Ding ding ding ding. CORRECT. From the Bloomberg article:
"...In rejecting the lower court’s reasoning, Roberts invoked a 2004 Supreme Court decision that shielded AT&T, Verizon Communications Inc. and Qwest Communications International Inc. from some lawsuits by would-be telephone-service competitors. That ruling said phone companies can’t be sued under the antitrust laws for not complying with a 1996 federal law requiring they give competitors access to local networks. "
The funny thing is, when other providers years ago were charging 50+ bucks for DSL, and ATT "squeezed" them by introducing 19.99/29.99 dsl pricepoints, ATT is suddenly thijnking "hmm maybe lowering the price wasn't such a good idea. " Let's introduce caps! yeah!
·
