. Thanks,<br> </div>OR is VHO 12]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058637</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:32:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058636</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by rbost :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>VHO9 is 3/31 & VHO10 is 4/7. VHO10 by the way is Indiana, you have several wrong<br> </div>Please correct this list for us. Thanks,<br> </div>10-Indiana<br>11-Pittsburgh<br>12-Oregon<br>13-Washington<br>14-Harrisburg<br>15-Buffalo]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058636</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:32:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058625</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>VHO9 is 3/31 & VHO10 is 4/7. VHO10 by the way is Indiana, you have several wrong<br> </div>Please correct this list for us. Thanks,]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058625</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:30:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058616</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Same as NY 3/24]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058616</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:27:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1602994"><b>hernanu</b></A> : When is Massachusetts (VHo6?) being updated? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058584</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:23:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058200</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1532318"><b>SpicaTC50</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by skoot :</small><br><br>>>Ice, I am sorry but why do you have an HD STB hooked to an SD TV?<br><br>FWIW- I have a SD TV in my bedroom with an HD STB-- with the SD STB I was unable to view any of my HD recorded shows from the HD DVR in the living room-- almost all of my recordings are in HD so it made the Home Media DVR pretty useless.<br><br>Now I can watch all my recordings, all of the channels, and I usually prefer to watch the HD shows letterboxed on the SD TV.  <br> </div>Interesting. So you output the HD STB at 480i?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058200</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 14:18:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058011</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Onedollar <A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>VHO TWEE?!(3)Date please<br> </div>4/14]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058011</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:52:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058002</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><b>Onedollar</b></A> : VHO TWEE?!(3)Date please]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22058002</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:51:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : VHO9 is 3/31 & VHO10 is 4/7. VHO10 by the way is Indiana, you have several wrong]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057964</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:46:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057927</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Braigo64-- you are in VHO 10 and here in Richmond, Va. we are in VHO 9. It seems that no one knows the schedule for our updates.<br>VHO 1--Texas<br>    2--Fla.<br>    3--Calif.<br>    4--Md.<br>    5--N.Y.<br>    6--Mass./R.I.<br>    7--No. N.J.<br>    8--cent. N.J./Del<br>    9--9A Rich.,Va  9B Hpt. Rds.<br>   10--N. Va./D.C./Md.<br>   11--Ind.<br>   12--Pa.<br>   13--Ore.<br>   14--Wash. State<br>   15--Pa.<br>   16--Buff. N.Y.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057927</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:40:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057592</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1527944"><b>gregg62</b></A> : Seems like they finally fixed the audio dropout problem.<br>Awesome.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057592</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:47:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057270</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1136086"><b>ZNYGUY</b></A> : IF you check your guide data in settings and it says something like 2 or 3 days available, you can actually force the box to download more.  Just go into the guide and scroll ahead any number of days that you want.  When you then go back under setting to see how much guide data that you have, you will notice that the number of days has changed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22057270</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:51:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1586820"><b>braigo64</b></A> : Ok, I haven't seen this in the entire thread. Tentative date for Northern VA/DC area? and what number is the VHO for us?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056735</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:01:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056636</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : The "lagging logos" issue resolved itself here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056636</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:41:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056633</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : In OR, I received Release 1.6.2 / Build 08.58 IMG over night. <br><br>Since I already had 1.6.1 and the only bug I noticed  (6200s only here) is the stalling info bar, I don't expect to notice much difference.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056633</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:41:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056414</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : For some reason the boxes sometimes lose the buffer, it happens to me every couple of days.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056414</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:45:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056390</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1534838"><b>RichardH</b></A> : I was updated to 1.6.2.  I have two 6416 DVRs.  This morning, I was watching the news, and there was a segment I wanted my wife to see that had just finished.  I hit record, assuming the recording would include what was in the buffer.  It did not, and all that was in the buffer was lost.  This also happened in the other DVR.  Neither DVR was recording another channel at the time.  I know that before the upgrade at least a certain portion, if not all, of what was in the buffer went into the recording.<br><br>Is this possibly the result of the upgrade?  If so, that is a major loss.  Any one else seeing this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22056390</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:39:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22055758</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : yea I must say on my 2nd attempt with FIOS, SD on HD is finally together, which is wasnt in August-October 2008. Its much improved, could be better, but its a pass. I don't see the grainy , bad quality that I did see. I can compare it to Time Warner SD as HOB (User) does , to the same quality, maybe a slight difference between the 2 , but I can't really favor one over the other. They are pretty much the same. I am sure that it wasnt the same quality when I first had FIOS, because FIOS was bad vs TW Cable in the Summer and the TW PQ SD on HD was better than FIOS, now its about the same, they are both good. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22055758</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:20:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22054182</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  stevec325 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>All disk is non-volatile but not all STBs have disk ;-)<br> </div>Am I the only one that is trying to think of some kind of witty response to this?<br><br>I know it's out there... I just can't put it together :)<br> </div>Be careful - the cyber librarian can be volatile  :D  Keep on keepin' on Darci  ;)<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22054182</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:57:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053859</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : Keep trying, I'm looking forward to what you come up with! ;-) :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053859</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:03:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>All disk is non-volatile but not all STBs have disk ;-)<br> </div>Am I the only one that is trying to think of some kind of witty response to this?<br><br>I know it's out there... I just can't put it together :)<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053813</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:55:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053522</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>instead of being stored in the non-volatile disk. <br> </div>All disk is non-volatile but not all STBs have disk ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053522</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:04:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : Something that I have noticed with 162 is a delay with the logos.  I guess they get downloaded to RAM everytime the box gets shutoff, instead of being stored in the non-volatile disk.  Because once I go over a channel and then go back to said channel, the logo appears with no delay.  <br><br>But I guess if the "CHANNEL UNAVAILABLE" issue is fixed, then this really won't even happen. AND I won't have to shutdown the box every morning before I go to work!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053401</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:43:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053358</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : hope the 6416 and 6200 boxes get fixed the right way, good luck to all those who have those boxes on the SD fix on HDtv's. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053358</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:33:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053332</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : Also Improved on the FIOS STB HD on SD I forgot to mention was Urge Radio , Audio is still low, ESPN News. Test will be tonight when the Knicks will be live on MSG in Detroit. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053332</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:29:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053300</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Received 1.62 Tuesday morning in NNJ.  As reported all issues seem to be resolved.  One thing I noticed (also reported by others)was the channel bar lagging behind when channel surfing.  Once I went through all the channels on a 7100(letting the channel bar catch up each time) the issue was resolved. When I went to the 6416-2 MRHDDVR there was no issue.  Other 7100 boxes are also good.  Had to hard boot one 7100 last night in order to get to a VOD program.  Other then that everything is good.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053300</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:24:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>But my Harmony remote doesn't have a "FIOS TV" button.  :p<br> </div>Mine either.<br><br>What I'd really like is discrete [power on] & [power off] buttons.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053168</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053162</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497490"><b>joetxndallas</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  joetxndallas <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497490"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I'll second the request for any "unofficial" best guesses for a VH01 rollout date.  Thanks to all for the good info.<br><br>Joe<br> </div>4/14<br> </div>Ouch!  O.K. I retract my request for a rollout date!<br><br>Joe]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053162</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:55:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053134</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  joetxndallas <A HREF="/useremail/u/1497490"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I'll second the request for any "unofficial" best guesses for a VH01 rollout date.  Thanks to all for the good info.<br><br>Joe<br> </div>4/14]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053134</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:50:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053115</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497490"><b>joetxndallas</b></A> : I'll second the request for any "unofficial" best guesses for a VH01 rollout date.  Thanks to all for the good info.<br><br>Joe]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22053115</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:45:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052317</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by ekimneems :</small><br><br>All these changes seems pretty cool to me. My one concern is the HDMI handshake issue. I refuse to even go behind my TV and change my setup until I can be 100% sure this time :)<br><br>Any word on that from any brave soul willing to try again?<br> </div>While I have only had the update for a day +, and had experienced the HDMI problem before, it has not occured yet for me.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052317</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:40:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052285</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : ok thanks , looking foward to see what is in store for the 1.6.2 on the 24th in Staten Island. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052285</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052282</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1569488"><b>tbare54</b></A> : any tentative date for 1.6.2 upgrade for Fort Wayne, In market. waiting patiently.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052282</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052277</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><b>JPL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Billy Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>what about the SD 2500 boxes are they getting a fix too? I have one of those . thanks<br> </div>Yes, they get the update too.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052277</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052273</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : all boxes get the same IMG software.<br><br>that software will fix different problems for different boxes. there is no SD quality issue on the SD boxes so there won't be a fix for that but it will still get the new software.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052273</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:34:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : what about the SD 2500 boxes are they getting a fix too? I have one of those . thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052261</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:31:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052233</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : MSG looks much better than last time with MSG +. They can do still work out some kinks to make better , buts its much better than last time. The Weather Channel and Weather scan local got better too. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22052233</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:26:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051886</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : All these changes seems pretty cool to me. My one concern is the HDMI handshake issue. I refuse to even go behind my TV and change my setup until I can be 100% sure this time :)<br><br>Any word on that from any brave soul willing to try again?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051886</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:29:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051872</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : All the boxes are getting the new IMG 1.6.2<br><br>HOWEVER, not all boxes need the same fix. That is, with IMG 1.6.2, the 6xxx boxes will get the broken SD PQ fixed. The  7xxx never HAD broken SD PQ so there is no fix for that included in 1.6.2.<br><br>It does get a little confusing when there are two platforms (e.g. 7xxx and 6xxx) using the same code but result in different bugs in each of the platforms ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051872</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051846</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : thought all the boxes were getting the SD Upgrade, But I guess I was wrong. I didnt know it was only certain boxes ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051846</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:23:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051771</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : ok I guess I misunderstood. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051771</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:10:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051758</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : as matcarl pointed, there wasn't an SD PQ problem with the 7xxx boxes so you won't see any difference on them in two weeks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051758</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:09:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051711</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : thanks for the update. I hope they now discontinue with the older HD boxes. It is slight better, but I think still TWC has a slight advantage of the SD picture over FIOS, but much different then before, the real test will come 2 weeks from tomorrow. Graphics on the 7100 are much clearer then the older ones, thats the difference I see. There close to the SD pic on Time Warner , but not much better, hopefully that happens on 3/24 . ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051711</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:59:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051689</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : If you have that model box, then you have the better SD picture, those boxes were never affected, only the older ones you had last time.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051689</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:55:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051672</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : ok I have installed complete. The SD Picture still with the 1.6.0 in NYC is slightly improved from last time on the HD Set. Still waiting for the upgrade on 3/24 in Staten Island. I have all channels set to 1080 with the SD Override off. Id rather not watch the stretch and settings to 480 I or 480 P make things worse. I have the 7100 HD boxes, last time I had either the 6200 or 6416, whichever one is not the DVR. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051672</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:51:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051551</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Lee GWB <A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Hi,<br>   This happened to me but after I went thru all channels it seemed to stop. I came in late last night and the problem is gone. I assume the router needed a update to the channel tab.. Is it still happening to you or anyone else ?<br>Lee<br>EDIT:<br>    I did see some "lag" but after 1- sec it went back. I was like 7+ sec yesterday. Only on the 7100 units I have not on my 62XX DVR. I'll wait another day before I put in a ticket,, Maybe Monday.<br> </div> It happend to me this morning on my 7100 box. Someone else posted that it only seemed to happen on the non-DVR boxes, but I will experiment more when I get home.  It is intermittent & will "go away" or not happen at all times.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051551</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:34:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Hi,<br>   This happened to me but after I went thru all channels it seemed to stop. I came in late last night and the problem is gone. I assume the router needed a update to the channel tab.. Is it still happening to you or anyone else ?<br>Lee<br>EDIT:<br>    I did see some "lag" but after 1- sec it went back. I was like 7+ sec yesterday. Only on the 7100 units I have not on my 62XX DVR. I'll wait another day before I put in a ticket,, Maybe Monday.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051276</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:43:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051109</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MeatChicken <A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>It apparently seems to be happening intermittently both when flipping channels ( info bar displays wrong channels), & in the guide.<br> Hopfully there will be a "minor patch" quickly rather than wait longer for some major update.<br> </div>This is a pretty big thing in my book. I channel surf the movie channels a lot. If I see something that sounds interesting, I'll watch it. I might not realize I have the wrong channel on until 15 minutes into the movie. It's not a quick patch, they are waiting to fix it in the summer with 1.7, another 6 month wait.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051109</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:12:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051084</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : It apparently seems to be happening intermittently both when flipping channels ( info bar displays wrong channels), & in the guide.<br> Hopfully there will be a "minor patch" quickly rather than wait longer for some major update.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051084</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:08:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051020</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Another feature broken now with another rollout. Any Verizon Employee want to help out with this one?  :uhh: ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22051020</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:55:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050851</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jr461 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It happens on our 6200s (I think that's the model for the standard HD STB - non-DVR) but not on the DVRs.<br><br>Does Verizon know about this?<br> </div>Yes, but unfortunately now we have to wait until 1.7 comes out in the summer, so another wait  :huh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050851</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:26:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050836</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Easy John. I didn't specifically knock any Verizon Employee. Stick to the topic of the thread. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050836</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:23:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050751</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by skoot :</small><br><br>Still an issue=<br>- Changing channels can still be flakey-- the channel number and program info will change to the desired show but the previous channel's program will still be playing. Happens on my HD STB as well.<br> </div>I just tried that and it happens for me, as well.<br><br>Also, if you have the guide displayed and you are paging up/down rapidly, like if you are at ch 913 and you hold down the button to go back to channel 511, when you get there, the guide is wrong. You can fix it by moving up/down one channel - then the guide "catches up".<br><br>This happened with 1.6 and is still there with 1.6.2<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050751</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:06:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050744</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1251487"><b>bwintx</b></A> : Asking again...<br><br>Any rumors from VZ -- or wherever the other rumors have originated -- on when VHO1 (Dal/FtW area) will get 1.6.2?<br><br>TIA for any such info.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050744</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:04:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Still 3/24]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050638</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:39:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050631</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : any word on the changing of the NYC date from 3/24? Im getting installed today. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050631</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:38:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050629</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : ok more than 24 hours.. I asked everyone BUT my son and we have not seen the "Not Supported Mode" on the TV. I know people get a similar message . It does depend on the TV.. I will wait at least until Sunday to report back on this.<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050629</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:38:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050582</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : This just started for you too jr461?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050582</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:28:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050565</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MeatChicken <A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</small><br><br><small>said by skoot :</small><br><br>Still an issue=<br>- Changing channels can still be flakey-- the channel number and program info will change to the desired show but the previous channel's program will still be playing. Happens on my HD STB as well.<br><br> </div><div class="bquote">Ditto - happened to me last night.<br> </div> I just noticed on my 7100 box that, w/1.62, "sometimes" (not always), if you tap the ch down button in about 1 sec increments, the channel actually changes, but the info bar does not, it stays on the previous channel(s) info bar.<br>  It takes at least a few seconds for it to switch/revert to the correct info display, almost until the info bar is ready to dissapear, & never if you are channel surfing.<br>    For Example, if you start at ch. 668 & start tapping down, the info bar for each new channel displays ch 668's, until you stop & sit on a channel for a few seconds, so the box can "figure out" the correct info display.<br>  It happened often enough that I was able to "make it happen" a few times this morning. It also seemed more likley to happen if you haven't changed channels for a while & start surfing fresh.<br> I don't know if my 6416/6200/25xx's  will do this, I haven't had the time to play with them yet.<br> </div>It happens on our 6200s (I think that's the model for the standard HD STB - non-DVR) but not on the DVRs.<br><br>Does Verizon know about this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050565</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:24:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050469</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br><small>said by skoot :</small><br><br>Still an issue=<br>- Changing channels can still be flakey-- the channel number and program info will change to the desired show but the previous channel's program will still be playing. Happens on my HD STB as well.<br><br> </div><div class="bquote">Ditto - happened to me last night.<br> </div> I just noticed on my 7100 box that, w/1.62, "sometimes" (not always), if you tap the ch down button in about 1 sec increments, the channel actually changes, but the info bar does not, it stays on the previous channel(s) info bar.<br>  It takes at least a few seconds for it to switch/revert to the correct info display, almost until the info bar is ready to dissapear, & never if you are channel surfing.<br>    For Example, if you start at ch. 668 & start tapping down, the info bar for each new channel displays ch 668's, until you stop & sit on a channel for a few seconds, so the box can "figure out" the correct info display.<br>  It happened often enough that I was able to "make it happen" a few times this morning. It also seemed more likley to happen if you haven't changed channels for a while & start surfing fresh.<br> I don't know if my 6416/6200/25xx's  will do this, I haven't had the time to play with them yet.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050469</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:59:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mccla21 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Is the DVR issue with Can not locate network Hub problem fixed with the 1.6.2 upgrade?<br> </div>I have not experienced it once since the update.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050400</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:39:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050376</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><b>mccla21</b></A> : Is the DVR issue with Can not locate network Hub problem fixed with the 1.6.2 upgrade?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050376</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:33:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050261</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : >>Ice, I am sorry but why do you have an HD STB hooked to an SD TV?<br><br>FWIW- I have a SD TV in my bedroom with an HD STB-- with the SD STB I was unable to view any of my HD recorded shows from the HD DVR in the living room-- almost all of my recordings are in HD so it made the Home Media DVR pretty useless.<br><br>Now I can watch all my recordings, all of the channels, and I usually prefer to watch the HD shows letterboxed on the SD TV.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050261</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:40:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050253</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by skoot :</small><br><br>Still an issue=<br>- Changing channels can still be flakey-- the channel number and program info will change to the desired show but the previous channel's program will still be playing. Happens on my HD STB as well.<br><br> </div>Ditto - happened to me last night.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050253</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:37:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050250</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : My impressions after some time has passed with 1.6.2 on my 7216:<br><br>Improvements- <br>- Menus are quicker-- many functions are quicker<br>- Menus are clearer and easier on the eyes<br>- Much less problems with screen resolution changes delays<br>- The broken channel/"Not available"/ 7 second recordings issue has not happened ONCE since the update. This would happen frequently before the update.  I haven't had to reboot once.<br>- I haven't had the skipping/pausing video issues since the update.  Not at all.  Before I would have recordings which would have the video freeze for moments  repeatedly throughout the program, especially on FoxHD.<br><br>Still an issue=<br>- Changing channels can still be flakey-- the channel number and program info will change to the desired show but the previous channel's program will still be playing. Happens on my HD STB as well.<br><br>Overall I'm very happy with the update-- it makes for a much better viewing experience!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050250</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:35:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050194</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Lee GWB <A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Not yet.. That was the first thing I did. I set the HDMI from Component. I am awaiting feedback from here and Home.<br>Lee<br> </div>Thanks Lee! Lets hope they finally got it. Although I have the feeling I'll be disappointed... :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22050194</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:04:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22049010</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1564083"><b>Agent Smith</b></A> : I currently have the 1.60 still dam .. i have the HD-DVR 7216 box and A non DVR but HD 7100 box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22049010</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:23:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048676</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/899744"><b>Belspur</b></A> : You guy's are making me jealous.<br><br>Still patiently waiting is Sarasota, FL ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048676</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:31:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048480</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1370061"><b>klipko</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>And I heard unofficially that trial releases in OR happened yesterday :) (no, I didn't receive it :) )<br> </div>My boxes are reporting 1.6.2.  It happened sometime today.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048480</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:58:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048383</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : All the self-diagnostic tests now read SUCCESSFUL :)<br><br>And... my OOB is now 26db - up from last time I checked (24db). No idea why this would happen.<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048383</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048148</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><b>JohnA</b></A> : Go take a pill, Frank. The Verizon employees that post here are here to help, like 98% of all posters. [MOD EDIT] TEXT REMOVED]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048148</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:02:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048129</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1237414"><b>LimoMan</b></A> : Ahhh, my bad! Sorry about that! ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048129</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:00:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048110</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/366532"><b>icemannyr1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  LimoMan <A HREF="/useremail/u/1237414"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Ice, I am sorry but why do you have an HD STB hooked to an SD TV? Maybe I am missing something but I thought the SD PQ issue was with the HD STBs (62xx series) and HD TVs.<br> </div>I have the HD STBs connected to the SD TVs so I can watch the HD channels letterboxed on my SD TV's. <br>The problem with the soft SD was on any HD or SD TV connected to the HD boxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048110</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:57:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048082</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JPL <A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I think the reason for this is to act as a work-around for some consumer complaints.  I know I'm not the only one to be affected by the STB not turning on when I hit the power button (I grab the remote, go over to the couch, hit power, and only the TV turns on, requiring that I get up off my lazy butt, and hit the power button on the STB).  I think this was an easy way around that.  Now I can just hit 'menu' when that happens and the STB turns on without me having to get up.  I think this is a nice addition, although I think they should have mapped it, instead, to the FiOS TV button in the middle of the remote...<br> </div>But my Harmony remote doesn't have a "FIOS TV" button.  :p<br> </div>I learned that command on my Harmony :)<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22048082</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:53:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047988</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : And then a production fix "unofficially" takes 5 months to "officially" happen  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047988</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:34:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047867</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1577890"><b>ggma1126</b></A> : Just noticed something else - last nite before the upgrade my mrdvr said I had used 28% after the upgrade and reboot it now says 17% guess that's a good thing and I usually refresh the box after deleting shows ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047867</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:14:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047818</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1237414"><b>LimoMan</b></A> : Ice, I am sorry but why do you have an HD STB hooked to an SD TV? Maybe I am missing something but I thought the SD PQ issue was with the HD STBs (62xx series) and HD TVs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047818</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:05:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047755</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/366532"><b>icemannyr1</b></A> : I have two HD boxes connected to SD TVs and the PQ of the SD channels is 100% better. Weather Scan and the music channels look better to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047755</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:54:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047714</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/537531"><b>marathonmike</b></A> : My 1.6.2 installed last night.  This morning the DVR had a screensaver running saying to hit menu to bring the box out of sleep mode.<br><small>--<br>I miss the campaign.  So much drama.  Best series to ever run on TV :-(</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047714</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:48:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047481</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Not yet.. That was the first thing I did. I set the HDMI from Component. I am awaiting feedback from here and Home.<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047481</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:10:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047415</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : So has anyone had the HDMI handshake issue yet with 1.6.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22047415</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:58:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1251487"><b>bwintx</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's unofficially official.  :p<br><br>But let's say the first two rollout dates were dead on.<br> </div>So, when are we folks in VHO1 rumored to be having our lucky day? (Presumably lucky, so far.)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046839</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:27:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046757</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><b>nycdave</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's unofficially official.  :p<br><br>But let's say the first two rollout dates were dead on.<br> </div>The IMG rollout dates are official, until a big issue forces a postponement - luckily the 1.6.2 rollout has been relatively painless...(knock on wood)... ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046757</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:13:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046584</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>There has NEVER been an official rollout schedule for an IMG release.<br> </div>You mean not publicly anyway. Your turn on Thursday Darci, unofficially   ;)<br> </div>And I heard unofficially that trial releases in OR happened yesterday :) (no, I didn't receive it :) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046584</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:42:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046563</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>There has NEVER been an official rollout schedule for an IMG release.<br> </div>You mean not publicly anyway. Your turn on Thursday Darci, unofficially   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046563</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:39:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046562</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's unofficially official.  :p<br><br>But let's say the first two rollout dates were dead on.<br> </div>In that case I look forward to seeing the new SD picture in two weeks! <br><small>--<br><b>When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat. <br>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046562</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:39:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046545</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : It's unofficially official.  :p<br><br>But let's say the first two rollout dates were dead on.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046545</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:36:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046544</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  wifi4milez <A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Is there an official rollout date schedule or is that just what is being reported? <br> </div>There has NEVER been an official rollout schedule for an IMG release.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046544</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:36:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046530</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Sorry Wifi-<br><br>NYC is in 2 weeks (tentatively)<br> </div>Thats annoying. Is there an official rollout date schedule or is that just what is being reported? <br><small>--<br><b>When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat. <br>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046530</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:34:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046517</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Sorry Wifi-<br><br>NYC is in 2 weeks (tentatively)<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046517</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:33:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046516</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1054326"><b>wifi4milez</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  c17chief <A HREF="/useremail/u/547354"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>new image on my boxes now. No difference on the SD box in the bedroom, as expected tho since PQ has always  been fine on it, but on the 6416 in the living room on a 46" Sony LCD...GREATLY improved SD. Previously, nothing I could do would get rid of the overly soft/blurred SD picture. Now it looks about as well as you would expect SD to look on an HD set, and def watchable again. <br><br> </div>Thats awesome news, I hope they upgraded me here in NYC! I will be immediately checking upon my return home from work this afternoon, as the (total crap) SD picture quality on my HD set was/is a HUGE issue for me. <br><small>--<br><b>When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat. <br>-Ronald Reagan-</b><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046516</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:32:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046457</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JPL <A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I think the reason for this is to act as a work-around for some consumer complaints.  I know I'm not the only one to be affected by the STB not turning on when I hit the power button (I grab the remote, go over to the couch, hit power, and only the TV turns on, requiring that I get up off my lazy butt, and hit the power button on the STB).  I think this was an easy way around that.  Now I can just hit 'menu' when that happens and the STB turns on without me having to get up.  I think this is a nice addition, although I think they should have mapped it, instead, to the FiOS TV button in the middle of the remote...<br> </div>But my Harmony remote doesn't have a "FIOS TV" button.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046457</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:23:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046373</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><b>JPL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  ENFiOS <A HREF="/useremail/u/1501603"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>I just found out it has nothing to do with the handshake issue, only to let people know their TV is on and STB is off and out of sync.<br> </div>And I see nothing wrong with that...<br> </div>I think the reason for this is to act as a work-around for some consumer complaints.  I know I'm not the only one to be affected by the STB not turning on when I hit the power button (I grab the remote, go over to the couch, hit power, and only the TV turns on, requiring that I get up off my lazy butt, and hit the power button on the STB).  I think this was an easy way around that.  Now I can just hit 'menu' when that happens and the STB turns on without me having to get up.  I think this is a nice addition, although I think they should have mapped it, instead, to the FiOS TV button in the middle of the remote...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22046373</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:08:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045992</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1501603"><b>ENFiOS</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I just found out it has nothing to do with the handshake issue, only to let people know their TV is on and STB is off and out of sync.<br> </div>And I see nothing wrong with that...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045992</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:58:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045884</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I just found out it has nothing to do with the handshake issue, only to let people know their TV is on and STB is off and out of sync.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045884</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045721</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by bull3964 :</small><br><br>If I were to wager a guess, I would say that the screensaver is a bandaid for HDCP handshaking issues.  By keeping the video output active all the time, they reduce the likelihood that your TV will fail to handshake when it turns on.<br> </div>That's a pretty good point. Does anyone with 1.6.2 notice if they turn their box on if they get a quick jerk in the display anymore which used to signal the handshake? If it doesn't, maybe this guy is right.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045721</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:12:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045705</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : If I were to wager a guess, I would say that the screensaver is a bandaid for HDCP handshaking issues.  By keeping the video output active all the time, they reduce the likelihood that your TV will fail to handshake when it turns on.<br><br>It also will be a nice visual aid for people who don't realize that their TV forgot to turn off.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045705</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:08:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045673</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1572715"><b>ScottE</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>ENFIOS-<br><br>Yes, the screen saver is a new addition. It's slowly growing on me.  :p<br> </div>At first, this seems kind of pointless (what's the point of the Power button, anyway?) but the good news is that it will help when the TV and STB powers are out of sync.  If the TV is on and the STB is 'semi-off', pressing MENU will bring them back to the same mode.  Much easier than fumbling with the device buttons and power button on the remote...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045673</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:01:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045619</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Good observations kslednj, keep us posted. When you turn off the STB, do you still get a few seconds of nothing on the display before the time comes back?<br> </div>Yes.  When I turn off the STB I do get a couple seconds of nothing before the time returns.<br><br>However, after having some more time to go through the settings I found one change that I am very very happy about.  You can now set the display to turn off when the STB is off.  No more bright time displayed when the STB is off!  I can finally remove my makeshift cardboard cutout to block that light at night :)<br><br>As far as the SD PQ on HDTV, it has definitely improved.  Ch 49 Weatherscan looks so much better than before.  And some of the channels that looked so-so this morning have improved, notably TNT SD.<br><br>The remote signals are better as well and the overall speed to navigate the menus etc. have increased with very little lag.<br><br>And I can confirm that the annoying picture bounce I was experiencing when sending the s-video signal to my dvd-recorder is gone.  I watched a 10 minute clip on the recorder through s-video and it was bounce-free.<br><br>Verizon really did a nice job with this IMG upgrade.<br><br>:)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045619</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:54:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Jaw,<br><br>I can't agree with you more. The games are such a waste of time and effort by their staff. There are so many other things they could be addressing.<br><br>If you want games, get a PS3 or xbox 360. And to use a remote control to play a game, it's wierd.<br><br>Fios games, in my book, gets the most "useless feature" award.<br><br>And the widgets should be renamed "uselets".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045486</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:34:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : Yup.  Not the end of the world and certainly worth the potential inconvenience given all the other improvements.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045338</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:05:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045330</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Gotcha, unique situation you have. I'm sure there will be people who won't like this for various reasons. I don't believe there is a way to deactivate it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045330</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:03:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045275</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : I'm sure it will.  My problem, however, is that I have 2 STBs connected to the same TV and control which is used by having one on and one off at a time (and switching the TV input accordingly).  With this new thing, whoever is watching needs to be careful not to hit "menu" or the other STB will turn on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045275</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:55:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045257</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jr461 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Is there a way to disable this?  I don't want the option of "menu" turning the box back on.<br> </div>Won't power bring it back also?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045257</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:52:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045218</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : Yes, the skip and jump back are improved but not perfect.  Definitely livable though.<br><br>When I turn the STB off and leave the TV on, I get a screen saver advising to either hit "menu" to turn the STB back on or turn the TV off.<br><br>Is there a way to disable this?  I don't want the option of "menu" turning the box back on.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045218</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:45:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by kslednj :</small><br><br>Response time on the remote to STB also has gotten better.  It seems faster and hardly misses an input.<br> </div>While playing with 162, the replay and skip are a mixed bag. As I posted last week, it's not COMPLETELY fixed.  I still get STUTTER after about the 4th or 5th repeated skip/replay.  This is an improvement, but still no dice.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22045021</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:06:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044974</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Congrats everyone on the rollout!<br><br>You'll also notice the Games tab has been updated - pointing to future additional offerings..<br> <br></div>I don't understand why VZ even invests a penny into these games.  If I want games trust me, I'll play the Xbox, not 32-bit Motorola STB "games". But I'd love to know what VZ invested into this, even though I don't understand it. Then again...I don't have an MBA! ; )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044974</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:59:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044833</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/547354"><b>c17chief</b></A> : new image on my boxes now. No difference on the SD box in the bedroom, as expected tho since PQ has always  been fine on it, but on the 6416 in the living room on a 46" Sony LCD...GREATLY improved SD. Previously, nothing I could do would get rid of the overly soft/blurred SD picture. Now it looks about as well as you would expect SD to look on an HD set, and def watchable again. <br><br>...and yes, I see the standby text for a split second on screen when shutting everything off. I'm assuming that is what it is anyways....def something there, but havent paid enough attention to it to guess what it says or anything. I dont view that as a problem in the least. If others do for some reason...it's a small price to pay for having SD back. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044833</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044737</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : Just found a new enhancement (haven't seen this one mentioned) that I definitely have to applaud.<br><br>When setting up a manual DVR recording you used to have to up / down to select the channel - a pain to get from channel 190 to say 574.  Now you can also input the channel directly from the numeric keypad.  Nice improvement.<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044737</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:17:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1237414"><b>LimoMan</b></A> : Great update!  First channel I went to was Weatherscan and a huge difference as far as SDQ!  Remote responds much better with no delay that I can see. Will check more after work, good job VZ!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044735</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:17:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044709</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1522086"><b>lets456</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  keyboards <A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by markhil :</small><br><br>Got the update but my SD on my HD tv still doesn't look too good.  What are the best settings on the DVR box for SD ?<br>Overide OFF ?  480i   ? 480 p ?<br><br>Also do I have to reset my Motorola DVR ? Info says I have 1.6.2 <br> </div>Depends on your TV.  My best results are OFF - this outputs SD upconverted by the STB to HD resolution and doesn't cause the delay for resolution switching when going from SD to HD or vice-versa.  I tried the 480i and 480p and there is only a small difference on my Sharp AQUOS. The best setting is whatever your eye perceives as best - try them all and decide.<br> </div>Same here. I tried 480I/P and 1080I (Stretch)...on my RP Hitachi, the differences were very small to none. I though 480I looked a tad better, but i had to flip back and forth about 15-20 times before I came to that conclusion. However taking 15-20 times to find a difference gives an indication that going to 1080I was good for me. Now i do not have to wait for resolution change.<br><br>It also depends greatly on the deinterlacer in your TV. My A650's deinterlacer is much better than my Hitachi.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044709</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:13:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : explain on how to use it. And Turn off the display. I only had 2 cups of coffee as of yet. I can't quite grasp it.<br>:)<br>Lee<br>EDIT<br><br>  I figured out the Display will shut off when you shutoff the box IE "Standby".<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044561</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:43:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044518</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : 1.62 update arrived sometime early this AM. The audio burp appears to be fixed, as reported by others :) All channel logo's seem to be there, too :)<br><br>Can't comment on SD PQ improvement,since I have a 7126. But, it does look as good as it did prior to 1.62 - so, the UG didn't break that.<br><br>All seems well here. I know I will NOT miss the burps!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044518</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044515</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by markhil :</small><br><br>Got the update but my SD on my HD tv still doesn't look too good.  What are the best settings on the DVR box for SD ?<br>Overide OFF ?  480i   ? 480 p ?<br><br>Also do I have to reset my Motorola DVR ? Info says I have 1.6.2 <br> </div>Depends on your TV.  My best results are OFF - this outputs SD upconverted by the STB to HD resolution and doesn't cause the delay for resolution switching when going from SD to HD or vice-versa.  I tried the 480i and 480p and there is only a small difference on my Sharp AQUOS. The best setting is whatever your eye perceives as best - try them all and decide.<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044515</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:33:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044499</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Markhill-<br><br>Honestly, here are the settings for my best SD results on an HDTV:<br><br>SD Override set to STRETCH<br><br>Hooked via Component<br><br>You do not have to reset the DVR - it already did that during the night.  ;)<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044499</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:31:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044488</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Got the update but my SD on my HD tv still doesn't look too good.  What are the best settings on the DVR box for SD ?<br>Overide OFF ?  480i   ? 480 p ?<br><br>Also do I have to reset my Motorola DVR ? Info says I have 1.6.2 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044488</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:28:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044442</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Frank,<br>      It IS better ..Not perfect but from what I can tell from DTV, Time Warner and CV this is "par" for a SD viewing on a HD set.<br>      At work we have DTV and a SD box on a HDTV set. Similar results viening the  World baseball classic.<br>      I think they may have gotten it right.. Give me a few days.<br>Lee<br>    ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044442</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:19:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044412</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : JPL,<br><br>Another channel is is really tough to watch is MSG on channel 78. Either it's IMG 1.6.0, cablevsions Sh*tty, overcompressed feed to Verizon, or both.<br><br>I can't stand watching the Rangers on there.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044412</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:13:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044401</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  keyboards <A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So far so good with the 1.6.2 upgrade.  <br><br>SD PQ is much improved, <br> </div>I am looking forward to deployment here.  My eyes water when I switch back to SD because of the blurr.<br><br>As a side note, the other night my wife started a Sopranos VOD which are all SD since HBO no longer has HD VOD.  Anyway, it looked horrible as always, and I said something to my wife about how it would be nice if HBO reverted back to the HD VOD service they once had.  She said "now how can you tell that's not HD?".]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044401</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044399</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Has everyone rollout dates been upped since OR/WA is due to get it this week also now?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044399</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:12:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044398</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><b>JPL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Someone take a look at weatherscan on ch49 and see if it looks better. That is the real test. That channel is horrible on 1.6.0.<br> </div>Funny thing - that's the channel I use to test SD PQ too.  It was definitely sharper on my TV this morning when I checked.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044398</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:11:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044391</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Someone take a look at weatherscan on ch49 and see if it looks better. That is the real test. That channel is horrible on 1.6.0.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044391</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:10:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044389</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Yep me too Blew me out of Bed. I have a older SD tv in the room having the Box control the Audio..<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044389</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:10:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044382</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : ENFIOS-<br><br>Yes, the screen saver is a new addition. It's slowly growing on me.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044382</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:08:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1501603"><b>ENFiOS</b></A> : Noticed a "screen saver" when first turned TV on and box was off saying to Press MENU to watch TV.  Is that new or just reset itself w/ the update?  In any case I like it because bedroom box is on other side of the wall and this shows when TV is ON and BOX is OFF...alot less confusing for the Mrs.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044379</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:08:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1424194"><b>jr461</b></A> : PQ is MUCH better.  I can watch SD channels again!<br><br>Some channels (BBC for example), as mentioned, are not as good as others but I will chalk this up to the source.  Most however are now very good and entirely watchable.<br><br>Oddly the MLB HD logo is missing while it is there for the SD channel.  Not a big deal, just struck me as odd.<br><br>Speaking of which, seeing how good MLB SD looks, I am encouraged about ordering Extra Innings if those SD channels will look as good as ch 86.<br><br>Skip and jump back are more responsive.<br><br>I briefly checked VOD and it appears that the SD there is still soft/blurry.<br><br>VOD aside, GREAT update!!  :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044334</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:56:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044302</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : So far so good with the 1.6.2 upgrade.  <br><br>SD PQ is much improved, audio compression stayed at light instead of resetting to heavy (HOORAY  :D - my speaker bar says thanks  ;) ), response to commands seems faster, and as of now no noticeable new bugs.<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044302</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:45:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044299</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1522086"><b>lets456</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Good observations kslednj, keep us posted. When you turn off the STB, do you still get a few seconds of nothing on the display before the time comes back?<br> </div>I get "Going to Standby mode" (With the Verizon Logo) for a split second, then it turns off...weird?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044299</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:45:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044294</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1522086"><b>lets456</b></A> : I think the SD has improved and is noticeable on shows such as "fresh Prince", etc on Nick. However, it's not "Earth Shattering", but noticeable.<br><br>The guide and menus seem quicker, which is nice. Also, now I can set everything to "1080I" so I do not have to wait for the box to change resolution. I noticed that 480I and 1080I resolutions have very little to NO difference. Before the update it was apparent that 480I was quite a bit better.<br><br>Oh well, so far so good. However, I only messed around with it for 20-25 minutes today. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044294</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:43:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044070</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> When you turn off the STB, do you still get a few seconds of nothing on the display before the time comes back?<br> </div>Yes - but only a second or two<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044070</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:58:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044038</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Good observations kslednj, keep us posted. When you turn off the STB, do you still get a few seconds of nothing on the display before the time comes back?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044038</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:38:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044031</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : While its still too early to say for sure about the upgrades for the img 1.6.2 a couple things I have noticed so far:<br><br>SD PQ on an HDTV has improved.  I was able to return my sharpness settings to pre-Fios TV figures and they do look much better than before.  While there are a couple channels that do not look as good as others, for the most part it is an improvement.<br><br>Response time on the remote to STB also has gotten better.  It seems faster and hardly misses an input.<br><br>Another thing I noticed is the picture bounce issue I had with recording the s-video signal to my dvd-recorder.  I only did a small sample of about 2 minutes, but I did not see any sort of jitter or shake in the picture.<br><br>I will have to do some more experimenting later on today, but so far I am pleased with the improvements that have been made with this latest IMG upgrade.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044031</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:31:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044021</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Congrats everyone on the rollout!<br><br>Even though i was already at 1.6.2 - I noticed a message in the "Inbox" of the STB this morning, alerting us of the "maintenance update".  ;)<br><br>You'll also notice the Games tab has been updated - pointing to future additional offerings..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044021</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:23:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044001</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1165186"><b>h8verizonDSL</b></A> : Hello,<br><br>STBs updated successfully at 0200 Hrs. Will evaluate SD picture quality using a Pioneer PRO 111FD KURO Elite PDP once its mounted on wall. I am hoping VZ has fixed the "too soft" SD picture issue.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22044001</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:01:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043899</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : It started the D/L at 2:20 AM and took ~5 minutes to complete the transfer.  Then it appeard to be verifying it for another 2 minutes ("EF" and then "FP" appeared on the front panel display of the 6416 until about 02:27).  the front display went dark for another ~2 minutes and then the DVR went through the same set of displays as you get when you do a reboot.<br><br>It's now at Release: 1.6.2, Build Number 08.58<br><br>Starz/Encore SD VOD still looks not too great but I'm beginning to think that that's how it comes from the source.  Other regular SD channels look somewhat crisper, with major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, NBC) having the least improvement.  It's a poor commentary when the local PEG channels are clearer than the commercial ones. :uhh:<br><br>The DVR's response to remote control inputs seems to be more decisive and quick with improvement in the SKIP FWD/REV function.<br><br>Need to do more fooling around when I am less tired.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043899</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:14:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043834</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><b>c64</b></A> : Just got the upgrade in Northwales,pa<br><small>--<br>9929</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043834</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:15:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043824</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : ugh, NNJ, just got the update but my TBSHD and MLBHD have not come back.  its been almost 5 days now since those two channels went down for me. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043824</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:06:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043813</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1576928"><b>sds910</b></A> : Just got the update at 2:19AM in NNJ. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043813</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:53:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043529</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1627720"><b>rbranch</b></A> : Just got FIOS last week with the Motorola 7216 and v1.6.1 and noticed a DVR bug right away.  Have to admit it is pretty annoying to begin watching a game while the DVR is still recording, hit stop to answer the phone, and then have the DVR return to the live action asking whether it should continue the recording.  It pretty much ruins a lot of the game since you find out the score.<br><br>So, this defect is not being addressed in v1.6.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043529</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:52:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Rattler-<br><br>You'll be fine - you'll probably here the STB "click" between 3-4am....<br> </div>Jeep!<br><br>Ya mean I can reprogram to record one of those soft-core HD titles on the Maximum Sin channels at around 3 - 4 AM without losing a single "Oh yeah!", moan or wheeze during the IMG D/L!? :D<br><br>J/K!  Am looking forward to playing around with the new IMG to see if it's improved Encore's SD VOD.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22043466</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22042678</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : So far still the same, but if they moved one forward, why not more? I'm trying to find out.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22042678</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:27:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22042670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Philly is tomorrow and now OR/WA got moved up to 3/12<br> </div>there probably isn't this good news for those of us languishing in L.A., right? <br><br>Still mid-April? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22042670</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:26:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041960</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1577890"><b>ggma1126</b></A> : matcarl<br><br>thanks - the last upgrade i wasn't shutting it down was always leaving on but over the last couple of months i began shutting down to make better use of dvr timewise - had a senior moment there (lol)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041960</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:11:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041944</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Doesn't need to be on]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041944</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:07:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041931</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1577890"><b>ggma1126</b></A> : remind me does the box have to be on to get the upgrade as i  usually leave it off so that I get better use of the dvr timewise]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041931</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:05:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041927</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I guess you always have to check that until they fix it where resets leave your settings alone.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041927</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 19:04:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041827</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/315084"><b>keyboards</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Philly is tomorrow and now OR/WA got moved up to 3/12<br> </div>Thanks.  Looking forward to <b><i>hopefully</b></i> better SD quality.  Do I need to pay attention to the audio compression level - the last time my box was reset it reverted to HEAVY and almost blew out the speaker bar on my set  :o<br><small>--<br>REMEMBER: Stupidity should be painful !!</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041827</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:44:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041665</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Rattler-<br><br>You'll be fine - you'll probably here the STB "click" between 3-4am....<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041665</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:09:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041643</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Philly is tomorrow and now OR/WA got moved up to 3/12<br> </div>Sounds like it would NOT be a very good idea to schedule any overnight recordings in VHO8 (Philly), tonight. ;)<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041643</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:03:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041542</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>and now OR/WA got moved up to 3/12<br> </div>Suuuure ;) :D (as always, thanks for passing on the inf :) )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041542</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:43:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041433</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Philly is tomorrow and now OR/WA got moved up to 3/12]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22041433</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:25:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22040517</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Let's just say Oregon & Washington could look forward to next week.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22040517</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:57:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22040506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jammmin <A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Can someone explain to me again what is the big secret surrounding the release dates of the new IMG 1.6.2? <br> </div>IMG release dates have NEVER been officially announced, it's always been *nudge* *nudge* *wink* *wink* leaked info. And half the time, the schedules would be out of date before all areas were were deployed because things would change internally.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22040506</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:56:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039621</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : Can someone explain to me again what is the big secret surrounding the release dates of the new IMG 1.6.2?  <br><br>The only thing I really care about in the new IMG is fixing the poor SD picture quality on an  HDTV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039621</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:14:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can someone still on 160 please try this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039565</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Biggie-<br>It's a known issue with 1.6.0 - it will be fixed with 1.6.2<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039565</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:03:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Can someone still on 160 please try this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/567051"><b>BiggieB</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Jaydee   :</small><br><br>I really want to know if I'm the only one who has this issue.<br><br>Record anything from Hist HD on your 7216 DVR, and try to play it back on a remote 7100 HD STB and see if it pauses for a 1/4 second, every 2 seconds.. making the remote playback unwatchable.<br><br>I've not heard anyone else describe this problem and I'm trying to figure out if I should call VZ and open a ticket on this one, or if it's a common issue with IMG 160 on the 7216/7100.<br><br>Thanks in advance.<br> </div>I have had this problem since I got FIOS last October.  I like to watch The Universe and can't in HD.  I have had a tech out and all the signals are fine.  This past weekend I moved into a different apart and FIOS ran ALL NEW cables and wires and the signals are perfect yet I STILL can't watch Hist HD with out the constant pauses.  You are not alone.<br><br>BTW - this is happening on my 7216 DVR 1.6.0. it's self and not streaming to a remote box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039338</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:27:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039265</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/559512"><b>AVITWeb</b></A> : Frank...how do I get my hands on a 7100? :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039265</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:11:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039243</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1279692"><b>VZ_Frank</b></A> : Jaw2012,<br><br>I appreciate the feedback and I regularly read the posts on DSLReports.  I will do my best to comment here when I can.<br><br>BTW. We updated the server configurations to NJ/Philly/DE in order to address the logo changes for IMG1.62.<br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Frank]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22039243</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:07:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Can someone still on 160 please try this</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22035352</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I really want to know if I'm the only one who has this issue.<br><br>Record anything from Hist HD on your 7216 DVR, and try to play it back on a remote 7100 HD STB and see if it pauses for a 1/4 second, every 2 seconds.. making the remote playback unwatchable.<br><br>I've not heard anyone else describe this problem and I'm trying to figure out if I should call VZ and open a ticket on this one, or if it's a common issue with IMG 160 on the 7216/7100.<br><br>Thanks in advance.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22035352</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 14:10:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22034379</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1474562"><b>Mark F</b></A> : Maybe that's it, most of us only have 1.6.0 And besides, there is no video tab on the Media Manager software, even though I supposedly have the lateest version via an upgrade last week. <br><br>Also, it mentions playback of videos, but not acquisition of videos, nor what constitutes a video- CBS has every Star Trek epsisode on Youtube, among other shows. Plus, MGM has full-length movies there, as well. <br><br>But, having to download such content not only takes time but uses up HD space. Streaming better in that regard. <br><br>Still, maybe all that will come with the 1.6.2 IMG update.  Hopefully, direct streaming of content from other sites, like Hulu, will we made available in the near future.<br>Mark F.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22034379</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 09:48:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22033543</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Another thing I noticed is I can now stream You Tube videos via Media Manager (on a PC) to the DVR.<br><br>1.6.1 didn't allow me to do this so maybe 1.6.2 has the capability.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22033543</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 23:57:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032673</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Exactly.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JPL <A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JayMan 007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br><br>4. Down click while watching TV only shows current channel no longer flanked by adjacent lower upper channel.<br></div>So is this more like the ok button or the info button?<br> </div>If I understand this right, it's not the same as the info/ok buttons.  This would give you a mini-guide.  Today, under 1.6.0, if I do this, I get a mini-guide that has three channels - the current channel, plus the one before and the one after it.  It takes up way too much of the screen.  It sounds like this change eliminates all but the current channel, giving you a one-channel mini-guide.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032673</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:07:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032670</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1450859"><b>JPL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JayMan 007 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br><br>4. Down click while watching TV only shows current channel no longer flanked by adjacent lower upper channel.<br></div>So is this more like the ok button or the info button?<br> </div>If I understand this right, it's not the same as the info/ok buttons.  This would give you a mini-guide.  Today, under 1.6.0, if I do this, I get a mini-guide that has three channels - the current channel, plus the one before and the one after it.  It takes up way too much of the screen.  It sounds like this change eliminates all but the current channel, giving you a one-channel mini-guide.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032670</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:06:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032659</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br><br>4. Down click while watching TV only shows current channel no longer flanked by adjacent lower upper channel.<br></div>So is this more like the ok button or the info button?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032659</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:04:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Is this fixed in  1.6.2?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032646</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : I'm not sure if ALL these playback/stutter issues are somehow related.  I have 1.6 and I get video stutter on some but not all Live HD channels, but it occurs MUCH MORE with recordings. I tend to think all these playback issues are somehow related.  Maybe not, but I really, REALLY hope they got this resolved in 1.6.2 (along with "CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE)" ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032646</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:01:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is this fixed in  1.6.2?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032435</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I discovered something new yesterday.<br><br>I tried to watch a Hist HD DVR (7216) recording of "The Universe" from a couple weeks ago on the STB in my bedroom (7100).<br><br>I could not watch it at all. It consistently pauses for 1/4 second EVERY 3 seconds or so, and NEVER "stabilizes"- <b>UNWATCHABLE</b>. The same occurs on the 7100 in my den.<br><br>The only place it plays smoothly is on the 7216 itself. Absolutely no problem there. I made new recordings from Hist HD just to check and the situation still occurs. I rebooted all the boxes just in case, no difference.<br><br><i>This is NOT the same issue</i> that occurs when playing back Live TV or DVR recordings from Fox HD affiliates (et. al.), where the video freezes for 2 seconds AND the audio continues without hiccup. That issue ONLY occurs on the 7216 itself and NOT when using remote DVR playback. Also <b>UNWATCHABLE</b>.(That BTW is IMHO the MAJOR <strike>problem</strike> disaster with 1.6.0 and should've been addressed as an emergency IMMEDIATE rolllout, and not a long, slow-paced careful rollout as is occurring here.. in fact, whichever IMG update caused that NEVER should've been allowed out of the laboratory like that, but that's another issue.)<br><br><b>Is anyone familiar with the Hist HD "remote playback" issue I'm describing here on 1.6.0?</b> And please can anyone tell me whether that has been fixed or not with 1.6.2?<br><br>paying for a remote dvr which, for a large chunk of channels-- doesn't work here, doesn't work there..<br>grumble....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032435</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 19:11:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032377</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Gave both the 2500's a reset from the Verizon web site.  Logo's are now all in and correct.  <br><br>Once caveat on the 2500's is they don't show Logo's as you change channels.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nascar-<br><br>Nope - I'm seeing them on all 3 of my STB's now. <br><br>7216, 7100 and 2500. <br><br>You may have to give them a reboot. I had to do that to all of them to clear out the memory.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032377</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:57:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032356</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  VZ_Frank <A HREF="/useremail/u/1279692"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>All,<br><br>A small number of people in NJ/Philly/DE have gotten the IMG 1.62 release in advance of the full deployment as part of a trial Verizon is conducting.  The nature of that early deployment to those customers has caused the logos for those with IMG 1.62 to be out of sync with the configuration on our network servers.  The network servers are configured to support IMG 1.6b &#150; the current production release in those areas.  Only those customers with the early release of IMG 1.62 will see some of their logos mismatched as a result.  This will be automatically corrected for them once IMG 1.62 is deployed to all customers in NJ/Philly/DE next week.  Please keep in mind those customers in Harrisburg and Buffalo &#150; running IMG 1.62 as the production release, are not reporting this logo issue.  <br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Frank<br> </div>Frank, Thank you for coming by and informing us on the situation.  Please go back and tell management we love to hear directly from Verizon.  Even though we may ask a lot, we all know Verizon can't always divulge information on everything we ask for.  But in the future when it's appropriate, please keep the lines of communication open. We really do appreciate it!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032356</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:51:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032350</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : If VHO 5 changes in Staten Island for the update date of 3/24, let me know thanks. I see the dates are subject to change,. shope its sooner than 3/24. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032350</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:49:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032318</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nascar-<br><br>They must've updated something out of my VHO as well now - all logos are coming in...it's almost interesting to find out what the logo looks like!<br><br>NHL Center Ice channels, all the Premium HD's, Bravo HD, etc..<br><br>This is a great firmware release.<br> </div>It's hilarious that we're excited about having icons that actually show up and correspond to it's channel correctly. What does that say? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032318</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:39:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032241</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1359302"><b>Gerryex</b></A> : Hi ALL,<br><br>Is there a list of when all the VHO's will get it.  I've seen some posts for specific VHOs but not a complete list.  I'm in Tampa FL, and I believe I'm VHO 2 and I'm not sure when I'm supposed to get the update.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Gerry]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032241</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:23:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032181</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Nascar-<br><br>Nope - I'm seeing them on all 3 of my STB's now. <br><br>7216, 7100 and 2500. <br><br>You may have to give them a reboot. I had to do that to all of them to clear out the memory.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032181</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:05:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032113</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Do you have any 2500 boxes? Looks like the Logo's are only on my 6416.<br><br>Yeah I went through every channel one at a time to see them all.  :D  Very cool!<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nascar-<br><br>They must've updated something out of my VHO as well now - all logos are coming in...it's almost interesting to find out what the logo looks like!<br><br>NHL Center Ice channels, all the Premium HD's, Bravo HD, etc..<br><br>This is a great firmware release.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22032113</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:46:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Logos</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22031808</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Nascar-<br><br>They must've updated something out of my VHO as well now - all logos are coming in...it's almost interesting to find out what the logo looks like!<br><br>NHL Center Ice channels, all the Premium HD's, Bravo HD, etc..<br><br>This is a great firmware release.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22031808</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:20:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030713</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Thanks!<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nascar-<br><br>Odd that your logo's got fixed. Still a mess here in DE - but I've known the reason why for a couple weeks now.<br><br>I also agree with your 1.6.2 assessment. Nice summary.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030713</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:32:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030685</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : There is a search function also.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030685</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:25:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030661</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1466481"><b>sh9168</b></A> : Ok I can't read thru all 17 pages. Quick question. When does Massachusetts get 1.62? thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030661</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:20:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030484</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Nascar-<br><br>Odd that your logo's got fixed. Still a mess here in DE - but I've known the reason why for a couple weeks now.<br><br>I also agree with your 1.6.2 assessment. Nice summary.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22030484</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 10:39:10 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22029061</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Wow, I wonder how it got corrected already. Sounds good, I can't wait to get it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22029061</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:46:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22029054</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Looks like only a few (6 or 7) channels don't have a logo.  Everything matches correctly now.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br><br>8. Additional channel Logos.<br><br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22029054</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 22:44:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22028400</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1148756"><b>Kyusaku</b></A> : Has anyone tested the new IMG to see if it's possible to access FIOS TV Central while using a third-party router?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22028400</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:22:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027635</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Thanks for clearing that up Rattler, I misread, he did say menu, I thought it was the guide.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027635</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:38:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027556</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : It does.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Rattler <A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If nascar could try the left arrow when at the left edge of the Guide grid he may find that the little pop-up menu still appears.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027556</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:26:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027479</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Correct, but remember when you used to left click you got a little submenu?<br> </div>I think he means when you are in the Menu, not the Guide grid itself.  Under 1.6.0, if you are in the Menu and hit the left arrow button, nothing happens, so to back out of the Menu, you have to hit the Exit button.<br><br>If nascar could try the left arrow when at the left edge of the Guide grid he may find that the little pop-up menu still appears.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22027479</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:12:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22026367</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : I don't recall (I could be wrong) a sub menu by clicking left in the Menu.  There is a sub menu in the Guide when you click left.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Correct, but remember when you used to left click you got a little submenu?<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22026367</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:16:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Correct, but remember when you used to left click you got a little submenu?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025871</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:54:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025803</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : When you hit Menu on 1.6.1 you have to hit Exit to get out of it.  In 1.6.2 you can left click out of it.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br>Can click left out of Menu back to Live TV.<br> </div>So you no longer get that short menu with screen options anymore?<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025803</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:41:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025767</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>IMG 1.6.2 Buld: 8.58 observances:<br>Can click left out of Menu back to Live TV.<br> </div>So you no longer get that short menu with screen options anymore?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025767</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:35:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : IMG 1.6.2 Build: 8.58 observances:<br><br>1. Can click left out of Menu back to Live TV.<br><br>2. Recordings now show Quantity.  Example: Survivor(3) <br><br>3. The tearing bouncing going in and out of menus is fixed.<br><br>4. Down click while watching TV only shows current channel no longer flanked by adjacent lower upper channel.<br><br>5. Multi Room DVR - Remote STB has Diagnostic info.<br><br>6. You can disable Modes.<br><br>6. Multi Room DVR - Remote STB's FF, REW, Pause, and Play work as they should.  No longer does the remote STB lose the place where it was coming out of FF.<br><br>7. STB TV out of sync message.  TV on but the STB is off.  Press Menu to turn the STB on.<br><br>8. Additional channel Logos.<br><br>9. Skip reverse hiccup on consecutive clicks is better but not completely fixed.<br><br>10. Screen blacking or data lag on "Scheduled Recordings" is fixed.<br><br>11. "What is Hot" is now in the DVR menu<br><br>12. The word "Protect" is no longer used on saved recordings.  It now matches the Series Recording verbiage: "Until space is needed" and "Until I delete".<br><br>13. I can now stream You Tube video to the DVR via the Media Manager software loaded on a PC.<br><br>Overall the DVR feels more stable and robust.<br><br>The SD picture issue seems better but the "slider" may be the solution since what looks good to person A may not to person B.<br><br>If I come across anything else I'll post it.<br><br>EDIT: Added #12 & #13.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22025742</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:30:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024808</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Excellent!<br><br>Thanks Frank!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024808</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:53:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024600</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Thanks for the reply Frank. I hadn't read Nascar's post from last evening or I could've cleared it up too.  :p<br><br>The good thing is that we should be seeing at least some new logos - I've noticed FX HD as one of them.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024600</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 09:05:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024520</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1279692"><b>VZ_Frank</b></A> : All,<br><br>A small number of people in NJ/Philly/DE have gotten the IMG 1.62 release in advance of the full deployment as part of a trial Verizon is conducting.  The nature of that early deployment to those customers has caused the logos for those with IMG 1.62 to be out of sync with the configuration on our network servers.  The network servers are configured to support IMG 1.6b &#150; the current production release in those areas.  Only those customers with the early release of IMG 1.62 will see some of their logos mismatched as a result.  This will be automatically corrected for them once IMG 1.62 is deployed to all customers in NJ/Philly/DE next week.  Please keep in mind those customers in Harrisburg and Buffalo &#150; running IMG 1.62 as the production release, are not reporting this logo issue.  <br><br>Thanks,<br><br>Frank]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22024520</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:47:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22023120</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><b>OwlSaver</b></A> : This sounds so much like the bad old days when you could only get your phone from AT&T. Change was slow, there were few choices, and they were built to AT&T's specifications, not the end users needs.<br><br>The cable companies should get out of the STB business. It sounds like it make take legal action to make this happen. Oh well.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22023120</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:34:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022881</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Don't worry.  I did. And I will follow up in the morning.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Both of you should report this.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022881</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:51:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022875</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Both of you should report this.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022875</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:49:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022827</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : I don't think it is anywhere near half but MLB has an "abc" logo.  C-Span 2 has "Black Family".  C-Span 3 has I don't know, can't read it.  Fox Sports Central 301 has the "Military Logo".<br><br>Overall seems like more logos, but yes some are incorrect.  <br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  rpjoe <A HREF="/useremail/u/1488971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>now half of the channel logos are are the wrong channel after the update this morning lol. i must say though, the sd looks so much better.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022827</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:42:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022742</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  rpjoe <A HREF="/useremail/u/1488971"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>now half of the channel logos are are the wrong channel after the update this morning lol. i must say though, the sd looks so much better.<br> </div>What do you mean? They logos are showing the wrong channel? Give an example. Also since you got it early, you must be on the beta list, so call it in.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022742</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:30:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022726</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by hellfire :</small><br><br>Let me ask this. ....<br>If I record a program in SD prior to the img release and then play it back after the update, will it be altered or of the low quality like prior to the upgrade? Curious if I can make a before/after comparison. :uhh:<br> </div>The recording I was told is not affected, it's the playback. Anything you record while on 1.6.0 will look better on 1.6.2 in SD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022726</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 21:29:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022532</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1488971"><b>rpjoe</b></A> : now half of the channel logos are are the wrong channel after the update this morning lol. i must say though, the sd looks so much better.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22022532</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:54:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021905</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Let me ask this. ....<br>If I record a program in SD prior to the img release and then play it back after the update, will it be altered or of the low quality like prior to the upgrade? Curious if I can make a before/after comparison. :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021905</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:07:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021811</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : I heard my DVR reboot downstairs this afternoon. Like a little child on Christmas morning, I ran down to see if there was a present waiting for me.<br><br>Sadly - no :(<br><br>I have no idea why it did that, other than to tease me.<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021811</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 18:51:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021300</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : well Im getting FIOS TV back on 3/11. When I had it Aug-Oct I had both 1.5 and 1.6 and it was pretty bad on the HD Set for SD Quality. Hoping on 3/24 for SI NY the upgrades to the SD Qulaity on my HD Sets. 3/24 is when SI NY is getting the 1.6.2 update Im told, VHO 5 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021300</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:23:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021274</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/163824"><b>SparkChaser</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Billy Bob <A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>why is there mixed reviews on the 1.6.2 fixed SD quality, like why is bad for some and good for some ? Isnt it the same update for FIOS Subsribers? </div>The picture quality is subjective. You will find opions all over the place. Additionally, the SD quality was extremely good before they "fixed it" a couple of revs ago. Some won't be satisfied until it is the same as it was (or at least their memory of what it was)<br><small>--<br>"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." - Aldous Huxley <br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021274</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:18:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : why is there mixed reviews on the 1.6.2 fixed SD quality, like why is bad for some and good for some ? Isnt it the same update for FIOS Subsribers? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021206</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:06:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021100</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : I am looking forward to 1.6.2 and updates there after. I am also hoping FiOS is finally starting to get there software acts together. In 3.3 years i am on my 7th 6416 series STB, have had 1 7216 and am on my 3rd QIP2500. Reliable is not a word i can associate with a Motorola STB<br>Just in case i bought a Tivo :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021100</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:49:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021060</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jaw,<br><br>No offense but you have a rather naive view of how the cable business works. For the most part its not the STB's hardware that cannot handle features that you want so much or think you are entitled to get but its a software that rides on them. As I have said before Motorola, SA/Cisco, Samsung, etc. are able to build whatever a MSO want. The question you should be asking is why the features you want are not part of Verizon's, Comcast's, etc. requirements. The MSO's specify the feature set and capabilities of set-tops that are deployed on their network and a vendor builds a box to those specs not the other way around. Sure other vendors are chomping at the bit to sell boxes to Verizon but take my word that they won't be any different in any of their features because again they will be customized to Verizon's requirements.<br> </div>What are you talking about?  Did you not read my post?  I said VZ has skimped out on features. I even said I would be willing to pay extra for some of the features that are incorporated in other similar boxes.  When you have arguably the most advanced, cutting edge network, why skimp on the box? <br><br>But the reason I'm lobbying for a different vendor is because these Motorola boxes are unreliable.  I base this on my years with Comcast and Verizon, as well as reports all over the web regarding Moto boxes. <br><br>But this may all be mute if the Moxi STB added support for Fios VOD.  If that happens I'm picking up a Moxi and dumping the bubbly Motorola.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021060</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:42:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021016</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/163824"><b>SparkChaser</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  stevec325 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>How does this relate to 1.6.2?<br><br>These releases do more than just provide the customer with "new features" and fix bugs. They (in theory design) are to provide the sweet spot in delivery. Meaning, giving the customer what they will be satisfied with, at the lowest possible investment. The sweet spot comes into play when you understand that a major goal of support is to NEVER, EVER over-deliver.<br><br>It costs serious money to push out these updates. The ROI is carefully understood, BEFORE they are funded. A major goal is to reduce/eliminate as many service (phone/truck roll) calls as possible. That's how they are paid for.<br><br>And, that's how features, bug fixes and enhancements are prioritized. You might not like it - but, that's how it is. Try to remember, they view this as a f"or profit" business. Their sweet spot is the typical American TV watching family of 2.2 kids and a dog. The questions that are asked are all around "What will they bear in terms of features, price and quality". Figure out the sweet spot and your ROI (net profit) soars. Get it wrong and OPEX destroys your margin.<br><br>Verizon is among the best in getting it right! </div>Keeping my mouth shut, staying on topic. :p<br><br>I was hoping to get it last night but no luck, I guess I have to wait until next week. Sounding pretty good, so far. :)<br><small>--<br>"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." - Aldous Huxley <br><br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22021016</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:35:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22020938</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Onedollar <A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  carljanderso <A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Onedollar <A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>*wink* new stb incoming<br> </div>Tease. <br><br>and I am pretty sure VHO3 won't see it until about 18 months after it is released. <br> </div>This is not a tease about the new Stb. Select areas will see a new box soon. That is all i have<br> </div>Anything to backup this announcement with?  <br><br>If this is true (which i don't), I so hope it's anything but Moto boxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22020938</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:22:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019927</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : Another design criteria is the impact on service costs. By excluding "features" the provider is able to limit the breadth and depth of what they must deliver in the way of support.<br><br>Trust me, they have this down to a refined science. Each call, the amount of time spent on that call, the infrastructure behind providing support for that call - is understood and the impact is weighed.<br><br>Also considering the added hardware costs... example "native pass-through mode"... the design costs added to the LSI array costs added to the firmware design costs are then added to overall cost of delivery. While the hardware (LSI) may be pennies more in material cost, when coupled with the cost of circuit design, layout and fab changes - it could end up being (SWAG) about $1 more.<br><br>Looking at gross profit as a result of a "cost +" methodology, V* may have to recover up to $10 in gross receipts to show a net profit after OPEX is removed. This in turn would drive them to price it at a price point where their marketing research indicates a LOWER customer capture rate. This degrading downward spiral would force even more OPEX reduction or an increase to top line revenue - to meet profit needs.<br><br>It's significantly more complex than just "provide the feature".<br><br>How does this relate to 1.6.2?<br><br>These releases do more than just provide the customer with "new features" and fix bugs. They (in theory design) are to provide the sweet spot in delivery. Meaning, giving the customer what they will be satisfied with, at the lowest possible investment. The sweet spot comes into play when you understand that a major goal of support is to NEVER, EVER over-deliver.<br><br>It costs serious money to push out these updates. The ROI is carefully understood, BEFORE they are funded. A major goal is to reduce/eliminate as many service (phone/truck roll) calls as possible. That's how they are paid for.<br><br>And, that's how features, bug fixes and enhancements are prioritized. You might not like it - but, that's how it is. Try to remember, they view this as a f"or profit" business. Their sweet spot is the typical American TV watching family of 2.2 kids and a dog. The questions that are asked are all around "What will they bear in terms of features, price and quality". Figure out the sweet spot and your ROI (net profit) soars. Get it wrong and OPEX destroys your margin.<br><br>Verizon is among the best in getting it right!<br>(rant off)<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019927</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:51:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019666</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : Jaw,<br><br>No offense but you have a rather naive view of how the cable business works. For the most part its not the STB's hardware that cannot handle features that you want so much or think you are entitled to get but its a software that rides on them. As I have said before Motorola, SA/Cisco, Samsung, etc. are able to build whatever a MSO want. The question you should be asking is why the features you want are not part of Verizon's, Comcast's, etc. requirements. The MSO's specify the feature set and capabilities of set-tops that are deployed on their network and a vendor builds a box to those specs not the other way around. Sure other vendors are chomping at the bit to sell boxes to Verizon but take my word that they won't be any different in any of their features because again they will be customized to Verizon's requirements.<br><small>--<br>xela19115</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019666</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:11:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019649</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><b>Onedollar</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  carljanderso <A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Onedollar <A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>*wink* new stb incoming<br> </div>Tease. <br><br>and I am pretty sure VHO3 won't see it until about 18 months after it is released. <br> </div>This is not a tease about the new Stb. Select areas will see a new box soon. That is all i have]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 13:08:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019506</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : I am curious also!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019506</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:47:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019184</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : LOL Thx]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019184</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:57:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019170</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Correct!  :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019170</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:56:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019166</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Who's the other STB maker? SA/Cisco? <br></div>Lets see..Samsung, LG, Pace Micro, ADB, Amino, Irdeto, Widevine and the list goes on.  They all would die to create a STB for Fios.  <br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If they were so good why hasn't Verizon picked them instead of Motorola. <br></div> <br><br>VZ did'nt pick them first and foremost because of price.  Moto can pump these antiquated "bubble" set tops out relativivly cheap.  Also when Fios was initially launched, the STB  market was limited.  Fios was just getting off the ground so the contract's volume was rather small.  It was'nt entiely worth it to other vendors to create a platform for Fios. But Motorola being a more Mature STB vendor had the resources and structure to create a STB for the Fios platform and do it cheap.  <br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You have to understand that you have extremely high expectations of what STB should be like. <br> </div>If I'm paying for the box, I expect it to be reliable and have certain features that other boxes have.  Resolution pass-thru, 16x9 guide support, and high(er) capacity hard drive support are just some of the features I believe a network of Fios's excellence should have, period.<br><br><b>If you have a Ferrari, you don't skimp on the accessories!</b> I would be willing to pay a little extra if he box supports these features.  Just give us the option!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019166</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:56:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019158</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : MAtt,<br>    Don't want to sound like a brat but is it safe to say if someone did not get it yet they won't, until Tuesday :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22019158</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:55:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018899</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : All of NYC/LI/Westchester is the same VHO5]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018899</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:10:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018876</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1072064"><b>Sympathy</b></A> : Anyone know what the VHO number is here? Are we in the same as NYC or Westchester/Rockland?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018876</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:06:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018861</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Onedollar <A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>*wink* new stb incoming<br> </div>Tease. <br><br>and I am pretty sure VHO3 won't see it until about 18 months after it is released. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018861</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:02:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/394432"><b>RolteC</b></A> : I wonder when queens VHO05 Is going to be updated?<br><br>We are still at 1.6.0 as I just checked.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:52:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018461</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590476"><b>Mtaz</b></A> : Thank you Sir!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018461</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:42:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018458</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Sorry ... I read the post here.,, I'll reboot see it the boxes get it ..They are such a tease LOL<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018458</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:42:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018410</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Release date for Vho-11/Pittsburgh, Pa? Tanks! :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018410</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:34:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : MTaz-<br><br>vho 1 &#150; Carrolton, TX<br>vho 2 &#150; Temple Terrace, FL<br>vho 3 &#150; Pomona, CA<br>vho 4 &#150; Silver Spring, MD<br>vho 5 &#150; Queens, NY<br>vho 6 &#150; Burlington, MA (Includes RI)<br>vho 7 &#150; Freehold, NJ (Northern NJ)<br>vho 8 &#150; Philadelphia, PA (SE PA / DE / Southern NJ)<br>vho 9 &#150; Richmond, VA<br>vho9a &#150; Norfolk, VA<br>vho10 &#150; Ft. Wayne, IN<br>vho11 &#150; Pittsburgh, PA<br>vho12 &#150; Portland, OR<br>vho13 - Seattle<br>vho14 - Harrisburg, PA<br>vho15 - Buffalo, NY<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018403</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:33:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018372</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/470406"><b>Zimfie</b></A> : Heard the box rebooting at about 4 this morning, received upgrade, didn't get a chance to check it out.  Piture looked a little better though.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018372</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:25:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018367</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : Sadly, I was not one of the chosen few.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018367</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:25:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018366</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590476"><b>Mtaz</b></A> : Right on Matt thanks for the update. If it is not to much trouble is there a thread that gives all the VHO X data, ie what VHO is related to what area? I need to keep this data local so I know what you all are talking about when you ref it...<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018366</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:25:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018100</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Mtaz-<br><br>Today is a "soft launch" out of VHO's 7 & 8. They are sending out to only a few people that were pre-selected (hence my "lucky" comment). This will be the drill for each area as the rollouts continue.<br><br>I actually had my other two STB's (7100 & 2500) updated overnight.  ;)<br><br>Everyone else out of these two VHO's will go on Tuesday (3/10).<br><br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018100</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:30:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018003</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1590476"><b>Mtaz</b></A> : Someone posted a new thread about NNJ getting the upgrade. But after checking here I am still 1.6, Like Matt said they must have been lucky...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22018003</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:55:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22016763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  DGGSLF <A HREF="/useremail/u/1452821"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>What about Massachusetts? Anyone know a target date for the roll out in this area?<br> </div>3/24 but subject to change.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22016763</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:26:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22016385</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1452821"><b>DGGSLF</b></A> : What about Massachusetts? Anyone know a target date for the roll out in this area?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22016385</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:21:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22015096</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SparkChaser <A HREF="/useremail/u/163824"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If they were so good why hasn't Verizon picked them instead of Motorola.  </div>Lowest bidder?  :hmm:<br> </div>Maybe, but that alone does not get the boxes deployed. They actually have to work.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22015096</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:59:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22015063</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/163824"><b>SparkChaser</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If they were so good why hasn't Verizon picked them instead of Motorola.  </div>Lowest bidder?  :hmm:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22015063</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:52:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014921</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That is one of the reasons I think Motorola's STBs suck.  They have such a diverse product catalog.  Instead of producing few products really well, Moto produces a lot of products OK. <br><br>It's a fallacy to think that another STB maker couldn't do a better job creating a MoCa/IP/QAM STB. Any contract that VZ would award would certainly be in any STB maker's interest to create a platform customized for the Fios platform. Your talking at least a billion dollar contract to the maker who can do better than Moto.  And that can't be too hard.</div>Who's the other STB maker? SA/Cisco? If they were so good why hasn't Verizon picked them instead of Motorola. You have to understand that you have extremelly high expectations of what STB should be like. And Motorola, SA, whomever else can build such uber-STB but the cost will be so high that no MSO will buy it. So there is always a trade-off between the cost and feature set. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014921</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:30:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014803</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  SQUIDWARD360 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  mccla21 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Anyone have a date for when the 1.6.2 upgrade will come to MD.  If it is in an earlier part of the thread I apologize I didnt see it<br> </div>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,21988108?hilite=silver+spring">Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</A><br> </div>What about VHO9 (Richmond) & VHO9a (Hampton Roads)?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014803</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 17:10:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014453</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  blue_trooper <A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  OwlSaver <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</small><br><br>I actually think that Verizon (and all Cable/TelcoTV companies) should get out of the STB business. They should leave it to the Consumer Electronics companies.  </div>Isn't Motorola a "consumer electronics company"?<br> </div>No, not exactly. Motorola does not sell set-tops in retail. Only things that can be purchased in retail with a Motorola logo are the cell phones, cable modems and navigation systems.<br> </div>That is one of the reasons I think Motorola's STBs suck.  They have such a diverse product catalog.  Instead of producing few products really well, Moto produces a lot of products OK. <br><br>It's a fallacy to think that another STB maker couldn't do a better job creating a MoCa/IP/QAM STB. Any contract that VZ would award would certainly be in any STB maker's interest to create a platform customized for the Fios platform. Your talking at least a billion dollar contract to the maker who can do better than Moto.  And that can't be too hard. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014453</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:14:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014289</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  OwlSaver <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I actually think that Verizon (and all Cable/TelcoTV companies) should get out of the STB business. They should leave it to the Consumer Electronics companies. Why should we only be able to get our STB from one company? I know Tivo is a choice but we should have more choices.<br> </div>That's an easy one to answer: REVENUE.<br><br>How much more do you imagine V* makes by renting a DVR for $15/month vs. a) selling it for $300 or b) letting you use your own?<br><br>STB's/DVR's are cash cows for all the providers. <br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22014289</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:48:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013388</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><b>mccla21</b></A> : Got it Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013388</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:27:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013364</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1558091"><b>SQUIDWARD360</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mccla21 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anyone have a date for when the 1.6.2 upgrade will come to MD.  If it is in an earlier part of the thread I apologize I didnt see it<br> </div>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,21988108?hilite=silver+spring">Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013364</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:24:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013334</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  blue_trooper <A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  OwlSaver <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>I actually think that Verizon (and all Cable/TelcoTV companies) should get out of the STB business. They should leave it to the Consumer Electronics companies.  </div>Isn't Motorola a "consumer electronics company"?<br> </div>No, not exactly. Motorola does not sell set-tops in retail. Only things that can be purchased in retail with a Motorola logo are the cell phones, cable modems and navigation systems.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013334</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:18:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013176</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1335848"><b>mccla21</b></A> : Anyone have a date for when the 1.6.2 upgrade will come to MD.  If it is in an earlier part of the thread I apologize I didnt see it]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22013176</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:54:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22012868</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : But consumers don't get the STB directly from Motorola and obviously, Verizon controls what we end up with ultimately...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22012868</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:09:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22012486</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><b>blue_trooper</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  OwlSaver <A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I actually think that Verizon (and all Cable/TelcoTV companies) should get out of the STB business. They should leave it to the Consumer Electronics companies.  </div>Isn't Motorola a "consumer electronics company"?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22012486</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:04:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22011116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1150244"><b>OwlSaver</b></A> : I actually think that Verizon (and all Cable/TelcoTV companies) should get out of the STB business. They should leave it to the Consumer Electronics companies. Why should we only be able to get our STB from one company? I know Tivo is a choice but we should have more choices.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22011116</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 00:47:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009349</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><b>JohnA</b></A> : <br>Thanks, Onedollar. I guess it's OK to acknowledge your post, since I have nothing to complain about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009349</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:21:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009293</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>But you're talking about HD local, he's talking about SD<br> </div>My apologies, I did mean SD local. *rolls eyes* I'm guessing I posted before my required caffeine intake. My bad!<br><br>I posted on this topic before in the 1.6.0 thread. SD from the major networks (ABC, NBC, etc) all look great and there aren't any differences that I could notice between them from Vz's QIP6200 and from clear QAM. Now, some of the PEGs look horrible in both ;-) but I suspect that's a source issue, not a firmware one.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009293</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 19:13:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009024</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anyway, I think VZ should just migrate to another STB manufacturer.  I understand the STB market was limited when Fios was initially deployed, but now there are at least 10 different STB manufactures that could supply VZ with suitable settops at a suitable quantity. Theses Moto boxes are nothing but trouble.<br><br>Certainly Moto isn't the only vendor capable of pushing out a MoCa/IP box! But these same "bubble" settops have been around for AWHILE now, and Moto keeps costs down by refurbing allowable parts.<br> </div>Total migration to a new STB vendor may not be an option. Verizon already has deployed hundreds of thousands of Motorola set-tops. Other vendors are not that far along in MoCA/IP. Motorola actually has most experience with MoCA/IP/QAM set-tops. IMHO, it would be in Verizon's interest add more STB vendors into the mix (so not to put all of their eggs into one basket) but that will undoubtedly will cause other issues down the road.<br><br>In general, the whole MoCA/IP/whole home DVR solution is still in its infancy and really nobody has it right yet. Do not forget that Motorola writes the firmware for set-tops but its Verizon IMG guide software that rides on top. They may do a lot of things in IMG that cause some of the issues we are experiencing. Verizon is the one that issues the requirements to the Motorola or any other STB vendor to add/fix/remove/modify things in firmware.<br><br>So for example if there is a problem with SD PQ on 6416's and it's in  firmware it was the VZ that issued the requirement to soften it. Moto complied and when deployed everyone cried murder. So VZ investigated and issued a marching order to Motorola to fix the SD PQ. Now after Motorola fixed it, they have to do their own QA. Once new firmware passes the Motorola QA it is passed to VZ. VZ will run their integration and testing with their new IMG and new firmware. All of this takes quite a long time, usually months. Months to code new software, weeks and weeks of integration and testing. And it still may not fix everything and satisfy everyone. That's unfortunately is the nature of the software beast.<br><small>--<br>xela19115</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22009024</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:37:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008674</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Thanks!!!!<br><br>Ok, just have to keep the wife and kids away from knives and other sharp objects until the 17th. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008674</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:38:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008622</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Jolard, March 17]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008622</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:29:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Any idea when it will roll out for VHO13? (Seattle WA)<br><br>My wife and kids are ready to kill me after we moved to Verizon, and they can no longer watch any recorded HD show over 30 minutes in the bedroom, because of the MRDVR to HD box issues (lost Hub, skipping back to the early part of the show etc). We didn't have HD in the bedroom before, but at least you could watch a whole show!<br><br>I am hoping to survive until 1.6.2 rolls out for us ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008558</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:19:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008369</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/461661"><b>Onedollar</b></A> : *wink* new stb incoming]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008369</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:44:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008206</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nycdave <A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>It's hard to believe something is partially fixed. Either it's fixed or not. The case might be it's either fixed on certain STB's and not others.........<br><br>It was October 2008 when Nycdave posted that Verizon was aware of the SD PQ problems and they were vigourusly working on a fix to rollout.<br><br>Here we are, March 2009, and 1.6.2 is barely rolled out. The sluggishness of Verizon to fix major issues frightens me. God know when we might see 1.7.<br><br>What scares me even more is billing and the addition / removal of a STB. You have a better chance of winning the lottery then your first billing statement being correct after a STB move. <br> </div>Frank, we all know you have issues with the rollout schedule - but please stop posting my name as the VZ contact that makes decisions on the IMG software...<br><br>I was trying to make people aware that Verizon does listen and respond - it might not be as fast as you wish, but don't shoot the messenger.<br> </div>I think Frank was merely trying to reference the exact date when SD went Kaput, not busting your chops. <br><br>Anyway, I think VZ should just migrate to another STB manufacturer.  I understand the STB market was limited when Fios was initially deployed, but now there are at least 10 different STB manufactures that could supply VZ with suitable settops at a suitable quantity. Theses Moto boxes are nothing but trouble.<br><br>Certainly Moto isn't the only vendor capable of pushing out a MoCa/IP box! But these same "bubble" settops have been around for AWHILE now, and Moto keeps costs down by refurbing allowable parts.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008206</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:14:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008043</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><b>nycdave</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>It's hard to believe something is partially fixed. Either it's fixed or not. The case might be it's either fixed on certain STB's and not others.........<br><br>It was October 2008 when Nycdave posted that Verizon was aware of the SD PQ problems and they were vigourusly working on a fix to rollout.<br><br>Here we are, March 2009, and 1.6.2 is barely rolled out. The sluggishness of Verizon to fix major issues frightens me. God know when we might see 1.7.<br><br>What scares me even more is billing and the addition / removal of a STB. You have a better chance of winning the lottery then your first billing statement being correct after a STB move. <br> </div>Frank, we all know you have issues with the rollout schedule - but please stop posting my name as the VZ contact that makes decisions on the IMG software...<br><br>I was trying to make people aware that Verizon does listen and respond - it might not be as fast as you wish, but don't shoot the messenger.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22008043</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:47:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  frankpf3 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>It was October 2008 when Nycdave posted that Verizon was aware of the SD PQ problems and they were vigourusly working on a fix to rollout.<br><br>What scares me even more is billing  </div>Reports are saying that even with 1.6.2 there is a difference in SD PQ between the 6416 and 7216 DVR's with the 7216 still having better SD PQ<br><br>1.6 did not effect the SD PQ on the 7216 but did on the 6416 which would lead me to think the main issue may be at Motorola, like with the "currently unavailable" screen with the 7216, i have had more then one tech tell me that was a Motorola issue, not a Verizon one. Hopefully 1.6.2 will help the SD PQ on the 6416 box's and straighted out the rest of the problems with the 7216's so i can get another one of those for future storage expansion.<br><br>I will agree that <b><i> Verizons Billing Sucks</b></i>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007380</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:35:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007375</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>For your sake, I'll just name the other issues that seem to be better but not completely fixed.  <br><br>2. SD looks better but not at the original PQ before 1.6<br></div>I agree with you on this one...<br><br>I think the PQ is better than it was, but no where near 'stunning' or any other superlative.  It is still fuzzy.  I expect clarity, not fuzziness.  <br><br>I thought I was the only one...so maybe both of us are psychotic...LOL<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:34:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007328</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : It's hard to believe something is partially fixed. Either it's fixed or not. The case might be it's either fixed on certain STB's and not others.........<br><br>It was October 2008 when Nycdave posted that Verizon was aware of the SD PQ problems and they were vigourusly working on a fix to rollout.<br><br>Here we are, March 2009, and 1.6.2 is barely rolled out. The sluggishness of Verizon to fix major issues frightens me. God know when we might see 1.7.<br><br>What scares me even more is billing and the addition / removal of a STB. You have a better chance of winning the lottery then your first billing statement being correct after a STB move. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007328</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:25:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : But you're talking about HD local, he's talking about SD]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007260</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:13:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007236</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>2. SD looks better but not at the original PQ before 1.6<br> </div>On my TV at least, I see no discernible difference between my local HD stations via my QIP6200 with 1.6.1 and via clear QAM. And that was not the case with 1.6.0. For what it's worth. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007236</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:10:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : Is it just me or do I get the sense that the updates VZ pushes out seem to only offer PARTIAL fixes?<br><br>For instance, reports on the big issue of "CURRENTLY UNAVAILABLE" state that the issue occurs less often but it still occurs.  <br><br>For your sake, I'll just name the other issues that seem to be better but not completely fixed.  <br><br>1. Audio/video playback stutter<br>2. SD looks better but not at the original PQ before 1.6<br>3. Skip/replay stutter (won't skip/replay with each press)<br><br>Don't get me wrong, I'll take it if these issues occur less often, but it's still troublesome to know they haven't fixed the issues 100%, even after the amount of time they spent on the release.  95% is not good enough, we need these resolved 100%!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007144</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:55:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007012</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1476706"><b>frankpf3</b></A> : Kudos to Verizon for rolling out a 5 month old production fix.  :uhh:]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22007012</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 12:31:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22006642</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1492716"><b>msmma</b></A> : I've had a few days since getting 1.6.2, and I can honestly say that SD content really does look alot better.  Image is much cleaner than it used to be.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22006642</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:24:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22006351</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Anyone know when VHO7 is scheduled?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22006351</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 10:20:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22004086</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><b>nycdave</b></A> : OR and WA are on 1.6.1, Harrisburg, PA and Buffalo, NY are on 1.6.2 - everyone else is still on 1.6.0....<br><br>Until you hear otherwise...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22004086</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:57:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22004054</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1521695"><b>Tested</b></A> : I'm in Plano, Texas and I too still have 1.6.0]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22004054</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 20:52:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003539</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1072064"><b>Sympathy</b></A> : Still have 1.6.0 here.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003539</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:22:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003126</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  blue_trooper <A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>That same basic Motorola platform is used by multiple providers and none of them have the eSATA port enabled.<br> </div>Yeah and consensus is these refurbed Motorola "bubble" boxes are the bane of us all.  They don't seem to hear us as they count their quarters.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003126</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 18:12:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003037</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  robxr4ti <A HREF="/useremail/u/1492016"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Anyone know if the issue of when using commercial skip on a remote box and it fast forwards out of control without being able to be stopped is resolved in this new release?<br> </div>Here!  Approx 15 posts up from yours!<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/r21999941-">Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</A><br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22003037</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:55:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22002810</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1492016"><b>robxr4ti</b></A> : Anyone know if the issue of when using commercial skip on a remote box and it fast forwards out of control without being able to be stopped is resolved in this new release?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22002810</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:21:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001547</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : Anyone know when VHO9 (Richmond, VA) is scheduled for the update?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001547</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:51:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001533</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1453545"><b>blue_trooper</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  hofs1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1494296"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>i love this question if a company the size of Motorola put an E-Sata port on a hardware device that they built and engineered how is it possible that they cant make it usable?? <br> </div>I believe that Vz alone has developed the firmware that runs the box; just because the hardware is "there", doesn't make the box smart enough to use it...<br> </div>The firmware to enable the e-SATA functionality is developed by Motorola but if its available on DVR set-tops it still must be activated by Verizon. That could be a separate package that maybe charged extra. </div>That same basic Motorola platform is used by multiple providers and none of them have the eSATA port enabled.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001533</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:49:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001403</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  hofs1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1494296"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>i love this question if a company the size of Motorola put an E-Sata port on a hardware device that they built and engineered how is it possible that they cant make it usable?? <br> </div>I believe that Vz alone has developed the firmware that runs the box; just because the hardware is "there", doesn't make the box smart enough to use it...<br> </div>The firmware to enable the e-SATA functionality is developed by Motorola but if its available on DVR set-tops it still must be activated by Verizon. That could be a separate package that maybe charged extra.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001403</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:33:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001140</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1518769"><b>sneskid</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  sneskid <A HREF="/useremail/u/1518769"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>   :</small><br><br>An engineer, maybe.  But obviously to make that statement, you are not in any way a videophile.  Most of us here, are.  As for your claim about it being "somewhat softer", that is hardly the case.  Try reading the text on some of these "somewhat softer" SD channels.  I'm sorry, but as limited as SD is, it should still NEVER appear out of focus.  <br>That said, I'd rather take an analog Comcast feed over that, any day.  It may be a little noisy, but at least I can read the text. <br> </div>Why don't you switch back to Comcast and it will be one less complainer "videophile" to hear from on this forum.<br> </div>Yeah, you would say that... -sigh-]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001140</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:50:42 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001025</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Thx.. I'll go with USB.. I have 2 now ..Love um for back ups<br>Lee :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22001025</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:31:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000816</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hofs1 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1494296"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>i love this question if a company the size of Motorola put an E-Sata port on a hardware device that they built and engineered how is it possible that they cant make it usable?? <br> </div>I believe that Vz alone has developed the firmware that runs the box; just because the hardware is "there", doesn't make the box smart enough to use it...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000816</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:52:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000610</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1494296"><b>hofs1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nycdave <A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Lee GWB <A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>or at least enable the esata or USB for HDD's<br>Lee<br> </div>External HD support has still not been developed, so it can't be in 1.6.2....<br> </div>i love this question if a company the size of Motorola put an E-Sata port on a hardware device that they built and engineered how is it possible that they cant make it usable?? What other purpose is there for such a port??<br><br>i know its use was never guaranteed etc etc but come on now 160gig on an HD Box is  rather old school eh??<br><br>And if its the big worry that they will need to support it etc etc...just do what scientific atlanta did...turn on the port  but dont announce it as a feature. this way it will work but VZ wont have to take support calls for it  u know use at your own risk stuff.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000610</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:16:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000329</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597198"><b>Jake5975</b></A> : Yes - I have a SD box as well.  I never experienced the HUB error or FF problem on the SD box when streaming from the MR-DVR.  Regardless, I used this box as well over the weekend to stream a recorded show, and it worked fine.<br><br>I can also concur that the skip function appears to be better after 1.6.2]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000329</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 10:19:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000168</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Thank you!<br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Nascar,<br><br>I can confirm that the skip hiccup has been greatly reduced.<br><br>It still happens on occasion, but not nearly as much.<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000168</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:45:19 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000141</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Nascar,<br><br>I can confirm that the skip hiccup has been greatly reduced.<br><br>It still happens on occasion, but not nearly as much.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000141</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:41:53 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000140</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/118222"><b>nycdave</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Lee GWB <A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>or at least enable the esata or USB for HDD's<br>Lee<br> </div>External HD support has still not been developed, so it can't be in 1.6.2....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000140</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:41:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000128</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : How about the Skip hiccup? Is that fixed in 1.6.2?<br><br>I meant when you are using the DVR (not multi room) and you hit skip and then skip again quickly it hiccups and doesn't skip.  Is that fixed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000128</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:38:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000070</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : or at least enable the esata or USB for HDD's<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000070</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:27:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000012</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Jake, do you have an SD box to also test the multiroom on? ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22000012</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 09:15:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21999941</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597198"><b>Jake5975</b></A> : Yes - MR-DVR streaming seems to be fixed.  Watched several recorded shows on the bedroom HD-STB, and no HUB errors at all.  Also, no problems when coming out of a FF, and the skip function (both forward and back) works as well.  Knock on wood, I think the MR-DVR is finally doing what it should.  Now, lets get a larger capacity in them.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21999941</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:54:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21993652</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : How about the Skip hiccup?  Is that fixed in 1.6.2?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21993652</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:26:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21992830</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Can anyone who got the upgrade tell us if the streaming from MRDVR to HD boxes issue has been corrected (ie the one where you're watching a HD show and it stops/resets in the middle of the show)?  I returned the MRDVR for that reason.<br>Thanks in advance <br>Adam]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21992830</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:41:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21992789</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : Yes the cast info cutoff is annoying isn't it? <br><br>Also I used to be able to get movie ratings (stars) via a search.  I just tried now and I can't seem to get them.  Any idea if this will be added to the general info or has it been removed for good?   <br><br>Sorry if this is off topic!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21992789</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:31:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991760</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/220397"><b>Steely</b></A> : The thing is I get the feeling, although I may be wrong, that the guide PROVIDER <i>is</i> providing that additional cast content to Verizon (implied by the "..."), but that a limitation in Verizon's GUI prevents the user from being able to ACCESS that information.  It just appears to be hidden from view!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991760</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:46:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991736</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1197971"><b>amarryat</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Steely <A HREF="/useremail/u/220397"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I don't suppose 1.6.2 (which I don't have yet) addresses that in any way.  I'm not even sure anyone else sees this as an issue. :(<br> </div>You are correct - this does not belong in this thread.  However you are not alone - you can search this forum and find countless complaints about the poor guide data.  Verizon really needs to change providers for that.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991736</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:40:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991568</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/220397"><b>Steely</b></A> : I'm not sure if this is a <i>guide</i> issue per se, but one of the things that has irked me since moving to FiOS from Comcast is both the incompleteness of cast information displayed and the level of difficulty in getting to that information for any particular program.<br><br>With Comcast, if my recollection is accurate, even the basic program description that comes up when you first change channels listed at least the principal cast members.  With FiOS, you have to actually open one of the guide pages, and even then, most of the time only a very partial cast list is visible in the upper-right portion of the screen.  Often it ends with a first name followed by a few dots (e.g., "Susan...") which IMPLIES that more information is available, but there's NO WAY to expand that portion of the screen or to move on to a second page in order to access that implied additional information (like the last name of "Susan" in my example).   When necessary, the LOWER-right portion of the screen can be expanded, but NEVER the upper-right portion with the cast info.<br><br>I see this as a major shortcoming in the way program info is displayed, particularly with movies but also with regular TV shows.  I don't suppose 1.6.2 (which I don't have yet) addresses that in any way.  I'm not even sure anyone else sees this as an issue. :(]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991568</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:59:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991472</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : After a few days with 1.6.2 - my impressions: (7216HD DVR-HDMI connection)<br><br>The currently unavailable issue is not completely resolved. I've tried (a lot) to make it happen and have only seen it occur twice. The message has changed to (paraphrase) "this channel is currently unavailable. tune to another channel and then tune back here. if this is a local channel it may not be broadcasting at the current time."<br>The freeze for a second then jump forward issue I have experienced regularly on the HD feeds for Fox, Fox Business, and FX have not happened at all.<br>Audio pops when using HDMI have gone away.<br>There is a new option to turn the clock display off when the DVR is off.<br>There is a new option to disable 'TV Modes'. I think this is the menu that pops up when you hit the right arrow while watching live TV.<br>The remote is much more responsive. Surfing is a much more pleasant experience.<br>If the power state of the DVR and the TV get out of sync (i.e. the TV is ON but the DVR is OFF) a message appears stating you can hit the MENU button on the remote to turn ON just the DVR.<br>When changing channels the issue of the mini guide moving to the new channel but the audio and video not moving has not been resolved. <br>The guide seems more readable. I think some of the colors have changed subtly. The red background for movies seems a deeper red which gives better contrast with the white text. I wish they would allow for user selectable font size and color scheme in the guide. <br><br>I haven't noticed any new bugs being introduced!<br><br>All in all a good step forward.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991472</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:34:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991276</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/661360"><b>andranic</b></A> : Does anyone know wut version vho 5 should be at right now. I was looking last night and saw that im still on 1.6.0 ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21991276</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:49:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988968</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/899744"><b>Belspur</b></A> : Thanks Jeep,<br><br>I still will be patiently waiting.  :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988968</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:37:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988871</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1555732"><b>shark2k</b></A> : Wow.  I'm away from this place for a week so I find out about this upgrade the day after it gets released.  Glad to know VHO7 is getting this in a little less than two weeks.<br><br>Thanks for the thread Jeep.<br><br>-Shark2k]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988871</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:15:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988784</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Looks like I am going to lose this bet. :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988784</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:53:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1568454"><b>PJL</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  carljanderso <A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>Carl,<br>If CA is VHO3 (which I think it is), unfortunately you guys are currently LAST on the rollout. Mid-April time frame.<br> [/BQUOTE :</small><br><br>Yes, VHO3 is Southern California. <br><br>AWESOME!!!! Back of the line for us. Since I never saw the SD PQ on the 6xxx boxes prior to 1.6, I guess I don't know what I am going to missing (until I see it in APRIL). <br> </div>Yep, California is always last -- but at least the rollout is solid by the time we get it -- all the practice in the other parts of the country.  And although we had to wait for the additional HD channels to last, we got all of them at once.  :-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988581</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:08:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1581705"><b>carljanderso</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>Carl,<br>If CA is VHO3 (which I think it is), unfortunately you guys are currently LAST on the rollout. Mid-April time frame.<br> [/BQUOTE :</small><br><br>Yes, VHO3 is Southern California. <br><br>AWESOME!!!! Back of the line for us. Since I never saw the SD PQ on the 6xxx boxes prior to 1.6, I guess I don't know what I am going to missing (until I see it in APRIL). ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988561</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:04:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988380</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1577890"><b>ggma1126</b></A> : thanks matt didn't see that one  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988380</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:33:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988370</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : He already said 3/10 for Philly]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988370</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:32:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988360</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1577890"><b>ggma1126</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>You'll be happy. Believe me.<br> </div>Hey Jeep - when is DE slated to get the upgrade as my boxes are still at 1.6]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988360</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:31:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988265</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1494296"><b>hofs1</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  hobgoblin <A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> I have cleaned up the wires a bit since!<br> </div>Um what do u mean by a bit????  Im thinking rip em all out and start over... :D....lol.....sorry i had to say it it really doesnt matter in the end but as an installer i found that comment rather funny.<br><br>Please take this as a good ribbing nothing more.<br><br>P.S. I see some glare on that screen of yours.... :D...oops i did it again..... :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988265</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:15:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988221</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1624903"><b>Billy Bob</b></A> : when I get 1.6.2 upgrade in SI, I will see how the SD PQ is on my HDTV's since I m getting mixed reviews on here, but more than less has been good. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988221</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:05:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : VHO4 - 3/31]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988210</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:03:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988108</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1596348"><b>negeland</b></A> : Does anyone know when the upgrade will be rolled out for VHO4 - Silver Spring MD region?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21988108</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:36:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21987899</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  sneskid <A HREF="/useremail/u/1518769"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>An engineer, maybe.  But obviously to make that statement, you are not in any way a videophile.  Most of us here, are.  As for your claim about it being "somewhat softer", that is hardly the case.  Try reading the text on some of these "somewhat softer" SD channels.  I'm sorry, but as limited as SD is, it should still NEVER appear out of focus.  <br>That said, I'd rather take an analog Comcast feed over that, any day.  It may be a little noisy, but at least I can read the text. <br> </div>Why don't you switch back to Comcast and it will be one less complainer "videophile" to hear from on this forum.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21987899</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:59:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21987391</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1523895"><b>meverly59</b></A> : I believe the stuttering (dropped frames) has been fixed<br>on the 64xx boxes in the VHO14 area (Harrisburg)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21987391</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:48:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986203</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1492716"><b>msmma</b></A> : Ok, sorry for the late reply....was busy last night.<br><br>Both my 7100 boxes got the 1.62 update yesterday.  Overall, I would say SD channels look MUCH better to me.  The true test was when we were watching cartoons last night (We love Spongebob...lol).  The overall picture looked crisper, and the lines around characters eyes didnt have that heavy smearing/blurring effect that it normally did.  HD channels look just as great as they did before.  I don't have DVR boxes so I cant test the other stuff you guys are asking about.  I cant comment on audio dropout because I never had any to begin with.<br><br>So, my 2 cents are it's a good update!   ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986203</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:34:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986079</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><b>hobgoblin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  crankerchick <A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>can anyone with the update confirm if the clock display BUG is fixed in this release? it is not on the "unofficial" posted list of  fixes so i'm guessing it still remains unadressed. I'm talking about the hd dvr stb being set to show the clock and it reverts to showing the channel all the time regardless of the menu setting.<br> </div>Mine is still showing the clock since the upgrade.<br><small>--<br>"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." <br>- Ralph Waldo Emerson <br></small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986079</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:11:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986076</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/559512"><b>AVITWeb</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  meverly59 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1523895"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>We got the Update. On the 64xx box, SD picture quality much improved. I haven't yet turned on the 7216 to see if audio burps are gone, although I've seen reports they are.<br><br>Once Basketball starts tonight, I'll be able to see if the stuttering (dropped frames) is fixed on the 64xx boxes.<br><br>BTW, I'm in Harrisburg<br> </div>Have you been able to determine if the picture stutter has gona away?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986076</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:11:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986012</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1518769"><b>sneskid</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Your argument that PQ is not all that important is just laughable. Especially when PQ is a huge reason people get Fios, SD or HD.</div>Listen, I'm an engineer so I know exactly how these decisions are made and what and how gets prioritized. PQ is important but in this particular situation its not like you get a distorted video or macro-blocking a la Comcast. You get somewhat softer PQ on SD channels. So Verizon made a priority call on when to deploy the fix. I bet that there is a long list of more serious problems that needed more urgent fixes than a soft SD video. At least Verizon acknowledged it. Comcast would have told you to go pound sand.<br><br>Also people in general I think are loosing focus that it's only TV, whether its HD or SD. Its a luxury and not a necessity. Overall I think Verizon does a terrific job with FIOS TV.<br> </div>An engineer, maybe.  But obviously to make that statement, you are not in any way a videophile.  Most of us here, are.  As for your claim about it being "somewhat softer", that is hardly the case.  Try reading the text on some of these "somewhat softer" SD channels.  I'm sorry, but as limited as SD is, it should still NEVER appear out of focus.  <br>That said, I'd rather take an analog Comcast feed over that, any day.  It may be a little noisy, but at least I can read the text. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21986012</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:58:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985849</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  c64 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>So what bugs haven't been fixed? Or did I miss a thread?<br> </div>Once more people get 1.6.2 and experiment with it, I'm sure we'll find out.  ;)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985849</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:27:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><b>c64</b></A> : So what bugs haven't been fixed? Or did I miss a thread?<br><small>--<br>9929</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985839</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:24:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985703</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : can anyone with the update confirm if the clock display BUG is fixed in this release? it is not on the "unofficial" posted list of  fixes so i'm guessing it still remains unadressed. I'm talking about the hd dvr stb being set to show the clock and it reverts to showing the channel all the time regardless of the menu setting.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985703</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:05:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985647</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : Excellent response.<br><br>This is similar to the denial/non acknowledgement of the known issues between the Actiontech Router/Vista and its fios service. <br><br>There are numerous threads here, over its own forums and on MS's website related to the issue and this issue has totally been ignored by Verizon.<br><br>I got so fed up by my Actiontech dropped signal 2-3 times a day and bought a "Trendnet signal booaster" and my wireless signal have been perfect ever since. I went through 6 months of hell in the process however with the Actiontech.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985647</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:58:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985581</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Your argument that PQ is not all that important is just laughable. Especially when PQ is a huge reason people get Fios, SD or HD.</div>Listen, I'm an engineer so I know exactly how these decisions are made and what and how gets prioritized. PQ is important but in this particular situation its not like you get a distorted video or macro-blocking a la Comcast. You get somewhat softer PQ on SD channels. So Verizon made a priority call on when to deploy the fix. I bet that there is a long list of more serious problems that needed more urgent fixes than a soft SD video. At least Verizon acknowledged it. Comcast would have told you to go pound sand.<br><br>Also people in general I think are loosing focus that it's only TV, whether its HD or SD. Its a luxury and not a necessity. Overall I think Verizon does a terrific job with FIOS TV.<br> </div>Ahh, another self labeled tech elite trying to tell users what is and is not important with the service.  Here's a wake up call dude, PQ is one of the most important aspects when it comes to TV service.  <br><br>My main beef was VZ broke the SD PQ, and instead of getting out an emergency fix they took their good ole time while many users were expecting a quick fix to rollout.  VZ could have communicated what they were planning to do instead of keeping their users guessing.  If they had just communicated, that would have helped the situation.  But as I've heard from MANY VZ employee's, the communications company needs a lesson on COMMUNICATION.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985581</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:48:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985374</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1050874"><b>jdrtech</b></A> : VHO5 FOR STATEN ISLAND]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21985374</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984561</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JohnA <A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I thought it was supposed to be adjustable. Is there anywhere in the settings to adjust it's sharpness?<br> </div>No, that's a future release.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984561</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:46:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984067</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/875438"><b>JohnA</b></A> : <br>I thought it was supposed to be adjustable. Is there anywhere in the settings to adjust it's sharpness?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984067</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:22:26 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984051</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  MeatChicken <A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><b>Here's One to Test For those with 1.62:</b><br>  (Unless someone already knows the answer) ...<br><br> When you select from the DVR menu, & start playing back, from the begining,  <i>a recording that hasn't yet "finished" </i>( you're starting to watch a recording that's already, say, about 1hr into a 2hr show), there are a couple of "Quirks:<br><br>  The DVR doesn't display "Play" as it should, it rather shows the channel number ... And ..<br>  If you press "stop"  during the playback , instead of "stopping the playback", it comes up with a warning screen asking if you want to stop recording instead.<br>  It's as if the DVR "doesn't know" it's playing back a recording .. <br> </div>MeatChicken-<br><br>I just tried to re-create your scenario - and it's still as you said. If I try watching a recording in progress, it does not say PLAY on the STB, and if I try to stop it, it thinks i'm trying to stop the recording as well.<br><br>I never noticed this before. You might be on to a bug there.<br><br>To answer the other question about if you scroll too fast with the info box, I just did it with no issues whatsoever.<br> </div> If you have an "in" with anyone at VZ ear, please let them know about this ...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21984051</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:18:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983964</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1147076"><b>Hosehead</b></A> : Improved, but still not 'stunning' as I expected. What am I missing with SD PQ?<br><small>--<br>Wormleysburg, PA</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983964</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:56:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983479</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><b>c64</b></A> : Jeep,<br>Before the 1.6.2 patch did you experience stuttering picture from dvr recordings of History HD? <br><small>--<br>9929</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983479</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:04:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983464</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  c64 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I guess the ESATA still isn't available on the 7xxx boxes?<br> </div>Correct, it's not available on any box.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983464</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 22:01:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983427</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570327"><b>c64</b></A> : I have the 7xxx series boxes and my main problem is "unavailable channel" & Stuttering pic from a dvr recording of some certain HD channels.Hope this patch fixes this.I guess the ESATA still isn't available on the 7xxx boxes?<br><small>--<br>9929</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21983427</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:56:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : Nevermind, brain fart... :p]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982839</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:06:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982831</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  MeatChicken <A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><b>Here's One to Test For those with 1.62:</b><br>  (Unless someone already knows the answer) ...<br><br> When you select from the DVR menu, & start playing back, from the begining,  <i>a recording that hasn't yet "finished" </i>( you're starting to watch a recording that's already, say, about 1hr into a 2hr show), there are a couple of "Quirks:<br><br>  The DVR doesn't display "Play" as it should, it rather shows the channel number ... And ..<br>  If you press "stop"  during the playback , instead of "stopping the playback", it comes up with a warning screen asking if you want to stop recording instead.<br>  It's as if the DVR "doesn't know" it's playing back a recording .. <br> </div>MeatChicken-<br><br>I just tried to re-create your scenario - and it's still as you said. If I try watching a recording in progress, it does not say PLAY on the STB, and if I try to stop it, it thinks i'm trying to stop the recording as well.<br><br>I never noticed this before. You might be on to a bug there.<br><br>To answer the other question about if you scroll too fast with the info box, I just did it with no issues whatsoever.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982831</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:05:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982759</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1234910"><b>JayMan 007</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Jake5975 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1597198"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Hershey, PA here <br><br>Have 1.6.2, and so far, it's great.  <br>I did note that DVR playback only has three speeds of FF now, as opposed to the four is used to have.  <br>The screen saver feature if the TV is on, but the cable box isn't is nice - to turn to cable box on in that case, you simply hit "menu".  This is great, because before that, you had to hit "power" again, which would shut the tv, surround sound, etc. off.  <br> </div>Only 3 FF modes, I was hoping for a 5th (super sonic FF).<br>So is the "menu" like a pseudo discrete code? - that would be cool.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982759</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:53:15 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982748</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><b>hobgoblin</b></A> : It is a 6 series Box<br><br>6416-2 is stamped on it!<br><br>Hob]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982748</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:51:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982735</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Hob, the SD only affected the 6xxx boxes, if you have the 7 series those were never affected.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982735</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:50:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982659</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jeep,<br>Does the box still buffer with it off since it now shows the logo?<br> </div>Yes<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982659</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:36:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982638</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/522329"><b>hobgoblin</b></A> : Ok...<br><br>I currently am watching the Sabres on MSG and changing back and forward between TW and Verizon and I see absolutely no difference at all. They both look the same and I see no improvement at all with Verizon. One of my biggest complaints is the picture quality of MSG Sabres away games....so it may be the feed.<br><br>Of course its subjective but I am not seeing anything to oooh and ahhh over!<br><br>For the kind person who did not believe I had both services I have attached a picture shortly after the FIOS install. I have cleaned up the wires a bit since!<br><small>--<br>"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds." <br>- Ralph Waldo Emerson <br></small><div class="borderless"><TABLE WIDTH=95% align=center border=0 CELLPADDING=4"><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21982638?c=1404502&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTk3NTMxMC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="537267 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1404502.thumb600~d7b6b3d2e7851fb011cdbff59f423684/cross 050.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TR><TR><TD ALIGN=CENTER VALIGN=CENTER BGCOLOR=#FFFFFF nwrap COLSPAN=3 WIDTH=100%><A HREF="/speak/slideshow/21982638?c=1404503&ret=L2ZvcnVtL3IyMTk3NTMxMC54bWw%3D"><IMG class="apic" BORDER=0 TITLE="514401 bytes" WIDTH=600 HEIGHT=450 SRC="/r0/download/1404503.thumb600~6f05719ddd7860264df215d29facd4d3/cross 051.jpg/thumb.jpg" ALT="Click for full size"></A></TD></TABLE></div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982638</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:32:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982557</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Jeep,<br>Does the box still buffer with it off since it now shows the logo?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982557</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:12:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982555</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Any word when Richmond, VA VH09 will get these?<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982555</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:09:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982531</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : Watching the reports trickle in, I'm already getting nostalgic.<br><br>I may have to change channels & pause and start DVR recordings a lot over the next couple weeks - soon my beloved audio burp will be gone... Woo-Hoo!!!<br><br>Can someone give more details about what is different/new with the menus?<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982531</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:06:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982366</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : They got rid of the 4 speeds long ago, not just with 1.6.2]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982366</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:38:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982344</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1597198"><b>Jake5975</b></A> : Hershey, PA here <br><br>Have 1.6.2, and so far, it's great.  Much improved SD quality.  Much better response with remote control commands.  DVR seems to be fixed!  I did note that DVR playback only has three speeds of FF now, as opposed to the four is used to have.  If the MR-DVR is in fact fixed, I could care less.  The screen saver feature if the TV is on, but the cable box isn't is nice - to turn to cable box on in that case, you simply hit "menu".  This is great, because before that, you had to hit "power" again, which would shut the tv, surround sound, etc. off.  Still poking around for new features, but I'm very impressed.  Kudos to VZ!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982344</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:36:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982342</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/495421"><b>Lee GWB</b></A> : Hey,<br>    What the heck. Why have TV? Just give them your money and not view it at all!! That sounds logical.<br> :huh:<br>Lee]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982342</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:35:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982242</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : It's not a must have, no, but when I watch it, I want to watch clarity. If I didn't, I would have kept my old 13" black & white set.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982242</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:14:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982222</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : Any word on the HDMI handshake bug? Anybody notice this with 1.6.2?<br><br>Or anyone in "the know" know if this has been addressed?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982222</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:09:28 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982203</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>    :</small><br><br>Also people in general I think are loosing focus that it's only TV, whether its HD or SD. Its a luxury and not a necessity. Overall I think Verizon does a terrific job with FIOS TV.<br> </div>It's only TV? What's the main purpose of TV? To "view" it. That would be like saying you had a radio with bad static and can't hear the station very good, but it's only radio. Verizon did say it was a priority when it originally happened.<br> </div>Would you literally get sick or die if you did not watch TV for a few days. weeks, months, etc? No! So its a nice-to-have not a must-to-have.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982203</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:06:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982097</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Rattler <A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>If you want guide info beyond what is stored, I think you actually have to wait until V* updates the guide and downloads more to the box before you can get to it.  i.e. I don't think you can get any more by requesting it, the STB should have all that's available already.<br> </div> <br> You don't need to wait, pressing the day advance button will access the rest of the days.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982097</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:48:11 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982084</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Also people in general I think are loosing focus that it's only TV, whether its HD or SD. Its a luxury and not a necessity. Overall I think Verizon does a terrific job with FIOS TV.<br> </div>It's only TV? What's the main purpose of TV? To "view" it. That would be like saying you had a radio with bad static and can't hear the station very good, but it's only radio. Verizon did say it was a priority when it originally happened.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21982084</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:46:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981990</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Xela19115 <A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Listen, I'm an engineer so I know exactly how these decisions are made and what and how gets prioritized. <br> </div>Oh, well, now you've gone and done it. There are any number of posters on this forum who will soundly ignore your logic and your experience. But kudos to you for trying! :D]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981990</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:32:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981970</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/214597"><b>Xela19115</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Your argument that PQ is not all that important is just laughable. Especially when PQ is a huge reason people get Fios, SD or HD.</div>Listen, I'm an engineer so I know exactly how these decisions are made and what and how gets prioritized. PQ is important but in this particular situation its not like you get a distorted video or macro-blocking a la Comcast. You get somewhat softer PQ on SD channels. So Verizon made a priority call on when to deploy the fix. I bet that there is a long list of more serious problems that needed more urgent fixes than a soft SD video. At least Verizon acknowledged it. Comcast would have told you to go pound sand.<br><br>Also people in general I think are loosing focus that it's only TV, whether its HD or SD. Its a luxury and not a necessity. Overall I think Verizon does a terrific job with FIOS TV.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981970</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:28:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981646</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : I don't really want to belabor this and I don't want to hijack this thread.  <br><br>But what I am describing is specifically related to Series Recordings.  If I scroll through my <i>scheduled</i> Series Recordings too fast I get "program description" lag or even a black screen.<br><br>Is this something only I experience?  I do have plenty of Series Recordings setup so maybe that could be a reason.<br><br>I need to open a new thread and probably best if I make a video to better show what I am talking about.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981646</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:25:09 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981589</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/367776"><b>Rattler</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Bottom line is that since the guide data comes in via IP (this isn't a surprise right?) then there could be an inherited and expected lag.<br> </div>The guide data is DELIVERED over IP BUT the STBs buffer several days (right now, my 6416 has 11 days stored).  So, if you are just flipping through the guide, or are using it to schedule things within the next week or so, the box does not have to wait for the data to be downloaded so there really should not be an appreciable delay in accessing it.<br><br>If you want guide info beyond what is stored, I think you actually have to wait until V* updates the guide and downloads more to the box before you can get to it.  i.e. I don't think you can get any more by requesting it, the STB should have all that's available already.<br><br>I also believe that VOD programming data is delivered realtime and that may be why there is sometimes some lag when flipping through the selections - on this, I may be wrong.<br><small>--<br>Never raise your hands to your kids.  It leaves your groin unprotected. -- Red Buttons</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981589</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:15:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981551</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : OK good to know!!!  Thank  you!!!  :D<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br> then there could be an inherited and expected lag.<br> </div>This is NOT expected behavior. Verizon is aware of the issue/bug :)<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981551</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:08:04 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981528</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  nascar <A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br> then there could be an inherited and expected lag.<br> </div>This is NOT expected behavior. Verizon is aware of the issue/bug :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981528</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:03:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981521</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1523895"><b>meverly59</b></A> : We got the Update. On the 64xx box, SD picture quality much improved. I haven't yet turned on the 7216 to see if audio burps are gone, although I've seen reports they are.<br><br>Once Basketball starts tonight, I'll be able to see if the stuttering (dropped frames) is fixed on the 64xx boxes.<br><br>BTW, I'm in Harrisburg]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981521</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:01:31 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981492</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Funny. :D<br><br>OK. Well maybe I need to record it and post a video of what I am poorly attempting to describe.<br><br>Bottom line is that since the guide data comes in via IP (this isn't a surprise right?) then there could be an inherited and expected lag.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981492</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:56:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981426</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : since my reply was right under yours, then yes, i don't understand what you're saying :) but no worries... i know what i'm talking about ;-)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981426</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:42:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981411</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : You guys don't know what I'm saying?  Or are you referring to someone else?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981411</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:38:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981370</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : I didn't understand what he was saying either Darci, but I reported that problem to someone at Verizon when you and someone else mentioned it.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981370</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:29:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981345</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : I don't think I understand what you're saying.<br><br>I'm clicking very slowly, from channel to channel -- not so slowly that the channel info goes away but I'm not holding down the channel up/down buttons either...<br><br>Anyhow, it's a known issue, and I'm hopeful that 1.6.2 will fix it... (I never noticed it once during the 1.6.1 beta, btw)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981345</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:26:24 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981327</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Probably since all the guide data comes in via IP there is some lag. Same lag as when I go through my scheduled Series Recordings.  If I go to fast I have to wait for it to catch up or I get prior data or a black screen.<br><br>I assume everyone else does too.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  darcilicious <A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Happens on the QIP 6200 and I can't always get it to happen and it happens when I'm not expecting, mostly though, when I'm just going up or down, one channel at a time, for several (10+) channels in a row. Suddenly, the "channel info bar" will get stuck on a channel. If you stop changing channels at that point, the "channel info bar" will finally display the correct channel info just before disappearing. Then it seems find after that until it happens again...<br> </div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981327</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:24:13 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981316</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1492716"><b>msmma</b></A> : Im in the Amherst/Buffalo area, so I should have 1.62 on my boxes.  At work, so I cant check...<br><br>I'll check tonite, and post back my SD content feedback (Im on 7100 boxes).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981316</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:22:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981297</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/275993"><b>darcilicious</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  squatch41 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1579024"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jeep, one thing they found wrong in Oregon when channel surfing: Sometimes the info banner wouldn't change fast enough and you were left with the info banner from a previous channel. Have you seen this?<br> </div>Hmmmm..hadn't noticed that, but will check this evening.<br> </div>Just a FYI that this is only happening on my QIP7100 HD STB.<br> </div>Happens on the QIP 6200 and I can't always get it to happen and it happens when I'm not expecting, mostly though, when I'm just going up or down, one channel at a time, for several (10+) channels in a row. Suddenly, the "channel info bar" will get stuck on a channel. If you stop changing channels at that point, the "channel info bar" will finally display the correct channel info just before disappearing. Then it seems find after that until it happens again...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981297</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:19:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981245</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1604756"><b>NullQwerty</b></A> : Ahh ok...Thanks!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981245</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:09:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981226</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1579024"><b>squatch41</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  NullQwerty <A HREF="/useremail/u/1604756"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>No difference on SD picture quality, huh?  That's a shame.   </div>Just a FYI that the 1.6.1 update recd here in WA/OR in January DID noticeably sharpen the SD picture on the HD 6416 DVR so I assume the same effect will be seen with the 1.6.2.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981226</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:04:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981210</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1454065"><b>robconrad</b></A> : I'm glad to hear about the VZ symbol when the STB box is powered off.  I can't begin to count the number of times my 50" LCD has been left on because the STB was powered off (although my 6 year old has grasped the concept of making sure the TV is off when she is done).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981210</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:01:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981190</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Null-<br>Word is that it DID improve the SD picture quality, but this was only seen on the 6xxx series boxes.<br><br>I only have 7xxx series boxes in my house, so I never "did" see the poorer quality - so I can't officially comment.<br><br>Sorry if I wasn't clear in the first post.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981190</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:56:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981181</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1604756"><b>NullQwerty</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Mwnets-<br><br>Since 1.6.2 is officially released to customers, I assume it's safe to comment.<br><br>I've actually been using 1.6.2 for the past 2 weeks now on a 7216 DVR beta-testing it. (Thank you Verizon!!!!)<br><br>I don't know of an official "Fix list", but I can tell you what I've noticed:<br><br>- Currently Unavailable (never saw it much, but have not seen it once since the new firmware)<br><br>- 7216 DVR "audio dropouts" - 1-2 brief audio dropouts that many here have reported - this NO LONGER happens  :p :p (This was my biggest gripe - was very annoying, and happened after channel change, FF, REW, etc.)<br><br>- Picture freeze / Audio continues - many people reported this, mostly on Fox HD (thread on here about "24") and other 720p HD stations - this NO LONGER happens  :p :p (2nd biggest gripe - my other half almost forced us back to Comcast b/c of this)<br><br>- Response to remote control is MUCH faster and the IMG itself seems snappier (i.e if you hit 30-sec skip twice, it actually skips 60 seconds!!)<br><br>- Some menus and layouts have been made more fluid and it's easier to find things<br><br>- Search functionality seems to be much faster<br><br>- I only ever saw the "Unable to locate HUB" message once or twice (with 1.6), but have not seen it since 1.6.2.<br><br>- We should be closer to getting logos back for all of the newer channels that have been added over the past 6+ months<br><br>- Additional "games" offerings <br><br>- When you power off the STB, a new floating VZ symbol screen saver kicks in<br><br>I hope this is a good starting point for everyone. I've always had 7xxx series boxes, so I CANNOT comment on the "SD pic quality".<br><br>Overall, everyone should be extremely happy once they receive the update, and this board should become much quieter.  :p<br> </div>No difference on SD picture quality, huh?  That's a shame.  <br><br>At least the remote response is better...that's definitely a good thing.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981181</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:53:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981144</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1478162"><b>MeatChicken</b></A> : <b>Here's One to Test For those with 1.62:</b><br>  (Unless someone already knows the answer) ...<br><br> When you select from the DVR menu, & start playing back, from the begining,  <i>a recording that hasn't yet "finished" </i>( you're starting to watch a recording that's already, say, about 1hr into a 2hr show), there are a couple of "Quirks:<br><br>  The DVR doesn't display "Play" as it should, it rather shows the channel number ... And ..<br>  If you press "stop"  during the playback , instead of "stopping the playback", it comes up with a warning screen asking if you want to stop recording instead.<br>  It's as if the DVR "doesn't know" it's playing back a recording .. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981144</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:44:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981143</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1579024"><b>squatch41</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jeep, one thing they found wrong in Oregon when channel surfing: Sometimes the info banner wouldn't change fast enough and you were left with the info banner from a previous channel. Have you seen this?<br> </div>Hmmmm..hadn't noticed that, but will check this evening.<br> </div>Just a FYI that this is only happening on my QIP7100 HD STB. That little burp does not happen on my HD DVR 6416.<br><br>Thanks for posting the list, Matt. As I've mentioned in another thread, the Hub erro increased after we got 1.6.1 and it's made using the MR pretty much useless especiall for the wife. Can't wait for thsi new version.<br><br>Thanks.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981143</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:44:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981116</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jeep, one thing they found wrong in Oregon when channel surfing: Sometimes the info banner wouldn't change fast enough and you were left with the info banner from a previous channel. Have you seen this?<br> </div>Hmmmm..hadn't noticed that, but will check this evening.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981116</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:38:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981112</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  matcarl <A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Jeep, one thing they found wrong in Oregon when channel surfing: Sometimes the info banner wouldn't change fast enough and you were left with the info banner from a previous channel. Have you seen this?<br> </div>This is another thing I've definitely noticed with 1.60...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981112</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:37:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981107</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1444888"><b>matcarl</b></A> : Jeep, one thing they found wrong in Oregon when channel surfing: Sometimes the info banner wouldn't change fast enough and you were left with the info banner from a previous channel. Have you seen this?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981107</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:36:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>*slightly* OT: Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981105</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by Jeep Matt :</small><br><br>- Picture freeze / Audio continues - many people reported this, mostly on Fox HD (thread on here about "24") and other 720p HD stations - this NO LONGER happens   (2nd biggest gripe - my other half almost forced us back to Comcast b/c of this)</div>How can one determine if an HD channel is a "720P HD station"?<br><br>For me this is <b>BY FAR</b>, the worst, indemic problem. And, it does seem to be as you say, Fox stations, as I often flip through news channels, and now when I think about it, this always happens with Fox or FBN, but I don't recall it occurring with CNN/CNBC..]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981105</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:36:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981096</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1211182"><b>msanta</b></A> : Will the pixelation issue on FX and NatGeo HD channels be fixed with this upgrade?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981096</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:34:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981095</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Heck,<br><br>Darci got to beta test 1.6.1! <br><br>I think she gets the honor of doing that first..lol.  ;)<br><br>I will admit that I have a number of contacts with VZ. One thing I've learned over my 3 year relationship with FIOS is that they do have some damn good people working for them, from the FSC, to the field techs, to the VHO's, all the way to Corporate.<br><br>It's always imperative to remember those people that helped you out, and convey that you trust and appreciate them. It's really benefited me over the years.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981095</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:34:17 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981087</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/140267"><b>nascar</b></A> : Nice to know Verizon has let qualified non employees beta test.<br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  JeepMatt <A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Mwnets-<br><br>Since 1.6.2 is officially released to customers, I assume it's safe to comment.<br><br>I've actually been using 1.6.2 for the past 2 weeks now on a 7216 DVR beta-testing it. (Thank you Verizon!!!!)</div>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981087</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:32:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981005</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Mwnets-<br><br>Since 1.6.2 is officially released to customers, I assume it's safe to comment.<br><br>I've actually been using 1.6.2 for the past 2 weeks now on a 7216 DVR beta-testing it. (Thank you Verizon!!!!)<br><br>I don't know of an official "Fix list", but I can tell you what I've noticed:<br><br>- Currently Unavailable (never saw it much, but have not seen it once since the new firmware)<br><br>- 7216 DVR "audio dropouts" - 1-2 brief audio dropouts that many here have reported - this NO LONGER happens  :p :p (This was my biggest gripe - was very annoying, and happened after channel change, FF, REW, etc.)<br><br>- Picture freeze / Audio continues - many people reported this, mostly on Fox HD (thread on here about "24") and other 720p HD stations - this NO LONGER happens  :p :p (2nd biggest gripe - my other half almost forced us back to Comcast b/c of this)<br><br>- Response to remote control is MUCH faster and the IMG itself seems snappier (i.e if you hit 30-sec skip twice, it actually skips 60 seconds!!)<br><br>- Some menus and layouts have been made more fluid and it's easier to find things<br><br>- Search functionality seems to be much faster<br><br>- I only ever saw the "Unable to locate HUB" message once or twice (with 1.6), but have not seen it since 1.6.2.<br><br>- We should be closer to getting logos back for all of the newer channels that have been added over the past 6+ months<br><br>- Additional "games" offerings <br><br>- When you power off the STB, a new floating VZ symbol screen saver kicks in<br><br>I hope this is a good starting point for everyone. I've always had 7xxx series boxes, so I CANNOT comment on the "SD pic quality".<br><br>Overall, everyone should be extremely happy once they receive the update, and this board should become much quieter.  :p<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21981005</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:14:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980867</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1039177"><b>mwnets78</b></A> : Matt,<br><br>This question is not off topic. Can you list the fixes that are in 1.6.2. If not, can you at least tell me if the update will fix the "Unable to locate hub" error that occurs while using multi-room DVR? This is the most annoying problem, and it makes the feature absolutely useless. Not to mention that I'm paying extra for this feature, and unable to use it.<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980867</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:49:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980843</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1497946"><b>joe01880</b></A> : VHO 6a is Rhode Island usually serviced the same time as VHO 6.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980843</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:44:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980756</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1251487"><b>bwintx</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  mikeruoc <A HREF="/useremail/u/1204911"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Any work on North Texas? I forget which VHO we are. </div>A list of VHOs, copied from a thread of several months ago...<br><blockquote><br>vho 1 Carrollton, TX<br>vho 2 Temple Terrace, FL<br>vho 3 Pomona, CA<br>vho 4 Silver Spring, MD<br>vho 5 Queens, NY<br>vho 6 Burlington, MA<br>vho 7 Freehold, NJ<br>vho 8 Philadelphia, PA<br>vho 9 Richmond, VA<br>vho 9a Norfolk, VA<br>vho 10 Fort Wayne, IN<br>vho 11 Pittsburgh, PA<br>vho 12 Portland, OR<br>vho 13 Seattle, WA<br>vho 14 Harrisburg, PA<br>vho 15 Buffalo, NY<br></blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980756</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:22:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980743</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : If you know your VHO, send me a PM and i'll try and help out.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980743</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:21:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980731</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1506561"><b>crankerchick</b></A> : I am also interested in knowing about the Howard County/Anne Arundel county area of MD (vho4). i venture to say posting an estimated schedule won't stop people from asking "what is the date for my vho?" but it will at least help me.<br><br>ETA VHO info.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980731</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:18:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980709</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1609346"><b>Xanthos</b></A> : Does anyone have the most recent roll out schedule for the 1.6.2 push for all video hubs?  I am particularly interested as to when we will see it in the Washington DC metro area - VH04..I think..<br><br>Thanks]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980709</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:14:05 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980578</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1582034"><b>stevec325</b></A> : I'd bet that there are many (vast majority of) people, who didn't notice any difference. I did, though. But, I didn't care... 99.9999% of what I watch is HD. Not saying most folks are like me, but I am saying that most folks don't know enough to complain.<br><br>Honestly, if it were not for folks here, complaining to V, they would have probably not done anything sooner.<br><br>Let's hope the SD PQ is finally no longer an issue after 1.6.2<br><small>--<br>"...and all the science, I don't understand. It's just my job, five days a week"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980578</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:50:23 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980573</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1204911"><b>mikeruoc</b></A> : Any work on North Texas? I forget which VHO we are. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980573</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:49:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980572</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/548382"><b>JeepMatt</b></A> : Folks,<br>Let's please try and keep this thread on topic.<br><small>--<br>"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!"</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980572</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:49:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980567</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><b>jwdv22</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  jwdv22 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>Either way, IMO it is great that VZ heard the complaints and issues and fixed it.<br> </div>That's not great, thats EXPECTED.  If were actually giving credit for things that are so basic and assumed, then were going down a long dark road.<br> </div>Expected? Only thing I ever expected from Comcast is to pay through the nose for nothing. F'ing rip off. HATED Comcast, so anything a company does that will acknowledge a "problem" or a misjudgement on their part is great IMO. Please find me that in this industry. <br>While that may be a sad commentary on the TV industry, it is still better than most.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980567</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:47:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980558</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/263330"><b>jammmin</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jaw2012 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Your argument that PQ is not all that important is just laughable. Especially when PQ is a huge reason people get Fios, SD or HD.<br><br> </div>And especially since FIOS advertises itself as having the best PQ. BTW, I haven't seen one of those ads lately. I wonder why :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980558</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:46:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980515</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1570506"><b>jaw2012</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  jwdv22 <A HREF="/useremail/u/1520367"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>Either way, IMO it is great that VZ heard the complaints and issues and fixed it.<br> </div>That's not great, thats EXPECTED.  If were actually giving credit for things that are so basic and assumed, then were going down a long dark road.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980515</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:40:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: 1.6.2 Upgrade Thread</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980510</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/762336"><b>RECD Designz</b></A> : Any info on Fl?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,21980510</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:39:14 E