republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The CRTC Getting An Earful » give in. end it
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
69
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« The CRTC Getting An Earful  
AuthorAll Replies


dunno

@videotron.ca

give in. end it

This may sound dumb, but I say gieve everyone what they want in regards to the new Media hearings. A 2.5% levy. Lock the levy in for 20-years. The levy then gets spilt between new canadian media and the CRIA/hollywood lobbies. End of story. End of the piracy bullshit.

On the neutrality front, remove the throttle that singles out one protocol, and do more or less what comcast is doing (or said they would do), but only on people who exceed the B/W that comes with their paid for package (after all these ISP's seel a service and advertize a service based on speed and B/W). They should be held accountable to that.


Thrudd

join:2004-06-21
Mississauga, ON

Are you suggesting they use the ]*gasp* model that usenet providers have been using all this time?

Max bandwidth/throughput with a throttle down once a predetermined limit has been reached.

My god man that would make way too much sense and forthought on their part. It will never happen until a government comes in asking nicely while swinging a sledgehammer at all the rats popping up.

richard_lau

join:2009-02-10
Austin, TX

reply to dunno
said by dunno :

On the neutrality front, remove the throttle that singles out one protocol, and do more or less what comcast is doing (or said they would do), but only on people who exceed the B/W that comes with their paid for package (after all these ISP's seel a service and advertize a service based on speed and B/W). They should be held accountable to that.
Great point! Here in the U.S. you have DSL / Cable providers that are selling consumers one service, but delivering another... throttling speeds, subjectively limiting access to parts of the Internet, etc.

Companies such as Comcast don't want their customers connecting to 3rd party content/services, they want them connecting to stuff that's offered by Comcast or Comcast's partners.

By throttling connections, or establishing unreasonable download caps (Time Warner's new plan for 5GB-40GB caps) they're effectively discouraging the use of 3rd party sites.

For what it's worth I thought the following articles we're interesting...

»www.newsadmin.com/usenet_comment···2009.asp
»www.newsadmin.com/usenet_comment···2009.asp
-
Forums » The CRTC Getting An Earful« The CRTC Getting An Earful  


Sunday, 29-Nov 15:02:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [124] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [80] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [77] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [77] Weekend Open Thread
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [63] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Is Easynews down? [Filesharing Software]
· Are GPS's better today? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Grey Cup on the Web? [Canadian Chat]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Surfers beware !!! [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 12 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Idiotic neighbour [Canadian Chat]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]